From mdoerr at openjdk.org  Mon Jun  2 09:32:10 2025
From: mdoerr at openjdk.org (Martin Doerr)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 09:32:10 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8357793: [PPC64] VM crashes with -XX:-UseSIGTRAP
 -XX:-ImplicitNullChecks
Message-ID: <4fPDyysZhozZl4V9_X2bOTHxSLimmp1Htr3WjMHoW9U=.86600e78-4429-4c2a-b4c2-9dd8e07abc47@github.com>

Almost clean backport of [JDK-8357793](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357793). I only had to change `SharedRuntime` to `StubRoutines` because [JDK-8337987](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8337987) is not in 21.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport ba9f44c90fe8da2d97d67b6878ac2c0c14e35bd0

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1842/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=1842&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357793
  Stats: 4 lines in 2 files changed: 2 ins; 0 del; 2 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1842.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1842/head:pull/1842

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1842

From mbaesken at openjdk.org  Mon Jun  2 11:22:58 2025
From: mbaesken at openjdk.org (Matthias Baesken)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 11:22:58 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8352946: SEGV_BND signal code of SIGSEGV
 missing from our signal-code table
In-Reply-To: <Pjz-d9l6oLunW_LV0MTOOOQz3t5cJ2xRoP2xWgxIBXc=.d28e5bdd-1d57-4dc1-8660-9c2d3f99c965@github.com>
References: <Pjz-d9l6oLunW_LV0MTOOOQz3t5cJ2xRoP2xWgxIBXc=.d28e5bdd-1d57-4dc1-8660-9c2d3f99c965@github.com>
Message-ID: <fjfICb6urT1BtyiSm6ssB0N_bTutX4s4xdNOcNKSVMk=.9cb10acc-5149-44d6-b72d-5017a3933a36@github.com>

On Fri, 23 May 2025 12:39:13 GMT, Matthias Baesken <mbaesken at openjdk.org> wrote:

> 8352946: SEGV_BND signal code of SIGSEGV missing from our signal-code table

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 27b6284b
Author:    Matthias Baesken <mbaesken at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/27b6284bdd3ec7d627ccde9ddd22ea47e7463834
Stats:     6 lines in 1 file changed: 6 ins; 0 del; 0 mod

8352946: SEGV_BND signal code of SIGSEGV missing from our signal-code table

Backport-of: bac2aa44454982684e06854add1dbbb806fba363

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1829

From varadam at openjdk.org  Mon Jun  2 11:41:22 2025
From: varadam at openjdk.org (Varada M)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 11:41:22 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8301793: AlgorithmId should not encode a missing
 parameters field as NULL unless hardcoded
Message-ID: <hsrPO0j4v0g_Oboi-0PxUDNVaowh8CDc1urggdHMiWQ=.a0e9ff76-9988-4084-bbef-35940177d4d6@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [a97271e3](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/a97271e3b5d5a08fc503a11cd3e253974fb77ce6) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Weijun Wang on 6 Mar 2023 and was reviewed by Sean Mullan.

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport a97271e3b5d5a08fc503a11cd3e253974fb77ce6

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3615/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=3615&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8301793
  Stats: 189 lines in 2 files changed: 123 ins; 17 del; 49 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3615.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3615/head:pull/3615

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3615

From mbaesken at openjdk.org  Mon Jun  2 12:36:34 2025
From: mbaesken at openjdk.org (Matthias Baesken)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 12:36:34 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8353568: SEGV_BNDERR signal code adjust definition
Message-ID: <85ywgN6ei6KlUGcin6Q8PCYJAHpeZqoeadyyHH6H1Y0=.2a2f26e7-bccc-4c34-ac3b-06b1e995d81c@github.com>

8353568: SEGV_BNDERR signal code adjust definition

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 6abf4e6d4d9f948b8ae51aec731b94ba7acd022e

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1843/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=1843&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8353568
  Stats: 6 lines in 1 file changed: 4 ins; 0 del; 2 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1843.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1843/head:pull/1843

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1843

From mbaesken at openjdk.org  Mon Jun  2 12:43:28 2025
From: mbaesken at openjdk.org (Matthias Baesken)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 12:43:28 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8351277: Remove pipewire from AIX build
Message-ID: <WELbISzTS7-uMsX2967tNkDDPh58OYVczWiZA7wUzx4=.2c785a04-647c-4202-a7e1-2178f6742b6d@github.com>

makefile needs adjustments, screencast_pipewire.c diffs in the stride + COPYRIGHT info

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 6bc480358c80b0a1a94b5ca5f4b7ff2d84ce8e37

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1844/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=1844&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8351277
  Stats: 42 lines in 4 files changed: 35 ins; 4 del; 3 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1844.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1844/head:pull/1844

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1844

From gnu.andrew at redhat.com  Mon Jun  2 13:43:55 2025
From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 14:43:55 +0100
Subject: [RAMPDOWN] 11.0.28 Now in Rampdown Stage
Message-ID: <aD2qm/WAMhG5Eym0@rincewind>

11.0.28 is now in rampdown for release in July 2025.

jdk11u-dev is CLOSED for commits until
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8358325 is integrated to begin the
11.0.29 release cycle.

For critical fixes (i.e. regressions or urgent fixes like tzdata &
cacerts updates) for 11.0.28, please file a PR against
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk11u and use jdk11u-critical-request to
obtain approval to push (automatic with the /approval request command
[0]).

[0] https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/SKARA/Pull+Request+Commands#PullRequestCommands-/approval

Thanks,
-- 
Andrew :)
Pronouns: he / him or they / them
Principal Free Java Software Engineer
OpenJDK Package Owner
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

Please contact via e-mail, not proprietary chat networks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/attachments/20250602/2bc6e012/signature.asc>

From mdoerr at openjdk.org  Mon Jun  2 14:36:56 2025
From: mdoerr at openjdk.org (Martin Doerr)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 14:36:56 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8351277: Remove pipewire from AIX build
In-Reply-To: <WELbISzTS7-uMsX2967tNkDDPh58OYVczWiZA7wUzx4=.2c785a04-647c-4202-a7e1-2178f6742b6d@github.com>
References: <WELbISzTS7-uMsX2967tNkDDPh58OYVczWiZA7wUzx4=.2c785a04-647c-4202-a7e1-2178f6742b6d@github.com>
Message-ID: <LG-Yp2P6TF4bltbNWXIdU42wbFhn2YPeB6V6_Qo54sc=.c43c469b-ca76-47d6-ba83-683fce2c6d1c@github.com>

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 12:38:55 GMT, Matthias Baesken <mbaesken at openjdk.org> wrote:

> makefile needs adjustments, screencast_pipewire.c diffs in the stride + COPYRIGHT info

LGTM. Thanks for backporting!

-------------

Marked as reviewed by mdoerr (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1844#pullrequestreview-2888708856

From sgehwolf at openjdk.org  Mon Jun  2 15:20:15 2025
From: sgehwolf at openjdk.org (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 15:20:15 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8292177: InitialSecurityProperty JFR event
In-Reply-To: <ALcH4ezo76g2d0yVgvu9z_FxcvapWVyGJGBjP4VMMA0=.cd697ccd-4bd6-4a35-a2ad-68f243b969f9@github.com>
References: <i03kWEhXTk7JXYB3koVNDbUcD3mb_a0NTCHyBmN3g20=.d306254b-bc4b-4270-af00-960952bbbd07@github.com>
 <ALcH4ezo76g2d0yVgvu9z_FxcvapWVyGJGBjP4VMMA0=.cd697ccd-4bd6-4a35-a2ad-68f243b969f9@github.com>
Message-ID: <epyMEEtsNtdktH2ugLkkPTQO1pum4I2mWqgAX4vWN4Y=.325102a1-4ac6-4fb0-988b-434994b26b30@github.com>

On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:32:19 GMT, Andrew John Hughes <andrew at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This backport introduces the JFR security event, `InitialSecurityProperty`, and along with it, the caching of the initial security properties which is also used by [JDK-8281658](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8281658) to show the security properties with `-XshowSettings`.
>> 
>> The change was backported to the Oracle fork of 11u in 11.0.20.
>> 
>> The following changes were necessary for the backport:
>> 
>> * `JavaSecurityPropertiesAccess` is moved to `jdk.internal.misc` where `SharedSecrets` lives in 11u
>> * `ensureClassInitialized` in `SharedSecrets` is called from the `unsafe` instance in 11u, as with other `get*Access()` methods in that class
>> * The patch to `module-info.java` is not needed as `jdk.jfr` already has access to `jdk.internal.misc` in 11u. The 17u addition is to `jdk.internal.access`.
>> * There are context differences in `JDKEvents.java` due to events introduced in later JDK versions.
>> * The `EventNames.java` test includes a huge unrelated change to reorganise the order of the variable modifiers. This was applied manually to the names in 11u, which differ slightly from those in 17u.
>> 
>> All `jdk.jfr.event` tests passed, including the new one, with the exception of `TestNative`, but that seems to be a setup issue rather than a regression caused by this patch (`Error. Use -nativepath to specify the location of native code`)
>
> Keep open please.

@gnu-andrew Please re-open. @franferrax @martinuy Could you please help review this? Thanks!

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2827#issuecomment-2931223046

From ssubramaniam at openjdk.org  Mon Jun  2 22:20:00 2025
From: ssubramaniam at openjdk.org (Satyen Subramaniam)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 22:20:00 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8342782: AWTEventMulticaster throws
 StackOverflowError using AquaButtonUI
In-Reply-To: <s456Gjm5yb1oOL5B-NSbZkH2YDUgrUyrN7DzpMr4sqk=.5d4ae562-b4c2-40e9-9e30-c5ec743238b0@github.com>
References: <s456Gjm5yb1oOL5B-NSbZkH2YDUgrUyrN7DzpMr4sqk=.5d4ae562-b4c2-40e9-9e30-c5ec743238b0@github.com>
Message-ID: <GtDd6AmiBDgtzfu-LcXNDp_bwYtaGAzFU7em9e9DVvM=.014bf61a-926a-48fc-8eda-792cce160d03@github.com>

On Mon, 19 May 2025 21:31:04 GMT, Satyen Subramaniam <ssubramaniam at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8342782: AWTEventMulticaster throws StackOverflowError using AquaButtonUI. Refactoring `AWTEventMulticaster` to avoid stack overflow error when using AquaButtonUI. Ran GHA Sanity Checks, local Tier 1 and 2, and new test. Patch is clean.

Closing, low priority

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1810#issuecomment-2932705957

From ssubramaniam at openjdk.org  Mon Jun  2 22:20:03 2025
From: ssubramaniam at openjdk.org (Satyen Subramaniam)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 22:20:03 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8342782: AWTEventMulticaster throws
 StackOverflowError using AquaButtonUI
In-Reply-To: <Jsb7phg38pisIRPD6HN19lIWVjjxRCFCnWrkLSzDG48=.a55e6b21-9a3c-416b-9755-038e80006512@github.com>
References: <Jsb7phg38pisIRPD6HN19lIWVjjxRCFCnWrkLSzDG48=.a55e6b21-9a3c-416b-9755-038e80006512@github.com>
Message-ID: <_MqwMFnf5GtNlgmzCbXxRyTS1hNmSNqK7_vrWxOxyn4=.617ec785-1aec-47fe-8b53-2a55ea11ef90@github.com>

On Mon, 19 May 2025 21:31:18 GMT, Satyen Subramaniam <ssubramaniam at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8342782: AWTEventMulticaster throws StackOverflowError using AquaButtonUI. Refactoring `AWTEventMulticaster` to avoid stack overflow error when using AquaButtonUI. Ran GHA Sanity Checks, local Tier 1 and 2, and new test. Patch is clean.

Closing, low priority

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3592#issuecomment-2932706206

From ssubramaniam at openjdk.org  Mon Jun  2 22:20:01 2025
From: ssubramaniam at openjdk.org (Satyen Subramaniam)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 22:20:01 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Withdrawn: 8342782: AWTEventMulticaster throws
 StackOverflowError using AquaButtonUI
In-Reply-To: <s456Gjm5yb1oOL5B-NSbZkH2YDUgrUyrN7DzpMr4sqk=.5d4ae562-b4c2-40e9-9e30-c5ec743238b0@github.com>
References: <s456Gjm5yb1oOL5B-NSbZkH2YDUgrUyrN7DzpMr4sqk=.5d4ae562-b4c2-40e9-9e30-c5ec743238b0@github.com>
Message-ID: <lrRNnz74FZ5YthdUAUyQQKoFApXiDPejrW0bIcF28FY=.2768b094-21d4-42a8-b762-3a3578536181@github.com>

On Mon, 19 May 2025 21:31:04 GMT, Satyen Subramaniam <ssubramaniam at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8342782: AWTEventMulticaster throws StackOverflowError using AquaButtonUI. Refactoring `AWTEventMulticaster` to avoid stack overflow error when using AquaButtonUI. Ran GHA Sanity Checks, local Tier 1 and 2, and new test. Patch is clean.

