[jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8346587: Distrust TLS server certificates anchored by Camerfirma Root CAs

[Antonio Vieiro]

On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 18:52:18 GMT, Antonio Vieiro <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Almost clean backport of [JDK-8346587](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8346587) to distrust TLS server certificates issued after April 15, 2025 and anchored by Camerfirma Root CAs.
> 
> This is on top of [this previous PR](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk11u-dev/pull/2993) for [JDK-8339560](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8339560) ("Unaddressed comments during code review of JDK-8337664").
> 
> The backport is not completely clean because it required a change in line 98 of `CamerfirmaTLSPolicy.java` since [JDK-8270946](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8270946) has not been backported to 11.
> 
> Passes `tier1` and `jdk/sun/security` tests:
> 
> 
> ==============================
> Test summary
> ==============================
>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
>    jtreg:test/hotspot/jtreg:tier1                     1497  1497     0     0   
>    jtreg:test/jdk:tier1                               1899  1899     0     0   
>    jtreg:test/langtools:tier1                         3941  3941     0     0   
>    jtreg:test/nashorn:tier1                              0     0     0     0   
>    jtreg:test/jaxp:tier1                                 0     0     0     0   
> ==============================
> TEST SUCCESS
> 
> 
> ==============================
> Test summary
> ==============================
>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
>    jtreg:test/jdk/sun/security                         657   657     0     0   
> ==============================
> TEST SUCCESS

- Test failures unrelated (see https://github.com/openjdk/jdk11u-dev/pull/2987).
- [JDK-8270946](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8270946) could be backported too from [JDK-17](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17u/commit/facbabb2032aabed0cb52cfcdc6894db1358edbf) but I think the risk is too high for just a single-line fix.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2994#issuecomment-2658923174