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1810

From ssubramaniam at openjdk.org  Mon Jun  2 22:20:03 2025
From: ssubramaniam at openjdk.org (Satyen Subramaniam)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 22:20:03 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Withdrawn: 8342782: AWTEventMulticaster throws
 StackOverflowError using AquaButtonUI
In-Reply-To: <Jsb7phg38pisIRPD6HN19lIWVjjxRCFCnWrkLSzDG48=.a55e6b21-9a3c-416b-9755-038e80006512@github.com>
References: <Jsb7phg38pisIRPD6HN19lIWVjjxRCFCnWrkLSzDG48=.a55e6b21-9a3c-416b-9755-038e80006512@github.com>
Message-ID: <q9_JiTjbFXIFGxtclwJo8JONYQWRigjzu51J1tdgLvQ=.b15d1877-ed32-44a9-be6f-228ab352e3e0@github.com>

On Mon, 19 May 2025 21:31:18 GMT, Satyen Subramaniam <ssubramaniam at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8342782: AWTEventMulticaster throws StackOverflowError using AquaButtonUI. Refactoring `AWTEventMulticaster` to avoid stack overflow error when using AquaButtonUI. Ran GHA Sanity Checks, local Tier 1 and 2, and new test. Patch is clean.

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3592

From ssubramaniam at openjdk.org  Mon Jun  2 22:23:52 2025
From: ssubramaniam at openjdk.org (Satyen Subramaniam)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 22:23:52 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8338281: jshell does not run shutdown hooks
In-Reply-To: <U1wzG4koXFw7CcrwzsB2GS_BxSa2Wz4MXu_u0Ii1eD0=.56663479-81ac-44dd-9ba5-fbec91c59cae@github.com>
References: <U1wzG4koXFw7CcrwzsB2GS_BxSa2Wz4MXu_u0Ii1eD0=.56663479-81ac-44dd-9ba5-fbec91c59cae@github.com>
Message-ID: <QE-a3yp46QjjbxOyeD_sZJraOxps8I2BWX11YiUryLQ=.7597b6f1-88b4-461a-93b6-f81b990720dd@github.com>

On Mon, 19 May 2025 22:17:52 GMT, Satyen Subramaniam <ssubramaniam at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8338281: jshell does not run shutdown hooks. Adjusts logic to now exit the remote agent when receiving the CLOSE event and delays the JShell's close for a moment for the remote process to finish. Ran GHA Sanity Checks, local Tier 1 and 2, and adjusted test. Patch is clean.

Closing, low priority

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1813#issuecomment-2932714138

From ssubramaniam at openjdk.org  Mon Jun  2 22:23:52 2025
From: ssubramaniam at openjdk.org (Satyen Subramaniam)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 22:23:52 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Withdrawn: 8338281: jshell does not run shutdown hooks
In-Reply-To: <U1wzG4koXFw7CcrwzsB2GS_BxSa2Wz4MXu_u0Ii1eD0=.56663479-81ac-44dd-9ba5-fbec91c59cae@github.com>
References: <U1wzG4koXFw7CcrwzsB2GS_BxSa2Wz4MXu_u0Ii1eD0=.56663479-81ac-44dd-9ba5-fbec91c59cae@github.com>
Message-ID: <RfL3Ejzq_f8-jfRpgqE2e2bgFyyIVkRPJKivNvShUkc=.a53e6216-cf4f-48b6-acdf-907ff5a9bfed@github.com>

On Mon, 19 May 2025 22:17:52 GMT, Satyen Subramaniam <ssubramaniam at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8338281: jshell does not run shutdown hooks. Adjusts logic to now exit the remote agent when receiving the CLOSE event and delays the JShell's close for a moment for the remote process to finish. Ran GHA Sanity Checks, local Tier 1 and 2, and adjusted test. Patch is clean.

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1813

From ssubramaniam at openjdk.org  Mon Jun  2 22:24:59 2025
From: ssubramaniam at openjdk.org (Satyen Subramaniam)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 22:24:59 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8338281: jshell does not run shutdown hooks [v2]
In-Reply-To: <xiEq3AP21vO8lWdvY-9fyU9xFYkcWG5Kx2XryGQDXO4=.d764fc2b-34c1-4d50-90a0-b39bd571dcc6@github.com>
References: <mmBAaJhs_vxUS5EyHY2FP9ub19UDiP6tMhRKAm8wHQM=.4eeacb67-a94a-4d2c-973e-a9ec43319aab@github.com>
 <xiEq3AP21vO8lWdvY-9fyU9xFYkcWG5Kx2XryGQDXO4=.d764fc2b-34c1-4d50-90a0-b39bd571dcc6@github.com>
Message-ID: <zYG8r_LoWXtcZWsFTHfYqjvvLKRjKg_CJ-MJNw3oZUQ=.5b9d8b7c-8273-4968-b857-bed40d77b19d@github.com>

On Thu, 22 May 2025 19:30:14 GMT, Satyen Subramaniam <ssubramaniam at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Backporting JDK-8338281: jshell does not run shutdown hooks. Adjusts logic to now exit the remote agent when receiving the CLOSE event and delays the JShell's close for a moment for the remote process to finish. Ran GHA Sanity Checks, local Tier 1 and 2, and adjusted test. Patch is clean.
>
> Satyen Subramaniam has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Removing java.util.stream.Stream;

Closing, low priority

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3595#issuecomment-2932714551

From ssubramaniam at openjdk.org  Mon Jun  2 22:25:00 2025
From: ssubramaniam at openjdk.org (Satyen Subramaniam)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 22:25:00 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Withdrawn: 8338281: jshell does not run shutdown hooks
In-Reply-To: <mmBAaJhs_vxUS5EyHY2FP9ub19UDiP6tMhRKAm8wHQM=.4eeacb67-a94a-4d2c-973e-a9ec43319aab@github.com>
References: <mmBAaJhs_vxUS5EyHY2FP9ub19UDiP6tMhRKAm8wHQM=.4eeacb67-a94a-4d2c-973e-a9ec43319aab@github.com>
Message-ID: <HfgFG8TtHrxYAvmyp27K_tw0_TjHkU7kBe4JHE9N-9c=.33562761-a500-4fa2-96a5-c222ea314073@github.com>

On Mon, 19 May 2025 22:18:01 GMT, Satyen Subramaniam <ssubramaniam at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8338281: jshell does not run shutdown hooks. Adjusts logic to now exit the remote agent when receiving the CLOSE event and delays the JShell's close for a moment for the remote process to finish. Ran GHA Sanity Checks, local Tier 1 and 2, and adjusted test. Patch is clean.

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3595

From bylokhov at amazon.com  Tue Jun  3 07:59:03 2025
From: bylokhov at amazon.com (Sergey Bylokhov)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 00:59:03 -0700
Subject: Result: New JDK Updates Committer: Satyen Subramaniam
In-Reply-To: <5f1d0d48-5a6a-49b1-b9a4-8171a301007c@amazon.com>
References: <5f1d0d48-5a6a-49b1-b9a4-8171a301007c@amazon.com>
Message-ID: <954e3d40-68de-4660-9e04-4b4d7323bb16@amazon.com>

Voting for Satyen Subramaniam [1] is now closed.

Yes: 2
Veto: 0
Abstain: 0

According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is
sufficient to approve the nomination.

Sergey Bylokhov

[1] https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2025-May/043703.html

-- 
Best regards, Sergey.




From duke at openjdk.org  Tue Jun  3 12:53:18 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Radek Cap)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 12:53:18 GMT
Subject: [jdk24u] RFR: 8348328: Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to Version
 2025-05-15
Message-ID: <dAFR78fH7PeOUVDEhpqJLH_xhOzpL2zvGT5ZHAPZGt4=.a844eb2a-02f4-437c-a5ed-2c3f556b7bd7@github.com>

Backport of JDK-8348328  - Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to Version 2025-05-15

The IANA Functions Operator has updated the language subtag registry to "2025-05-15".

Clean backport. 
Passed tier1 tests. 

The only failing jtreg tier1 test (TestFindInstMemRecursion.java) is failing on the master as well with 


test result: Failed. Execution failed: `main' threw exception: java.awt.AWTError: Can't connect to X11 window server using ':0' as the value of the DISPLAY variable.


GH Actions are passing

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport f318868268f32934a2f0c4e26a6c75360d8e74b1

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk24u/pull/227/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk24u&pr=227&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8348328
  Stats: 143 lines in 2 files changed: 135 ins; 1 del; 7 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk24u/pull/227.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk24u.git pull/227/head:pull/227

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk24u/pull/227

From mdoerr at openjdk.org  Tue Jun  3 13:19:12 2025
From: mdoerr at openjdk.org (Martin Doerr)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 13:19:12 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8358310: ZGC: riscv,
 ppc ZPlatformAddressOffsetBits may return a too large value
Message-ID: <ke-_amVYMHK94UaGC_XJyMtXiQRc7Ieq0LUrPLxFTdQ=.3c5b2232-8184-42b5-8ff9-4d1ca2528c0d@github.com>

Backport of [JDK-8358310](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8358310). Applies cleanly, but JDK21 still contains the non-generational version of ZGC which should also get updated. I'm using the same values as in the generational version.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 4618374269e8636c772d921ad0c2c2d9e5e3e643

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1845/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=1845&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8358310
  Stats: 21 lines in 4 files changed: 6 ins; 0 del; 15 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1845.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1845/head:pull/1845

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1845

From mdoerr at openjdk.org  Tue Jun  3 13:19:12 2025
From: mdoerr at openjdk.org (Martin Doerr)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 13:19:12 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8358310: ZGC: riscv,
 ppc ZPlatformAddressOffsetBits may return a too large value
In-Reply-To: <ke-_amVYMHK94UaGC_XJyMtXiQRc7Ieq0LUrPLxFTdQ=.3c5b2232-8184-42b5-8ff9-4d1ca2528c0d@github.com>
References: <ke-_amVYMHK94UaGC_XJyMtXiQRc7Ieq0LUrPLxFTdQ=.3c5b2232-8184-42b5-8ff9-4d1ca2528c0d@github.com>
Message-ID: <zOcGe50hPjYC7z858UbF1LCa1cKbfXbf2kexuVWxp-A=.4ce55084-baec-49a9-acbc-608ac1763fb1@github.com>

On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 13:13:05 GMT, Martin Doerr <mdoerr at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backport of [JDK-8358310](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8358310). Applies cleanly, but JDK21 still contains the non-generational version of ZGC which should also get updated. I'm using the same values as in the generational version.

@RealFYang, @xmas92: JDK21 is also affected.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1845#issuecomment-2935180188

From fferrari at openjdk.org  Tue Jun  3 14:23:10 2025
From: fferrari at openjdk.org (Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 14:23:10 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8292177: InitialSecurityProperty JFR event
In-Reply-To: <epyMEEtsNtdktH2ugLkkPTQO1pum4I2mWqgAX4vWN4Y=.325102a1-4ac6-4fb0-988b-434994b26b30@github.com>
References: <i03kWEhXTk7JXYB3koVNDbUcD3mb_a0NTCHyBmN3g20=.d306254b-bc4b-4270-af00-960952bbbd07@github.com>
 <ALcH4ezo76g2d0yVgvu9z_FxcvapWVyGJGBjP4VMMA0=.cd697ccd-4bd6-4a35-a2ad-68f243b969f9@github.com>
 <epyMEEtsNtdktH2ugLkkPTQO1pum4I2mWqgAX4vWN4Y=.325102a1-4ac6-4fb0-988b-434994b26b30@github.com>
Message-ID: <24vZAfN-598HH1DVzqL0bbAyMltd9Dz1qhXM6MO02cY=.b77cb21c-de69-4d91-b388-610438e735e3@github.com>

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 15:17:34 GMT, Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Keep open please.
>
> @gnu-andrew Please re-open. @franferrax @martinuy Could you please help review this? Thanks!

Hi @jerboaa, sorry for missing the March review request. I'm willing to review, but please note it won't be enough as I'm not a Reviewer.

@gnu-andrew: besides re-opening it, could you sync it with the current `master`, in order to have an up-to-date GitHub Actions run?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2827#issuecomment-2935521817

From sgehwolf at openjdk.org  Tue Jun  3 14:26:07 2025
From: sgehwolf at openjdk.org (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 14:26:07 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8292177: InitialSecurityProperty JFR event
In-Reply-To: <epyMEEtsNtdktH2ugLkkPTQO1pum4I2mWqgAX4vWN4Y=.325102a1-4ac6-4fb0-988b-434994b26b30@github.com>
References: <i03kWEhXTk7JXYB3koVNDbUcD3mb_a0NTCHyBmN3g20=.d306254b-bc4b-4270-af00-960952bbbd07@github.com>
 <ALcH4ezo76g2d0yVgvu9z_FxcvapWVyGJGBjP4VMMA0=.cd697ccd-4bd6-4a35-a2ad-68f243b969f9@github.com>
 <epyMEEtsNtdktH2ugLkkPTQO1pum4I2mWqgAX4vWN4Y=.325102a1-4ac6-4fb0-988b-434994b26b30@github.com>
Message-ID: <JR6QCXFd2HHmtHSi_MWZJb4izDjBgan7SzqoWj0jF04=.b09ba221-b05c-444d-b97a-a3b3a71c29d4@github.com>

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 15:17:34 GMT, Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Keep open please.
>
> @gnu-andrew Please re-open. @franferrax @martinuy Could you please help review this? Thanks!

> Hi @jerboaa, sorry for missing the March review request. I'm willing to review, but please note it won't be enough as I'm not a Reviewer.

For a second review it should be fine. Thanks!

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2827#issuecomment-2935541009

From andrew at openjdk.org  Tue Jun  3 14:36:13 2025
From: andrew at openjdk.org (Andrew John Hughes)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 14:36:13 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8358325: Bump update version of OpenJDK: 11.0.29
Message-ID: <algIdGzNVfMWD4NbmzN7QM8tp7e0I9c8piPEqtDg0U4=.623600f4-f4c6-4af2-9fcf-f13ae535cbd2@github.com>

Rampdown for 11.0.28 [has begun](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2025-June/044318.html). 11u-dev needs to transition to 11.0.29.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - 8358325: Bump update version of OpenJDK: 11.0.29

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3040/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u-dev&pr=3040&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8358325
  Stats: 3 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 3 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3040.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/3040/head:pull/3040

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3040

From gnu.andrew at redhat.com  Tue Jun  3 14:48:17 2025
From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 15:48:17 +0100
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK Updates Committer: Antonio Vieiro
Message-ID: <aD8LMdj0B5JbkLgH@rincewind>

I hereby nominate Antonio Vieiro (avieiro) [0] to the role of OpenJDK
Updates Committer.

Antonio has already made a number of contributions of backporting work
for 11u [1]. Having the committer role would aid this backporting work
by avoiding the need to wait for sponsorship of fixes, after review &
approval.

Votes are due by 15h00 UTC on Tuesday, the 17th of June, 2025.

Only current OpenJDK Updates Committers (and above) [2] are eligible
to vote on this nomination.

Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.

For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3].

[0] https://openjdk.org/census#avieiro
[1] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk11u-dev/pulls?q=is%3Apr+author%3Avieiro+is%3Aclosed+label%3Aintegrated
[2] https://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk-updates
[3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote

Thanks,
-- 
Andrew :)
Pronouns: he / him or they / them
Principal Free Java Software Engineer
OpenJDK Package Owner
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

Please contact via e-mail, not proprietary chat networks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/attachments/20250603/ca3584ea/signature.asc>

From duke at openjdk.org  Tue Jun  3 14:52:53 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 14:52:53 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8343618: Stack smashing in awt_InputMethod.c on
 Linux s390x
In-Reply-To: <9LechP6yoByG3u9_XI1_zNoaXg7--xrIW9cOKNZpHMA=.927dede1-aad2-4cc2-a425-f4f9b396b1e3@github.com>
References: <9LechP6yoByG3u9_XI1_zNoaXg7--xrIW9cOKNZpHMA=.927dede1-aad2-4cc2-a425-f4f9b396b1e3@github.com>
Message-ID: <jpWe2fCtJUcQddNNY2zOQoE0Ivu-xFIHx6sZBvlzAqc=.b62f9b5c-b0c9-4828-88dd-33072efef84c@github.com>

On Wed, 28 May 2025 12:41:05 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky <zzambers at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backport fixing stack smashing issue in `awt_InputMethod.c` on s390x. Clean.

@zzambers 
Your change (at version 77b0a8f001a1bccca46b66896e1f1e476ba12662) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1836#issuecomment-2935719118

From andrew at openjdk.org  Tue Jun  3 15:02:57 2025
From: andrew at openjdk.org (Andrew John Hughes)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 15:02:57 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8343618: Stack smashing in awt_InputMethod.c on
 Linux s390x
In-Reply-To: <9LechP6yoByG3u9_XI1_zNoaXg7--xrIW9cOKNZpHMA=.927dede1-aad2-4cc2-a425-f4f9b396b1e3@github.com>
References: <9LechP6yoByG3u9_XI1_zNoaXg7--xrIW9cOKNZpHMA=.927dede1-aad2-4cc2-a425-f4f9b396b1e3@github.com>
Message-ID: <PXifEvd6BWvxPWpbhUQ1h485r9JItUvz8D0vNiKPMvg=.1fffa8d0-318f-435f-9b6b-214189987622@github.com>

On Wed, 28 May 2025 12:41:05 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky <zzambers at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backport fixing stack smashing issue in `awt_InputMethod.c` on s390x. Clean.

Just checking this one over now, but good to see this finally getting fixed.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1836#issuecomment-2935788215

From andrew at openjdk.org  Tue Jun  3 15:05:58 2025
From: andrew at openjdk.org (Andrew John Hughes)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 15:05:58 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8343618: Stack smashing in awt_InputMethod.c on
 Linux s390x
In-Reply-To: <9LechP6yoByG3u9_XI1_zNoaXg7--xrIW9cOKNZpHMA=.927dede1-aad2-4cc2-a425-f4f9b396b1e3@github.com>
References: <9LechP6yoByG3u9_XI1_zNoaXg7--xrIW9cOKNZpHMA=.927dede1-aad2-4cc2-a425-f4f9b396b1e3@github.com>
Message-ID: <bX9NEHqztY5IAIU06Gko_ezI7PrYQ5NMuUPV3k6jcbo=.07adc797-fbe1-4dcf-ba57-3eb6f1a12c71@github.com>

On Wed, 28 May 2025 12:41:05 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky <zzambers at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backport fixing stack smashing issue in `awt_InputMethod.c` on s390x. Clean.

Confirmed clean.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by andrew (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1836#pullrequestreview-2892917463

From zzambers at openjdk.org  Tue Jun  3 15:13:55 2025
From: zzambers at openjdk.org (Zdenek Zambersky)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 15:13:55 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8343618: Stack smashing in awt_InputMethod.c
 on Linux s390x
In-Reply-To: <9LechP6yoByG3u9_XI1_zNoaXg7--xrIW9cOKNZpHMA=.927dede1-aad2-4cc2-a425-f4f9b396b1e3@github.com>
References: <9LechP6yoByG3u9_XI1_zNoaXg7--xrIW9cOKNZpHMA=.927dede1-aad2-4cc2-a425-f4f9b396b1e3@github.com>
Message-ID: <Dti5C2cOnyvVAmCslgr0fAV6K_b22EV1XCauDPx78Uo=.908c012c-1e6f-465f-a879-20ebb3be1fb1@github.com>

On Wed, 28 May 2025 12:41:05 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky <zzambers at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backport fixing stack smashing issue in `awt_InputMethod.c` on s390x. Clean.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: c7409c79
Author:    Zdenek Zambersky <zzambers at openjdk.org>
Committer: Andrew John Hughes <andrew at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/c7409c79614a0693694e979065205bd847a5bee9
Stats:     20 lines in 1 file changed: 10 ins; 10 del; 0 mod

8343618: Stack smashing in awt_InputMethod.c on Linux s390x

Reviewed-by: andrew
Backport-of: ee6891456ed672305d9b48846b5a7977373e1284

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1836

From adinn at redhat.com  Tue Jun  3 15:20:09 2025
From: adinn at redhat.com (Andrew Dinn)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 16:20:09 +0100
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK Updates Committer: Antonio Vieiro
In-Reply-To: <aD8LMdj0B5JbkLgH@rincewind>
References: <aD8LMdj0B5JbkLgH@rincewind>
Message-ID: <35ce23cd-7f40-486b-9c6d-480b953285bd@redhat.com>

Vote: yes

On 03/06/2025 15:48, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Antonio Vieiro (avieiro) [0] to the role of OpenJDK
> Updates Committer.
> 
> Antonio has already made a number of contributions of backporting work
> for 11u [1]. Having the committer role would aid this backporting work
> by avoiding the need to wait for sponsorship of fixes, after review &
> approval.
> 
> Votes are due by 15h00 UTC on Tuesday, the 17th of June, 2025.
> 
> Only current OpenJDK Updates Committers (and above) [2] are eligible
> to vote on this nomination.
> 
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3].
> 
> [0] https://openjdk.org/census#avieiro
> [1] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk11u-dev/pulls?q=is%3Apr+author%3Avieiro+is%3Aclosed+label%3Aintegrated
> [2] https://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk-updates
> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> 
> Thanks,

-- 
regards,


Andrew Dinn
-----------
Red Hat Distinguished Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903


From gnu.andrew at redhat.com  Tue Jun  3 15:22:50 2025
From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 16:22:50 +0100
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK Updates Committer: Antonio Vieiro
In-Reply-To: <aD8LMdj0B5JbkLgH@rincewind>
References: <aD8LMdj0B5JbkLgH@rincewind>
Message-ID: <aD8TSn3GBFrUmlYY@rincewind>

On 15:48 Tue 03 Jun     , Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Antonio Vieiro (avieiro) [0] to the role of OpenJDK
> Updates Committer.
> 
> Antonio has already made a number of contributions of backporting work
> for 11u [1]. Having the committer role would aid this backporting work
> by avoiding the need to wait for sponsorship of fixes, after review &
> approval.
> 
> Votes are due by 15h00 UTC on Tuesday, the 17th of June, 2025.
> 
> Only current OpenJDK Updates Committers (and above) [2] are eligible
> to vote on this nomination.
> 
> Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3].
> 
> [0] https://openjdk.org/census#avieiro
> [1] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk11u-dev/pulls?q=is%3Apr+author%3Avieiro+is%3Aclosed+label%3Aintegrated
> [2] https://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk-updates
> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote
> 

Vote: Yes
-- 
Andrew :)
Pronouns: he / him or they / them
Principal Free Java Software Engineer
OpenJDK Package Owner
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

Please contact via e-mail, not proprietary chat networks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/attachments/20250603/ba469a1f/signature.asc>

From sgehwolf at openjdk.org  Tue Jun  3 15:25:53 2025
From: sgehwolf at openjdk.org (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 15:25:53 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8358325: Bump update version of OpenJDK: 11.0.29
In-Reply-To: <algIdGzNVfMWD4NbmzN7QM8tp7e0I9c8piPEqtDg0U4=.623600f4-f4c6-4af2-9fcf-f13ae535cbd2@github.com>
References: <algIdGzNVfMWD4NbmzN7QM8tp7e0I9c8piPEqtDg0U4=.623600f4-f4c6-4af2-9fcf-f13ae535cbd2@github.com>
Message-ID: <U0K6DTBu5K_l7IL-z25I58-81PyQRXGSshdwlBMVT9c=.8fe15e22-4554-45ae-b5ee-660267f6dff5@github.com>

On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 14:31:38 GMT, Andrew John Hughes <andrew at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Rampdown for 11.0.28 [has begun](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2025-June/044318.html). 11u-dev needs to transition to 11.0.29.

Marked as reviewed by sgehwolf (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3040#pullrequestreview-2893039513

From martin.doerr at sap.com  Tue Jun  3 15:41:15 2025
From: martin.doerr at sap.com (Doerr, Martin)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 15:41:15 +0000
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK Updates Committer: Antonio Vieiro
In-Reply-To: <aD8LMdj0B5JbkLgH@rincewind>
References: <aD8LMdj0B5JbkLgH@rincewind>
Message-ID: <AS8PR02MB85448A1DADCFBD4C7733445B9A6DA@AS8PR02MB8544.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>

Vote: yes

Best regards,
Martin

Am 03.06.25, 16:49 schrieb "jdk-updates-dev" <jdk-updates-dev-retn at openjdk.org>:
I hereby nominate Antonio Vieiro (avieiro) [0] to the role of OpenJDK
Updates Committer.

Antonio has already made a number of contributions of backporting work
for 11u [1]. Having the committer role would aid this backporting work
by avoiding the need to wait for sponsorship of fixes, after review &
approval.

Votes are due by 15h00 UTC on Tuesday, the 17th of June, 2025.

Only current OpenJDK Updates Committers (and above) [2] are eligible
to vote on this nomination.

Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list.

For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [3].

[0] https://openjdk.org/census#avieiro
[1] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk11u-dev/pulls?q=is%3Apr+author%3Avieiro+is%3Aclosed+label%3Aintegrated
[2] https://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk-updates
[3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote

Thanks,
--
Andrew :)
Pronouns: he / him or they / them
Principal Free Java Software Engineer
OpenJDK Package Owner
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

Please contact via e-mail, not proprietary chat networks

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/attachments/20250603/587f9e6c/attachment.htm>

From sgehwolf at redhat.com  Tue Jun  3 15:47:49 2025
From: sgehwolf at redhat.com (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2025 17:47:49 +0200
Subject: CFV: New OpenJDK Updates Committer: Antonio Vieiro
In-Reply-To: <aD8LMdj0B5JbkLgH@rincewind>
References: <aD8LMdj0B5JbkLgH@rincewind>
Message-ID: <05465e0c60a854356a9ae09e3e27d13e6997dbe8.camel@redhat.com>

Vote: yes

On Tue, 2025-06-03 at 15:48 +0100, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> I hereby nominate Antonio Vieiro (avieiro) [0] to the role of OpenJDK
> Updates Committer.


From serb at openjdk.org  Wed Jun  4 02:40:33 2025
From: serb at openjdk.org (Sergey Bylokhov)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 02:40:33 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8358325: Bump update version of OpenJDK: 11.0.29
In-Reply-To: <algIdGzNVfMWD4NbmzN7QM8tp7e0I9c8piPEqtDg0U4=.623600f4-f4c6-4af2-9fcf-f13ae535cbd2@github.com>
References: <algIdGzNVfMWD4NbmzN7QM8tp7e0I9c8piPEqtDg0U4=.623600f4-f4c6-4af2-9fcf-f13ae535cbd2@github.com>
Message-ID: <5QnwiiJxkeaFF74K0Y4NVQGyTU-pzGlJzTllVB8Ketw=.0fa58432-6676-4b05-96a7-7fd8f9e54b61@github.com>

On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 14:31:38 GMT, Andrew John Hughes <andrew at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Rampdown for 11.0.28 [has begun](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2025-June/044318.html). 11u-dev needs to transition to 11.0.29.

Marked as reviewed by serb (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3040#pullrequestreview-2894742717

From serb at openjdk.org  Wed Jun  4 02:41:31 2025
From: serb at openjdk.org (Sergey Bylokhov)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 02:41:31 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8224267: JOptionPane message string with 5000+
 newlines produces StackOverflowError
In-Reply-To: <OBoMEqY8TVhlEto85WKSMPBQpqzR-XwD2rvLf5rN3S8=.753a641d-3f2f-47ec-b84b-f96b91e580d6@github.com>
References: <OBoMEqY8TVhlEto85WKSMPBQpqzR-XwD2rvLf5rN3S8=.753a641d-3f2f-47ec-b84b-f96b91e580d6@github.com>
Message-ID: <3zCDmnyw-2qO8bokPB-Xz8JT9gl9kRpy-qDCG86WDdw=.8a005a88-8dce-47d6-ab0b-963889cc5982@github.com>

On Wed, 28 May 2025 10:03:16 GMT, Sergey Chernyshev <schernyshev at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This is a parity backport with 11.0.28-oracle.
> 
> Thanks!

do you plan to backport https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8290162 as well?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3036#issuecomment-2938147679

From schernyshev at openjdk.org  Wed Jun  4 07:36:30 2025
From: schernyshev at openjdk.org (Sergey Chernyshev)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 07:36:30 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8224267: JOptionPane message string with 5000+
 newlines produces StackOverflowError
In-Reply-To: <3zCDmnyw-2qO8bokPB-Xz8JT9gl9kRpy-qDCG86WDdw=.8a005a88-8dce-47d6-ab0b-963889cc5982@github.com>
References: <OBoMEqY8TVhlEto85WKSMPBQpqzR-XwD2rvLf5rN3S8=.753a641d-3f2f-47ec-b84b-f96b91e580d6@github.com>
 <3zCDmnyw-2qO8bokPB-Xz8JT9gl9kRpy-qDCG86WDdw=.8a005a88-8dce-47d6-ab0b-963889cc5982@github.com>
Message-ID: <hqLXMYr8Tm-vods21KO_scfCLEzkkQOh3hWfWmiVNV4=.815a1595-0fbc-40fa-a841-1eb60fac623e@github.com>

On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 02:38:21 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov <serb at openjdk.org> wrote:

> do you plan to backport https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8290162 as well?

@mrserb yes, 8290162 and 5074006, that depend on this one.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3036#issuecomment-2938938557

From andrew at openjdk.org  Wed Jun  4 12:38:07 2025
From: andrew at openjdk.org (Andrew John Hughes)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 12:38:07 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] Integrated: 8358325: Bump update version of OpenJDK:
 11.0.29
In-Reply-To: <algIdGzNVfMWD4NbmzN7QM8tp7e0I9c8piPEqtDg0U4=.623600f4-f4c6-4af2-9fcf-f13ae535cbd2@github.com>
References: <algIdGzNVfMWD4NbmzN7QM8tp7e0I9c8piPEqtDg0U4=.623600f4-f4c6-4af2-9fcf-f13ae535cbd2@github.com>
Message-ID: <wKL4qTTsymc5Z7fWAK3mTcxYdHvUx4PaeTw-Ij_R6aw=.8e398972-fa7b-4c33-b778-9f708016ff11@github.com>

On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 14:31:38 GMT, Andrew John Hughes <andrew at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Rampdown for 11.0.28 [has begun](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/2025-June/044318.html). 11u-dev needs to transition to 11.0.29.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 17ebc3cf
Author:    Andrew John Hughes <andrew at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/commit/17ebc3cf145a647c2eac6e1ed253989075f88c05
Stats:     3 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 3 mod

8358325: Bump update version of OpenJDK: 11.0.29

Reviewed-by: sgehwolf, serb

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3040

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Jun  4 13:11:57 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Antonio Vieiro)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 13:11:57 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8356096: ISO 4217 Amendment 179 Update
In-Reply-To: <ygz8HGVtFp68MpEDBDlpqDksTMKMmgX6mnyzm3LMpZw=.cb0c0e73-8301-4398-86f1-99e55011df74@github.com>
References: <ygz8HGVtFp68MpEDBDlpqDksTMKMmgX6mnyzm3LMpZw=.cb0c0e73-8301-4398-86f1-99e55011df74@github.com>
Message-ID: <dqwdNwrQF-HDIoV8CHpRmRVtH8-amQY1sT4xi95h2S8=.aa3726ec-1bcb-4771-a657-818a09719e8c@github.com>

On Thu, 29 May 2025 08:17:25 GMT, Antonio Vieiro <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Clean backport of [JDK-8356096](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8356096) that implements update 179 of ISO-4217 with changes effective from may 2025.  This is CPU205_07-critical-approved.
> 
> Tested on Linux with tier1 tests and:
> 
> 
> ==============================
> Test summary
> ==============================
>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
>    jtreg:test/jdk/java/util/Currency/ValidateISO4217.java
>                                                          1     1     0     0   
> ==============================
> TEST SUCCESS

Superseeded by https://github.com/openjdk/jdk11u/pull/102 in jdk11, can be reopened if the one in jdk11 does not get merged.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3038#issuecomment-2939983040

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Jun  4 13:11:57 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Antonio Vieiro)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 13:11:57 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] Withdrawn: 8356096: ISO 4217 Amendment 179 Update
In-Reply-To: <ygz8HGVtFp68MpEDBDlpqDksTMKMmgX6mnyzm3LMpZw=.cb0c0e73-8301-4398-86f1-99e55011df74@github.com>
References: <ygz8HGVtFp68MpEDBDlpqDksTMKMmgX6mnyzm3LMpZw=.cb0c0e73-8301-4398-86f1-99e55011df74@github.com>
Message-ID: <zQBVkc0r0n4Y0i5_SeBDzMfTCIIPskuHxI_-q8ba2RI=.3bf3b5dc-2b1d-4d3a-a909-cab95554488c@github.com>

On Thu, 29 May 2025 08:17:25 GMT, Antonio Vieiro <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Clean backport of [JDK-8356096](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8356096) that implements update 179 of ISO-4217 with changes effective from may 2025.  This is CPU205_07-critical-approved.
> 
> Tested on Linux with tier1 tests and:
> 
> 
> ==============================
> Test summary
> ==============================
>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
>    jtreg:test/jdk/java/util/Currency/ValidateISO4217.java
>                                                          1     1     0     0   
> ==============================
> TEST SUCCESS

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3038

From rmarchenko at openjdk.org  Wed Jun  4 13:13:28 2025
From: rmarchenko at openjdk.org (Roman Marchenko)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 13:13:28 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8347826: Introspector shows wrong method list after
 8071693
Message-ID: <gbpGN3UjKfnkKqqg4QhyESPUe-z8WWXoNb1Efs3AmaU=.cc9281fb-1e36-4e02-8088-bba6a888fbc4@github.com>

This is  backport of "8347826: Introspector shows wrong method list after 8071693"

The backport is almost clean, the only conflict was in copyright year in `src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/beans/Introspector.java`.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport c5f235c000db6654493ea109008dbccf97f01678

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1847/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=1847&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8347826
  Stats: 455 lines in 4 files changed: 398 ins; 8 del; 49 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1847.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1847/head:pull/1847

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1847

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Jun  4 13:20:23 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Radek Cap)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 13:20:23 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8348328: Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to
 Version 2025-05-15
Message-ID: <CepAURwW-ldvrNT3y1WtK1lJRjhCBh0cJKHHHVEAZBI=.cb0917ee-bc7f-4925-8761-80c10b583eaf@github.com>

Backport of JDK-8348328 - Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to Version 2025-05-15

The IANA Functions Operator has updated the language subtag registry to "2025-05-15".

Clean backport.
Passed tier1 tests. 

There are the same failures on the master branch in a local run:


compiler/escapeAnalysis/TestFindInstMemRecursion.java: 
test result: Failed. Execution failed: `main' threw exception: java.awt.AWTError: Can't connect to X11 window server using ':0' as the value of the DISPLAY variable.

serviceability/sa/ClhsdbPstack.java#core
test result: Error. Program `/home/rcap/git/github/jdk21u-dev/build/linux-x86_64-server-release/images/jdk/bin/java' timed out (timeout set to 1920000ms, elapsed time including timeout handling was 1920178ms).

serviceability/sa/ClhsdbPstack.java#process
test result: Error. Program `/home/rcap/git/github/jdk21u-dev/build/linux-x86_64-server-release/images/jdk/bin/java' timed out (timeout set to 480000ms, elapsed time including timeout handling was 480217ms).

serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixed.java:
test result: Error. "driver" action timed out with a timeout of 480 seconds on agent 58

java/foreign/nested/TestNested.java
test result: Failed. Compilation failed: Compilation failed


GH Actions are passing, Windows failures are unrelated.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport f318868268f32934a2f0c4e26a6c75360d8e74b1

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1846/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=1846&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8348328
  Stats: 143 lines in 2 files changed: 135 ins; 1 del; 7 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1846.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1846/head:pull/1846

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1846

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Jun  4 13:23:12 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Antonio Vieiro)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 13:23:12 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u] RFR: 8356096: ISO 4217 Amendment 179 Update
Message-ID: <i4AnQxc9mHCKXwxbNJgsbgwlXbrL8nkPRSbTdZ8LiTA=.57a92944-db39-4b7b-bf37-73039b0f02bf@github.com>

Clean backport of [JDK-8356096](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8356096) that implements update #179 of ISO-4217 with changes effective from may 2025. This is CPU2025_07-critical-approved, so I moved the PR from jdk11u-dev: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk11u-dev/pull/3038 .

Tested on Linux with tier1 tests and:


==============================
Test summary
==============================
   TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
   jtreg:test/jdk/java/util/Currency/ValidateISO4217.java
                                                         1     1     0     0   
==============================
TEST SUCCESS


NOTE: Windows GHA tests were skipped because of [JDK-8358538](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8358538)

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport b8484be137a9d8bf6463188e1fc68b22db0b52c3

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u/pull/102/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u&pr=102&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8356096
  Stats: 11 lines in 4 files changed: 3 ins; 0 del; 8 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u/pull/102.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u.git pull/102/head:pull/102

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u/pull/102

From duke at openjdk.org  Wed Jun  4 15:15:02 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 15:15:02 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u] RFR: 8356096: ISO 4217 Amendment 179 Update
In-Reply-To: <i4AnQxc9mHCKXwxbNJgsbgwlXbrL8nkPRSbTdZ8LiTA=.57a92944-db39-4b7b-bf37-73039b0f02bf@github.com>
References: <i4AnQxc9mHCKXwxbNJgsbgwlXbrL8nkPRSbTdZ8LiTA=.57a92944-db39-4b7b-bf37-73039b0f02bf@github.com>
Message-ID: <u-iHUPjdH75X0eeY1zgeVYL9c1IdmRZlErBblkDSF8o=.69068a09-2323-465b-a7a5-2247507eafa8@github.com>

On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 13:08:27 GMT, Antonio Vieiro <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Clean backport of [JDK-8356096](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8356096) that implements update #179 of ISO-4217 with changes effective from may 2025. This is CPU2025_07-critical-approved, so I moved the PR from jdk11u-dev: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk11u-dev/pull/3038 .
> 
> Tested on Linux with tier1 tests and:
> 
> 
> ==============================
> Test summary
> ==============================
>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
>    jtreg:test/jdk/java/util/Currency/ValidateISO4217.java
>                                                          1     1     0     0   
> ==============================
> TEST SUCCESS
> 
> 
> NOTE: Windows GHA tests were skipped because of [JDK-8358538](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8358538)

@vieiro 
Your change (at version 378b3944d31e772fd6eb2c6d1729f294e84c0b3a) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u/pull/102#issuecomment-2940415876

From abakhtin at openjdk.org  Wed Jun  4 16:31:51 2025
From: abakhtin at openjdk.org (Alexey Bakhtin)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 16:31:51 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8347826: Introspector shows wrong method list
 after 8071693
In-Reply-To: <gbpGN3UjKfnkKqqg4QhyESPUe-z8WWXoNb1Efs3AmaU=.cc9281fb-1e36-4e02-8088-bba6a888fbc4@github.com>
References: <gbpGN3UjKfnkKqqg4QhyESPUe-z8WWXoNb1Efs3AmaU=.cc9281fb-1e36-4e02-8088-bba6a888fbc4@github.com>
Message-ID: <EuFK3IFwC22ArnQfzjxoghxd_Rigwqk-Y1uqAV6fneE=.e1879ec7-c775-4f0d-af43-48b408a2c894@github.com>

On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 10:18:17 GMT, Roman Marchenko <rmarchenko at openjdk.org> wrote:

> This is  backport of "8347826: Introspector shows wrong method list after 8071693"
> 
> The backport is almost clean, the only conflict was in copyright year in `src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/beans/Introspector.java`.

Looks good. No regressions in java/beans/Inspector tests after applying the patch. Updated DefaultMethodBeanTest passes.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by abakhtin (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1847#pullrequestreview-2897395066

From ssubramaniam at openjdk.org  Wed Jun  4 17:18:20 2025
From: ssubramaniam at openjdk.org (Satyen Subramaniam)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 17:18:20 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8343452: Incorrect WINDOWS build variable is used in
 macroAssembler_x86.cpp
Message-ID: <itK3wkrX7XdUt8g_zIt81KzNI-j8F4zrlOlg1YOCirU=.e23f3d1b-bb69-41ea-8c6b-a97f4fee2f3a@github.com>

Backporting JDK-8343452: Incorrect WINDOWS build variable is used in macroAssembler_x86.cpp. HotSpot VM build macro only defines _WINDOWS env variable (not WINDOWS). `call_clobbered_gp_registers()` and `call_clobbered_xmm_registers()` use the wrong variable name. Leads to RSI and RDI missing from list of clobbered register on windows due, and may cause issue when calling native code which modifies them. Ran GHA Sanity Checks and local Tier 1 and 2 (though not on a Windows machine). Patch is clean.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 0e1c1b793d43064aabe9571057284899c9580f30

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1848/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=1848&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8343452
  Stats: 2 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 2 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1848.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1848/head:pull/1848

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1848

From ssubramaniam at openjdk.org  Wed Jun  4 17:24:15 2025
From: ssubramaniam at openjdk.org (Satyen Subramaniam)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 17:24:15 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8313355:
 javax/management/remote/mandatory/notif/ListenerScaleTest.java failed with
 "Exception: Failed: ratio=792.2791601423487"
Message-ID: <IxVpOxZCIkUiePDhODR8MYvgVvaxzZkS4XU9NQraV24=.9e0a6c37-ae15-49b9-bde4-eb1c80d7cbf7@github.com>

Backporting JDK-8313355: javax/management/remote/mandatory/notif/ListenerScaleTest.java failed with "Exception: Failed: ratio=792.2791601423487". The `javax/management/remote/mandatory/notif/ListenerScaleTest.java` test fails intermittently - this change preserves the function of the test, while minimizing/removing intermittent failures. Specifically, the test exists to check that notification work does not scale linearly with number of MBeans, so it calculates a ratio of the time taken with one, and with 20,000 MBeans. We can increase the point at which that calculated ratio is considered a failure: original commit chooses 2500. Ran GHA Sanity Checks, local Tier 1 and 2, and adjusted test. Patch is clean.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport debf0ecfb0076f5513595c74038215520d630764

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1849/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=1849&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313355
  Stats: 4 lines in 1 file changed: 2 ins; 0 del; 2 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1849.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1849/head:pull/1849

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1849

From ssubramaniam at openjdk.org  Wed Jun  4 17:37:14 2025
From: ssubramaniam at openjdk.org (Satyen Subramaniam)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 17:37:14 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8334010: VM crashes with ObjectAlignmentInBytes >
 GCCardSizeInBytes
Message-ID: <UBSzAbqcsG2pYhxHq847qlY-dZf6j1qravPHiOhRn2U=.abcc85d3-d641-4278-9d3e-5aa7709830cd@github.com>

Backporting JDK-8334010: VM crashes with ObjectAlignmentInBytes > GCCardSizeInBytes. This change makes VM initialization reject invalid combinations of ObjectAlignmentInBytes and GCCardSizeInBytes. ObjectAlignmentInBytes larger than GCCardSizeInBytes causes issues with setting correct BOT offsets. Ran GHA Sanity Checks, local Tier 1 and 2, and new test directly. Patch is clean.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 577babf1968700e4b648305cd5a5c2ddf712e2dc

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1850/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=1850&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8334010
  Stats: 71 lines in 2 files changed: 71 ins; 0 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1850.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1850/head:pull/1850

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1850

From serb at openjdk.org  Wed Jun  4 19:42:45 2025
From: serb at openjdk.org (Sergey Bylokhov)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 19:42:45 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8356053: Test
 java/awt/Toolkit/Headless/HeadlessToolkit.java fails by timeout
Message-ID: <5UR9_tAgWtW7Lj5M4Oj-27V5aXxfGO79oyRRrbzwOM8=.08535eb1-0921-46ee-9bd8-2779d01b212f@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [375f3dc9](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/375f3dc9ed0f1704e726d0d704420c38a0a5513c) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Sergey Bylokhov on 9 May 2025 and was reviewed by Phil Race and Alexander Zuev.

The patch doesn't apply cleanly because the deleted lines use a different URL in jdk11u. That's because [JDK-8295470](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8295470) wasn't backported there.

Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 375f3dc9ed0f1704e726d0d704420c38a0a5513c

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3041/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u-dev&pr=3041&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8356053
  Stats: 26 lines in 1 file changed: 15 ins; 4 del; 7 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3041.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/3041/head:pull/3041

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3041

From phh at openjdk.org  Wed Jun  4 19:57:59 2025
From: phh at openjdk.org (Paul Hohensee)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 19:57:59 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8217527: jmod hash does not work if
 --hash-module does not include the target module [v2]
In-Reply-To: <iq7rPgWdI7IPZ0bmJKR0xUwKppza7jDKvG2FTVFt6Ts=.353765d9-fd71-4fe5-a6fc-03a7e914a7a6@github.com>
References: <xu2XXAMBtYzlrm3VyGeWYeluuhPz_kYxv3nrm3K7Ybk=.a1c6902b-cb2f-412e-81eb-83eae6e616af@github.com>
 <iq7rPgWdI7IPZ0bmJKR0xUwKppza7jDKvG2FTVFt6Ts=.353765d9-fd71-4fe5-a6fc-03a7e914a7a6@github.com>
Message-ID: <b_a-N489pQpA2O-eocoryGKMpyPiZzqweNRrtyXQiHU=.b5c0af21-93a2-4bc6-a887-9b074f326c43@github.com>

On Sat, 31 May 2025 16:41:21 GMT, Daniel Hu <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I'd like to backport this fix because currently `jmod hash` command does not work on already created modules and this fixes that issue. This isn't intended behavior; nothing in Oracle documentation states this limitation, and moreover the command itself gives opaque response: there's no error message or non-zero exit, instead the command does nothing and no modules are changed after hashing.
>> 
>> The backport isn't clean because of conflicts in `HashesTest.java`. The conflicts are due to later commits being backported first; as all main `HashesTest.java` patches on jdk17 are now backport to 11, resolution meant simply copying 17's implementation over (some differences remain like `upgradeableModule` method is in different location but otherwise its function is exactly the same). This change was ran on internal Amazon pipelines and passes jtreg tier1-4 + tck tests on the following platforms: linux x64, aarch64, x86, aarch32; macos x64, aarch64; windows x64, x86.
>
> Daniel Hu has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Add missing testHashModulesPattern

testHashModulesPattern() was static as in the original patch, but tip has it virtual, so np afaic.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by phh (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3039#pullrequestreview-2897938264

From phh at openjdk.org  Wed Jun  4 19:59:52 2025
From: phh at openjdk.org (Paul Hohensee)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 19:59:52 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8357793: [PPC64] VM crashes with -XX:-UseSIGTRAP
 -XX:-ImplicitNullChecks
In-Reply-To: <4fPDyysZhozZl4V9_X2bOTHxSLimmp1Htr3WjMHoW9U=.86600e78-4429-4c2a-b4c2-9dd8e07abc47@github.com>
References: <4fPDyysZhozZl4V9_X2bOTHxSLimmp1Htr3WjMHoW9U=.86600e78-4429-4c2a-b4c2-9dd8e07abc47@github.com>
Message-ID: <mbyBvtTJd0pCf7gfLCE4q1BIFtEHTAHexStpwc6zo_0=.91077323-8482-48de-8230-fef5cdeb818c@github.com>

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 09:26:41 GMT, Martin Doerr <mdoerr at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Almost clean backport of [JDK-8357793](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357793). I only had to change `SharedRuntime` to `StubRoutines` because [JDK-8337987](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8337987) is not in 21.

Marked as reviewed by phh (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1842#pullrequestreview-2897943523

From mdoerr at openjdk.org  Wed Jun  4 20:06:57 2025
From: mdoerr at openjdk.org (Martin Doerr)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 20:06:57 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8357793: [PPC64] VM crashes with -XX:-UseSIGTRAP
 -XX:-ImplicitNullChecks
In-Reply-To: <4fPDyysZhozZl4V9_X2bOTHxSLimmp1Htr3WjMHoW9U=.86600e78-4429-4c2a-b4c2-9dd8e07abc47@github.com>
References: <4fPDyysZhozZl4V9_X2bOTHxSLimmp1Htr3WjMHoW9U=.86600e78-4429-4c2a-b4c2-9dd8e07abc47@github.com>
Message-ID: <Obw8Hbf47j5fPl7rB4aWdNLSd-DGtOR4voNIAZh9n9g=.746302fd-3988-4ad5-a414-f122582ec6e1@github.com>

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 09:26:41 GMT, Martin Doerr <mdoerr at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Almost clean backport of [JDK-8357793](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357793). I only had to change `SharedRuntime` to `StubRoutines` because [JDK-8337987](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8337987) is not in 21.

Thanks for the review!

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1842#issuecomment-2941309943

From serb at openjdk.org  Wed Jun  4 20:13:34 2025
From: serb at openjdk.org (Sergey Bylokhov)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 20:13:34 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8211804: Constant AO_UNUSED_MBZ uses left shift of
 negative value
Message-ID: <dKhT1PLCgmf7gW_wW8Kqhg5Li7SYc9Uz1ve5QDTG3Tc=.93eca072-7e53-49cb-9326-def3c5fcfab7@github.com>

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit [51be7db9](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/51be7db96f3fc32a7ddb24f8af19fb4fc0577aaf) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Kim Barrett on 9 Oct 2018 and was reviewed by Alan Bateman.

This patch fixes a build error on macOS with Xcode 16.4 that can't be resolved using `--disable-warnings-as-errors`.

/jdk11u-dev/src/jdk.pack/share/native/common-unpack/constants.h:206:33: error: expression is not an integral constant expression
  206 |     AO_UNUSED_MBZ             = (-1)<<13, // options bits reserved for future use.
      |                                 ^~~~~~~~




Thanks!

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 51be7db96f3fc32a7ddb24f8af19fb4fc0577aaf

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3042/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u-dev&pr=3042&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8211804
  Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3042.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/3042/head:pull/3042

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3042

From fyang at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 02:44:49 2025
From: fyang at openjdk.org (Fei Yang)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 02:44:49 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8358310: ZGC: riscv,
 ppc ZPlatformAddressOffsetBits may return a too large value
In-Reply-To: <ke-_amVYMHK94UaGC_XJyMtXiQRc7Ieq0LUrPLxFTdQ=.3c5b2232-8184-42b5-8ff9-4d1ca2528c0d@github.com>
References: <ke-_amVYMHK94UaGC_XJyMtXiQRc7Ieq0LUrPLxFTdQ=.3c5b2232-8184-42b5-8ff9-4d1ca2528c0d@github.com>
Message-ID: <ErEt8YbZ4yWeHXoMSSxBmyqeoThU2i1vClYqZHwNmDo=.e3891e90-ce4a-4b03-8063-e49ae29e6936@github.com>

On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 13:13:05 GMT, Martin Doerr <mdoerr at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backport of [JDK-8358310](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8358310). Applies cleanly, but JDK21 still contains the non-generational version of ZGC which should also get updated. I'm using the same values as in the generational version.

LGTM. `hotspot_gc` tested on linux-riscv64 platform. Thanks.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by fyang (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1845#pullrequestreview-2898707369

From goetz at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 06:53:41 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 06:53:41 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8358659: Bump update version for OpenJDK: jdk-21.0.9
Message-ID: <5Kd7VoaaAlI6FcBYFiH5wpBs7AdarPap9SKNlwvfytI=.d5b45c17-cfb3-49db-b5b1-ae5dda4f5767@github.com>

One of the required updates of meta information.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - 8358659: Bump update version for OpenJDK: jdk-21.0.9

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1852/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=1852&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8358659
  Stats: 3 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 3 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1852.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1852/head:pull/1852

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1852

From goetz at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 06:56:48 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 06:56:48 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8358660: Bump update version for OpenJDK:
 jdk-17.0.17
Message-ID: <PGRcbbZnqdQoiEtgz75zNxV1027I9y9T8hAudmHtUZ0=.1d543f55-530e-4e3a-9a13-44e9974a8829@github.com>

One of the required updates of meta information.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - 8358660: Bump update version for OpenJDK: jdk-17.0.17

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3616/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=3616&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8358660
  Stats: 3 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 3 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3616.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3616/head:pull/3616

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3616

From mbaesken at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 07:37:02 2025
From: mbaesken at openjdk.org (Matthias Baesken)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 07:37:02 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8358660: Bump update version for OpenJDK:
 jdk-17.0.17
In-Reply-To: <PGRcbbZnqdQoiEtgz75zNxV1027I9y9T8hAudmHtUZ0=.1d543f55-530e-4e3a-9a13-44e9974a8829@github.com>
References: <PGRcbbZnqdQoiEtgz75zNxV1027I9y9T8hAudmHtUZ0=.1d543f55-530e-4e3a-9a13-44e9974a8829@github.com>
Message-ID: <YypXYG0Ac9SnQtdPCOFlgq8rDgqwj5iLod140bgzNGQ=.93c702b0-3526-4faf-8478-b2dd737a5429@github.com>

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 06:51:30 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> One of the required updates of meta information.

Marked as reviewed by mbaesken (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3616#pullrequestreview-2899182549

From mbaesken at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 07:37:55 2025
From: mbaesken at openjdk.org (Matthias Baesken)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 07:37:55 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8358659: Bump update version for OpenJDK:
 jdk-21.0.9
In-Reply-To: <5Kd7VoaaAlI6FcBYFiH5wpBs7AdarPap9SKNlwvfytI=.d5b45c17-cfb3-49db-b5b1-ae5dda4f5767@github.com>
References: <5Kd7VoaaAlI6FcBYFiH5wpBs7AdarPap9SKNlwvfytI=.d5b45c17-cfb3-49db-b5b1-ae5dda4f5767@github.com>
Message-ID: <ZhqBclhefV7ANBFVnxDCUwTLWJxIQBTlzEq_DUy_-tU=.aea2ecc0-0ad0-438a-822e-264e03eee38a@github.com>

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 06:48:08 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> One of the required updates of meta information.

Marked as reviewed by mbaesken (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1852#pullrequestreview-2899185210

From sgehwolf at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 08:01:59 2025
From: sgehwolf at openjdk.org (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:01:59 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8358660: Bump update version for OpenJDK:
 jdk-17.0.17
In-Reply-To: <PGRcbbZnqdQoiEtgz75zNxV1027I9y9T8hAudmHtUZ0=.1d543f55-530e-4e3a-9a13-44e9974a8829@github.com>
References: <PGRcbbZnqdQoiEtgz75zNxV1027I9y9T8hAudmHtUZ0=.1d543f55-530e-4e3a-9a13-44e9974a8829@github.com>
Message-ID: <0AX0BXUc1a7EGjdRv3ryrMkGlD5ga3gNgkqepEj826s=.1f856211-ee3c-4660-b73d-32241b8b7d49@github.com>

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 06:51:30 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> One of the required updates of meta information.

Marked as reviewed by sgehwolf (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3616#pullrequestreview-2899259192

From sgehwolf at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 08:02:55 2025
From: sgehwolf at openjdk.org (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:02:55 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8358659: Bump update version for OpenJDK:
 jdk-21.0.9
In-Reply-To: <5Kd7VoaaAlI6FcBYFiH5wpBs7AdarPap9SKNlwvfytI=.d5b45c17-cfb3-49db-b5b1-ae5dda4f5767@github.com>
References: <5Kd7VoaaAlI6FcBYFiH5wpBs7AdarPap9SKNlwvfytI=.d5b45c17-cfb3-49db-b5b1-ae5dda4f5767@github.com>
Message-ID: <CYgsF9W-CVifxS1dqA3OmY5mBCykZximcFmVlScTiC8=.c2dc8c63-07de-456e-9c37-0e96692b62bd@github.com>

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 06:48:08 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> One of the required updates of meta information.

Marked as reviewed by sgehwolf (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1852#pullrequestreview-2899261568

From shade at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 08:05:10 2025
From: shade at openjdk.org (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:05:10 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8358538: Update GHA Windows runner to 2025
Message-ID: <vH_46Q0gZ4PoPkvYrcTllF1S1-5ptwK5GzmFvDqaMFA=.314f6040-38bd-4492-8fdd-ea3594fbe6c4@github.com>

Fixes GHA. Current Windows runners are already in brown-out stage, and will be decommissioned by the end of the month. So we need to get it into update repos soon.

Additional testing:
 - [ ] GHA

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport b787ff6def08a050b690b60e4a0ceb3aec2b73c8

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1853/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=1853&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8358538
  Stats: 6 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 6 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1853.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1853/head:pull/1853

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1853

From shade at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 08:08:38 2025
From: shade at openjdk.org (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:08:38 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8358538: Update GHA Windows runner to 2025
Message-ID: <Q2-tVhRJQcn7nRPQxH7K0Ffe-jpLX_86uY5k8Cgcq_M=.7f76ea90-cc7a-4bc4-a831-844185674bff@github.com>

Fixes GHA. Current Windows runners are already in brown-out stage, and will be decommissioned by the end of the month. So we need to get it into update repos soon.

Additional testing:
 - [ ] GHA

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport b787ff6def08a050b690b60e4a0ceb3aec2b73c8

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3617/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=3617&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8358538
  Stats: 6 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 6 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3617.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3617/head:pull/3617

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3617

From shade at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 08:08:52 2025
From: shade at openjdk.org (Aleksey Shipilev)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:08:52 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8358538: Update GHA Windows runner to 2025
In-Reply-To: <vH_46Q0gZ4PoPkvYrcTllF1S1-5ptwK5GzmFvDqaMFA=.314f6040-38bd-4492-8fdd-ea3594fbe6c4@github.com>
References: <vH_46Q0gZ4PoPkvYrcTllF1S1-5ptwK5GzmFvDqaMFA=.314f6040-38bd-4492-8fdd-ea3594fbe6c4@github.com>
Message-ID: <pFpGZ-xUuawMJCNdGXwPcLtklSUQlNjwYgRxwcjFoUE=.89f73fbc-d05f-4aee-be73-0290822a18ff@github.com>

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 07:56:51 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Fixes GHA. Current Windows runners are already in brown-out stage, and will be decommissioned by the end of the month. So we need to get it into update repos soon.
> 
> Additional testing:
>  - [ ] GHA

Of course there are build failures. Of course...

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1853#issuecomment-2943172058

From goetz at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 08:14:55 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:14:55 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8358659: Bump update version for OpenJDK:
 jdk-21.0.9
In-Reply-To: <5Kd7VoaaAlI6FcBYFiH5wpBs7AdarPap9SKNlwvfytI=.d5b45c17-cfb3-49db-b5b1-ae5dda4f5767@github.com>
References: <5Kd7VoaaAlI6FcBYFiH5wpBs7AdarPap9SKNlwvfytI=.d5b45c17-cfb3-49db-b5b1-ae5dda4f5767@github.com>
Message-ID: <YPAosXh6zBXqcaEfdhRt2G98WvClZoFKBwL3x8VtCeY=.115edb26-7ba7-47cb-bcbe-7290e84f452e@github.com>

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 06:48:08 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> One of the required updates of meta information.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: dcb39d84
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/dcb39d84a8949bc76a4754bd19abb7e26ce93aa6
Stats:     3 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 3 mod

8358659: Bump update version for OpenJDK: jdk-21.0.9

Reviewed-by: mbaesken, sgehwolf

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1852

From goetz at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 08:16:01 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:16:01 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Integrated: 8358660: Bump update version for OpenJDK:
 jdk-17.0.17
In-Reply-To: <PGRcbbZnqdQoiEtgz75zNxV1027I9y9T8hAudmHtUZ0=.1d543f55-530e-4e3a-9a13-44e9974a8829@github.com>
References: <PGRcbbZnqdQoiEtgz75zNxV1027I9y9T8hAudmHtUZ0=.1d543f55-530e-4e3a-9a13-44e9974a8829@github.com>
Message-ID: <EMpTokvj_-m-vt2QDVosL7jOKrIQAjZF8nTRMOO3LUA=.0a3f1378-7dea-45fc-b5c0-ada90f436456@github.com>

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 06:51:30 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> One of the required updates of meta information.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 3a46af4a
Author:    Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/commit/3a46af4ac3ba8d330a7fb6f0858113cca6e3d9a2
Stats:     3 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 3 mod

8358660: Bump update version for OpenJDK: jdk-17.0.17

Reviewed-by: mbaesken, sgehwolf

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3616

From goetz at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 08:23:51 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:23:51 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8348328: Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to
 Version 2025-05-15
In-Reply-To: <CepAURwW-ldvrNT3y1WtK1lJRjhCBh0cJKHHHVEAZBI=.cb0917ee-bc7f-4925-8761-80c10b583eaf@github.com>
References: <CepAURwW-ldvrNT3y1WtK1lJRjhCBh0cJKHHHVEAZBI=.cb0917ee-bc7f-4925-8761-80c10b583eaf@github.com>
Message-ID: <GNvRsaHnk8iwrFushJOP5UMypS33AwBU2iV_ML8iOaM=.1a7873ea-1ef0-4bf1-bbdc-64cab2ec6ba5@github.com>

On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 10:06:23 GMT, Radek Cap <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backport of JDK-8348328 - Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to Version 2025-05-15
> 
> The IANA Functions Operator has updated the language subtag registry to "2025-05-15".
> 
> Clean backport.
> Passed tier1 tests. 
> 
> There are the same failures on the master branch in a local run:
> 
> 
> compiler/escapeAnalysis/TestFindInstMemRecursion.java: 
> test result: Failed. Execution failed: `main' threw exception: java.awt.AWTError: Can't connect to X11 window server using ':0' as the value of the DISPLAY variable.
> 
> serviceability/sa/ClhsdbPstack.java#core
> test result: Error. Program `/home/rcap/git/github/jdk21u-dev/build/linux-x86_64-server-release/images/jdk/bin/java' timed out (timeout set to 1920000ms, elapsed time including timeout handling was 1920178ms).
> 
> serviceability/sa/ClhsdbPstack.java#process
> test result: Error. Program `/home/rcap/git/github/jdk21u-dev/build/linux-x86_64-server-release/images/jdk/bin/java' timed out (timeout set to 480000ms, elapsed time including timeout handling was 480217ms).
> 
> serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixed.java:
> test result: Error. "driver" action timed out with a timeout of 480 seconds on agent 58
> 
> java/foreign/nested/TestNested.java
> test result: Failed. Compilation failed: Compilation failed
> 
> 
> GH Actions are passing, Windows failures are unrelated.

HI @RadekCap 
if this gets approved for 24u, we want to get this into the July update.
Thus, in this case, we will need a PR agains jdk21u, not jdk21u-dev.
But we need to wait on the decision for 24u.
I remove the approval tag in the meantime.  Please label again if it get's denied for 24u (or does not make the July update).
If it makes the July update of 24u, please open a PR agains jdk21u and label jdk21u-critical-request.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1846#issuecomment-2943216964

From duke at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 08:35:50 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Radek Cap)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:35:50 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8348328: Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to
 Version 2025-05-15
In-Reply-To: <GNvRsaHnk8iwrFushJOP5UMypS33AwBU2iV_ML8iOaM=.1a7873ea-1ef0-4bf1-bbdc-64cab2ec6ba5@github.com>
References: <CepAURwW-ldvrNT3y1WtK1lJRjhCBh0cJKHHHVEAZBI=.cb0917ee-bc7f-4925-8761-80c10b583eaf@github.com>
 <GNvRsaHnk8iwrFushJOP5UMypS33AwBU2iV_ML8iOaM=.1a7873ea-1ef0-4bf1-bbdc-64cab2ec6ba5@github.com>
Message-ID: <22NCuZ7IBXGycfysbigIBZKwX-HTemxdWoC7kXYMNAc=.83cfa08f-0022-4d62-90a9-b1296e8e4fbf@github.com>

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:21:41 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Backport of JDK-8348328 - Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to Version 2025-05-15
>> 
>> The IANA Functions Operator has updated the language subtag registry to "2025-05-15".
>> 
>> Clean backport.
>> Passed tier1 tests. 
>> 
>> There are the same failures on the master branch in a local run:
>> 
>> 
>> compiler/escapeAnalysis/TestFindInstMemRecursion.java: 
>> test result: Failed. Execution failed: `main' threw exception: java.awt.AWTError: Can't connect to X11 window server using ':0' as the value of the DISPLAY variable.
>> 
>> serviceability/sa/ClhsdbPstack.java#core
>> test result: Error. Program `/home/rcap/git/github/jdk21u-dev/build/linux-x86_64-server-release/images/jdk/bin/java' timed out (timeout set to 1920000ms, elapsed time including timeout handling was 1920178ms).
>> 
>> serviceability/sa/ClhsdbPstack.java#process
>> test result: Error. Program `/home/rcap/git/github/jdk21u-dev/build/linux-x86_64-server-release/images/jdk/bin/java' timed out (timeout set to 480000ms, elapsed time including timeout handling was 480217ms).
>> 
>> serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixed.java:
>> test result: Error. "driver" action timed out with a timeout of 480 seconds on agent 58
>> 
>> java/foreign/nested/TestNested.java
>> test result: Failed. Compilation failed: Compilation failed
>> 
>> 
>> GH Actions are passing, Windows failures are unrelated.
>
> HI @RadekCap 
> if this gets approved for 24u, we want to get this into the July update.
> Thus, in this case, we will need a PR agains jdk21u, not jdk21u-dev.
> But we need to wait on the decision for 24u.
> I remove the approval tag in the meantime.  Please label again if it get's denied for 24u (or does not make the July update).
> If it makes the July update of 24u, please open a PR agains jdk21u and label jdk21u-critical-request.

Hi @GoeLin,

Yes, I'm waiting for 24u approval. Let's see which will come sooner: the July update or 24u approval.
If approved first, I'll create a PR against 24u and close this one. The same situation will likely apply to 17 (PR already exists and waiting for 24u, 21u approval), and later to 11.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1846#issuecomment-2943249031

From sgehwolf at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 08:55:04 2025
From: sgehwolf at openjdk.org (Severin Gehwolf)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:55:04 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u] RFR: 8356096: ISO 4217 Amendment 179 Update
In-Reply-To: <i4AnQxc9mHCKXwxbNJgsbgwlXbrL8nkPRSbTdZ8LiTA=.57a92944-db39-4b7b-bf37-73039b0f02bf@github.com>
References: <i4AnQxc9mHCKXwxbNJgsbgwlXbrL8nkPRSbTdZ8LiTA=.57a92944-db39-4b7b-bf37-73039b0f02bf@github.com>
Message-ID: <EogjuR013Oqe0Q7-H8eEGoUi-qifbR65gLq9lD36FKA=.f95d3244-722c-41a1-8e7d-33a26d77fbc4@github.com>

On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 13:08:27 GMT, Antonio Vieiro <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Clean backport of [JDK-8356096](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8356096) that implements update #179 of ISO-4217 with changes effective from may 2025. This is CPU2025_07-critical-approved, so I moved the PR from jdk11u-dev: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk11u-dev/pull/3038 .
> 
> Tested on Linux with tier1 tests and:
> 
> 
> ==============================
> Test summary
> ==============================
>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
>    jtreg:test/jdk/java/util/Currency/ValidateISO4217.java
>                                                          1     1     0     0   
> ==============================
> TEST SUCCESS
> 
> 
> NOTE: Windows GHA tests were skipped because of [JDK-8358538](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8358538)

GHA failure is infra related. Windows build is caused by the 2019 runner issue. See [JDK-8358538](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8358538).

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u/pull/102#issuecomment-2943305181

From duke at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 08:55:05 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Antonio Vieiro)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:55:05 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u] Integrated: 8356096: ISO 4217 Amendment 179 Update
In-Reply-To: <i4AnQxc9mHCKXwxbNJgsbgwlXbrL8nkPRSbTdZ8LiTA=.57a92944-db39-4b7b-bf37-73039b0f02bf@github.com>
References: <i4AnQxc9mHCKXwxbNJgsbgwlXbrL8nkPRSbTdZ8LiTA=.57a92944-db39-4b7b-bf37-73039b0f02bf@github.com>
Message-ID: <IvRweBUaVzdQkyxbnnGGTMQ5ru8JSWT_PYfBbim64Gs=.57cf9db9-cffa-46ec-8da6-48d19286f92e@github.com>

On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 13:08:27 GMT, Antonio Vieiro <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Clean backport of [JDK-8356096](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8356096) that implements update #179 of ISO-4217 with changes effective from may 2025. This is CPU2025_07-critical-approved, so I moved the PR from jdk11u-dev: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk11u-dev/pull/3038 .
> 
> Tested on Linux with tier1 tests and:
> 
> 
> ==============================
> Test summary
> ==============================
>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR   
>    jtreg:test/jdk/java/util/Currency/ValidateISO4217.java
>                                                          1     1     0     0   
> ==============================
> TEST SUCCESS
> 
> 
> NOTE: Windows GHA tests were skipped because of [JDK-8358538](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8358538)

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 3efaf7a0
Author:    Antonio Vieiro <avieirov at redhat.com>
Committer: Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u/commit/3efaf7a09130ae3cd49c58e3a646954cec29c084
Stats:     11 lines in 4 files changed: 3 ins; 0 del; 8 mod

8356096: ISO 4217 Amendment 179 Update

Backport-of: b8484be137a9d8bf6463188e1fc68b22db0b52c3

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u/pull/102

From rmarchenko at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 09:11:10 2025
From: rmarchenko at openjdk.org (Roman Marchenko)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 09:11:10 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8347826: Introspector shows wrong method list after
 8071693
Message-ID: <SQlanOFo_OVG9AQsm8emtTicODXa6qrMhp0_LNLPC-I=.ced6de90-43ae-4147-9e44-5a4d2bd53bdd@github.com>

This is backport of "8347826: Introspector shows wrong method list after 8071693"

The backport is almost clean, the only conflicts were in copyright year in 2 files.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport c5f235c000db6654493ea109008dbccf97f01678

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3618/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=3618&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8347826
  Stats: 455 lines in 4 files changed: 398 ins; 8 del; 49 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3618.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3618/head:pull/3618

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3618

From goetz at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 09:45:51 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 09:45:51 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u] RFR: 8357105: C2: compilation fails with
 "assert(false) failed: empty program detected during loop optimization"
Message-ID: <2NSVyKQ55TQwOFQ0wmwW-5BP9EMpX5z_4t7yrdjAvkw=.69820ff7-4913-4e09-bbe5-736f667a8fcd@github.com>

I backport this for parity with 21.0.8-oracle.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport a300c356555019a42c19bf0c16184f6dee4ad96e

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u/pull/463/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u&pr=463&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357105
  Stats: 66 lines in 2 files changed: 64 ins; 0 del; 2 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u/pull/463.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u.git pull/463/head:pull/463

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u/pull/463

From goetz at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 09:47:31 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 09:47:31 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u] RFR: 8357105: C2: compilation fails with
 "assert(false) failed: empty program detected during loop optimization"
Message-ID: <NWIGXDeUtyPx-cq4hBx2jwuWAceQ3v4BN7iFYIIOa8U=.db5d3321-163d-4991-8606-95035ea60389@github.com>

I backport this for parity with 17.0.16-oracle

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport a300c356555019a42c19bf0c16184f6dee4ad96e

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u/pull/406/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u&pr=406&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357105
  Stats: 66 lines in 2 files changed: 64 ins; 0 del; 2 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u/pull/406.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u.git pull/406/head:pull/406

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u/pull/406

From dtabata at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 11:04:00 2025
From: dtabata at openjdk.org (Daishi Tabata)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 11:04:00 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8357194: [21u] lible cannot find the path of
 libjava [v2]
In-Reply-To: <lTQAH6cI_JFPpeIjobi4aWf-knCOxmU3Wf4LUjN-yFQ=.d60478a0-5ba0-404c-9ea2-83717b73eb64@github.com>
References: <fhXBwfPli6ZMAT-A2SSBJ7Bwh4ExebTzMZ7cZzjtifk=.308ebf20-f1d6-4dbf-9c10-4d21cc608b00@github.com>
 <lTQAH6cI_JFPpeIjobi4aWf-knCOxmU3Wf4LUjN-yFQ=.d60478a0-5ba0-404c-9ea2-83717b73eb64@github.com>
Message-ID: <Vd6TItW4FzBhLqCNfPEdSceGrDTmqpGUrWuWF2vdEcI=.5466cf51-54fc-4102-ab2a-b8b1ac779b16@github.com>

On Mon, 19 May 2025 01:20:43 GMT, Daishi Tabata <dtabata at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This change adds the?`ORIGIN`?flag to the?`lible`?build, enabling it to find?`libjava`?like other libraries.
>> 
>> It is believed that the ORIGIN flag was accidentally omitted in JDK-8306983, which aimed to provide `le library` (originally only available on Windows) for Linux and macOS as well.
>> 
>> After applying this fix, I have verified that?`lible`?can successfully find?`libjava`?on Linux. For reference, Windows is not affected because the SET_SHARED_LIBRARY_ORIGIN for Windows is empty.
>> 
>> Testing:
>> I have confirmed that all tests in?`:langtools_jshell` test group?pass after this fix.
>
> Daishi Tabata has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   run jcheck

Thank you for review.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1803#issuecomment-2943730175

From duke at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 11:04:00 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (duke)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 11:04:00 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8357194: [21u] lible cannot find the path of
 libjava [v2]
In-Reply-To: <lTQAH6cI_JFPpeIjobi4aWf-knCOxmU3Wf4LUjN-yFQ=.d60478a0-5ba0-404c-9ea2-83717b73eb64@github.com>
References: <fhXBwfPli6ZMAT-A2SSBJ7Bwh4ExebTzMZ7cZzjtifk=.308ebf20-f1d6-4dbf-9c10-4d21cc608b00@github.com>
 <lTQAH6cI_JFPpeIjobi4aWf-knCOxmU3Wf4LUjN-yFQ=.d60478a0-5ba0-404c-9ea2-83717b73eb64@github.com>
Message-ID: <_h2855BEkkb8Y5lMdjHNld0Np28vOYndwjYQab13pKA=.acf8b69a-60ac-45df-8229-7101b5ec50f0@github.com>

On Mon, 19 May 2025 01:20:43 GMT, Daishi Tabata <dtabata at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This change adds the?`ORIGIN`?flag to the?`lible`?build, enabling it to find?`libjava`?like other libraries.
>> 
>> It is believed that the ORIGIN flag was accidentally omitted in JDK-8306983, which aimed to provide `le library` (originally only available on Windows) for Linux and macOS as well.
>> 
>> After applying this fix, I have verified that?`lible`?can successfully find?`libjava`?on Linux. For reference, Windows is not affected because the SET_SHARED_LIBRARY_ORIGIN for Windows is empty.
>> 
>> Testing:
>> I have confirmed that all tests in?`:langtools_jshell` test group?pass after this fix.
>
> Daishi Tabata has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   run jcheck

@tabata-d 
Your change (at version 6e3e06c78b5712aa96d01592d312db1c531f6f6b) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1803#issuecomment-2943732826

From goetz at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 11:34:59 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 11:34:59 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8301793: AlgorithmId should not encode a missing
 parameters field as NULL unless hardcoded
In-Reply-To: <hsrPO0j4v0g_Oboi-0PxUDNVaowh8CDc1urggdHMiWQ=.a0e9ff76-9988-4084-bbef-35940177d4d6@github.com>
References: <hsrPO0j4v0g_Oboi-0PxUDNVaowh8CDc1urggdHMiWQ=.a0e9ff76-9988-4084-bbef-35940177d4d6@github.com>
Message-ID: <ty8XmR65ZniRle2F0qeptNNa77AWpBpDlKyp7VvR2vo=.46372134-97c1-4474-9d3a-78a35de7363d@github.com>

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 11:36:33 GMT, Varada M <varadam at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [a97271e3](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/a97271e3b5d5a08fc503a11cd3e253974fb77ce6) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Weijun Wang on 6 Mar 2023 and was reviewed by Sean Mullan.
> 
> Thanks!

Hi Varada, 
please first get a review, then label for approval.
Please edit the description of the PR and tell why this is not clean.
I'm not sure this is a good backport. Please tell in the approval comment in JBS why you 
want to backport this and give a risk assessment.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3615#issuecomment-2943822026

From mdoerr at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 12:20:58 2025
From: mdoerr at openjdk.org (Martin Doerr)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 12:20:58 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8357793: [PPC64] VM crashes with
 -XX:-UseSIGTRAP -XX:-ImplicitNullChecks
In-Reply-To: <4fPDyysZhozZl4V9_X2bOTHxSLimmp1Htr3WjMHoW9U=.86600e78-4429-4c2a-b4c2-9dd8e07abc47@github.com>
References: <4fPDyysZhozZl4V9_X2bOTHxSLimmp1Htr3WjMHoW9U=.86600e78-4429-4c2a-b4c2-9dd8e07abc47@github.com>
Message-ID: <Xm2x3h5uwxzYtwX4Aicm6p8NNMu7U7H_19GUH_9cfK8=.2537a85c-ee50-4c4f-88fd-46255c407494@github.com>

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 09:26:41 GMT, Martin Doerr <mdoerr at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Almost clean backport of [JDK-8357793](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357793). I only had to change `SharedRuntime` to `StubRoutines` because [JDK-8337987](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8337987) is not in 21.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: fef4c29e
Author:    Martin Doerr <mdoerr at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/fef4c29e5a296c0c689abb25183c243326607614
Stats:     4 lines in 2 files changed: 2 ins; 0 del; 2 mod

8357793: [PPC64] VM crashes with -XX:-UseSIGTRAP -XX:-ImplicitNullChecks

Reviewed-by: phh
Backport-of: ba9f44c90fe8da2d97d67b6878ac2c0c14e35bd0

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1842

From mdoerr at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 12:49:40 2025
From: mdoerr at openjdk.org (Martin Doerr)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 12:49:40 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8357793: [PPC64] VM crashes with -XX:-UseSIGTRAP
 -XX:-ImplicitNullChecks
Message-ID: <TvKtPCo3jQmULTcEiyl5MQr6ftGmgs2XRxJA001MueE=.b701a704-2031-4865-b4e6-ab7b51d60a89@github.com>

Backport of [JDK-8357793](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357793). Version from jdk21u-dev applies cleanly, but `InterpreterMacroAssembler::load_klass_check_null_throw` didn't exist in 17u. I've taken the PPC64 interpreter parts from https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/7cf7e0a20b37522b0c7a97e5269bcd2eed174dbe.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport fef4c29e5a296c0c689abb25183c243326607614

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3619/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=3619&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357793
  Stats: 14 lines in 4 files changed: 8 ins; 2 del; 4 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3619.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3619/head:pull/3619

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3619

From duke at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 13:57:52 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Bara' Hasheesh)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 13:57:52 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Withdrawn: 8312475: org.jline.util.PumpReader signed byte
 problem
In-Reply-To: <ggMgE_zUX26FngLY55JVIGbPCnb6dj487o-HqJ7e1ak=.6f4b6f02-4ef8-4903-b272-8a8c6b2fc8f8@github.com>
References: <ggMgE_zUX26FngLY55JVIGbPCnb6dj487o-HqJ7e1ak=.6f4b6f02-4ef8-4903-b272-8a8c6b2fc8f8@github.com>
Message-ID: <r_6jw9iX-oysiopq1m8mGwvF9PYYj-kp1SsW8q_143Q=.7108de33-cd5b-4f8e-a35e-40f0dec82b3a@github.com>

On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 07:10:57 GMT, Bara' Hasheesh <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Clean Backport JDK-8312475: SonarCloud reports a possible issue in `read` method
> 
> * `buffer.get()` reads a signed byte so it has a range of -128-127
> * When end of file is reached the read method returns -1 signed integer
> 
> When the `buffer.get()` reads -1 => it returns 0xFF as a signed byte value, this causes the SonarCloud to confuse the possibility that the -1 byte value (0xFF), equals the -1 EOF value (0xFFFFFFFF)
> 
> This simply added a casting to & 0xFF to avoid this confusion.

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3536

From phh at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 14:17:57 2025
From: phh at openjdk.org (Paul Hohensee)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 14:17:57 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8346285: Update jarsigner compatibility test
 for change in default digest algorithm
In-Reply-To: <BWZy-opiYk7rMkK0qmuVWgaDAkt1dUanVs_akwGgEBE=.42e1b65c-be4e-4d38-97d5-f0c998839fb2@github.com>
References: <BWZy-opiYk7rMkK0qmuVWgaDAkt1dUanVs_akwGgEBE=.42e1b65c-be4e-4d38-97d5-f0c998839fb2@github.com>
Message-ID: <j7287K6gf6T1qiAlRMJHt592YQSIVWEXAunhlMfWDhU=.0a7f3b4e-9406-4f0d-beb4-466e87d89e4c@github.com>

On Wed, 28 May 2025 19:35:19 GMT, Paul Hohensee <phh at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backport for Oracle 21.0.8 parity. Clean backport, test only, modified test passes.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: a908f3b3
Author:    Paul Hohensee <phh at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/a908f3b3aa56d153bb6a01d22dba8ff2702a0d41
Stats:     10 lines in 1 file changed: 7 ins; 0 del; 3 mod

8346285: Update jarsigner compatibility test for change in default digest algorithm

Backport-of: e7d21fcf4949106e89afd413e9abc47d622dd47a

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1840

From phh at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 14:17:58 2025
From: phh at openjdk.org (Paul Hohensee)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 14:17:58 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] Integrated: 8346285: Update jarsigner compatibility test
 for change in default digest algorithm
In-Reply-To: <VJ-XVLw2CDCigl9z7CkK_H0aOKma3ifRtKY_f-UhfzI=.68270891-a1e0-4a3f-a37a-f3ef930b64bb@github.com>
References: <VJ-XVLw2CDCigl9z7CkK_H0aOKma3ifRtKY_f-UhfzI=.68270891-a1e0-4a3f-a37a-f3ef930b64bb@github.com>
Message-ID: <xr38O3wSe7U5seBrOUDWy177KWK1lFMIMLUnWTrKRCw=.251aacf2-1613-4109-b6c0-62d3e2414f8c@github.com>

On Wed, 28 May 2025 19:30:49 GMT, Paul Hohensee <phh at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backport for Oracle 17.0.16 parity. Clean backport, test only, modified test passes.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: c1c2475e
Author:    Paul Hohensee <phh at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/commit/c1c2475ebca1459213925920d2a173f7979247d3
Stats:     10 lines in 1 file changed: 7 ins; 0 del; 3 mod

8346285: Update jarsigner compatibility test for change in default digest algorithm

Backport-of: e7d21fcf4949106e89afd413e9abc47d622dd47a

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3613

From dtabata at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 14:19:59 2025
From: dtabata at openjdk.org (Daishi Tabata)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 14:19:59 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8357194: [21u] lible cannot find the path of
 libjava
In-Reply-To: <fhXBwfPli6ZMAT-A2SSBJ7Bwh4ExebTzMZ7cZzjtifk=.308ebf20-f1d6-4dbf-9c10-4d21cc608b00@github.com>
References: <fhXBwfPli6ZMAT-A2SSBJ7Bwh4ExebTzMZ7cZzjtifk=.308ebf20-f1d6-4dbf-9c10-4d21cc608b00@github.com>
Message-ID: <-cW7D3rFtX0szrUEBCiUsaKHW7qYKkTZoHg0hI-oS4I=.56648b5b-522e-47fe-b36d-62c2b7ece0a9@github.com>

On Mon, 19 May 2025 01:02:07 GMT, Daishi Tabata <dtabata at openjdk.org> wrote:

> This change adds the?`ORIGIN`?flag to the?`lible`?build, enabling it to find?`libjava`?like other libraries.
> 
> It is believed that the ORIGIN flag was accidentally omitted in JDK-8306983, which aimed to provide `le library` (originally only available on Windows) for Linux and macOS as well.
> 
> After applying this fix, I have verified that?`lible`?can successfully find?`libjava`?on Linux. For reference, Windows is not affected because the SET_SHARED_LIBRARY_ORIGIN for Windows is empty.
> 
> Testing:
> I have confirmed that all tests in?`:langtools_jshell` test group?pass after this fix.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 19f95c20
Author:    Daishi Tabata <dtabata at openjdk.org>
Committer: Paul Hohensee <phh at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/19f95c20b14fe1f6852f789bf22066218ae19f3a
Stats:     3 lines in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 2 mod

8357194: [21u] lible cannot find the path of libjava

Reviewed-by: phh

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1803

From duke at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 15:40:37 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Radek Cap)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 15:40:37 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8348328: Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to
 Version 2025-05-15
Message-ID: <dDFkHQReNl4eGXJXgUwy0qEWTzealdKyLdNTc8_8zZY=.d9eb967c-cd7b-498e-be48-5dc74e9c9238@github.com>

Backport of JDK-8348328 - Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to Version 2025-05-15

The IANA Functions Operator has updated the language subtag registry to "2025-05-15".

Clean backport.
Passed tier1 tests.
Passed gtests.

GH Actions are passing, Windows failures are unrelated.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport f318868268f32934a2f0c4e26a6c75360d8e74b1

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3620/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=3620&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8348328
  Stats: 143 lines in 2 files changed: 135 ins; 1 del; 7 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3620.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3620/head:pull/3620

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3620

From duke at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 15:46:46 2025
From: duke at openjdk.org (Radek Cap)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 15:46:46 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8348328: Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to
 Version 2025-05-15
Message-ID: <XR3blxVxLCoCUev8qHfS3bwgTHv3CRmwHJsaPJmX8e8=.cb51c977-5688-4912-bc09-376f3b960785@github.com>

Backport of JDK-8348328 - Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to Version 2025-05-15

The IANA Functions Operator has updated the language subtag registry to "2025-05-15".

Clean backport.
Passed tier1 tests.
Passed gtests.

GH Actions are passing, Windows failures are unrelated.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport f318868268f32934a2f0c4e26a6c75360d8e74b1

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3043/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk11u-dev&pr=3043&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8348328
  Stats: 143 lines in 2 files changed: 135 ins; 1 del; 7 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3043.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/3043/head:pull/3043

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3043

From phh at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 16:35:59 2025
From: phh at openjdk.org (Paul Hohensee)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 16:35:59 GMT
Subject: [jdk11u-dev] RFR: 8356053: Test
 java/awt/Toolkit/Headless/HeadlessToolkit.java fails by timeout
In-Reply-To: <5UR9_tAgWtW7Lj5M4Oj-27V5aXxfGO79oyRRrbzwOM8=.08535eb1-0921-46ee-9bd8-2779d01b212f@github.com>
References: <5UR9_tAgWtW7Lj5M4Oj-27V5aXxfGO79oyRRrbzwOM8=.08535eb1-0921-46ee-9bd8-2779d01b212f@github.com>
Message-ID: <Lh-dX8yvugkmOfXehMAmjppw1SAxPOyhO1Ela6tBT9s=.f5cfb394-1bbf-49b9-b2f0-3104e6796ded@github.com>

On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 03:17:47 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov <serb at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This pull request contains a backport of commit [375f3dc9](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/375f3dc9ed0f1704e726d0d704420c38a0a5513c) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
> 
> The commit being backported was authored by Sergey Bylokhov on 9 May 2025 and was reviewed by Phil Race and Alexander Zuev.
> 
> The patch doesn't apply cleanly because the deleted lines use a different URL in jdk11u. That's because [JDK-8295470](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8295470) wasn't backported there.
> 
> Thanks!

Marked as reviewed by phh (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3041#pullrequestreview-2901004505

From mbaesken at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 16:53:58 2025
From: mbaesken at openjdk.org (Matthias Baesken)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 16:53:58 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8356269: Fix broken web-links after
 JDK-8295470
In-Reply-To: <HJ3-uxlu9y9vOABR9MqcbjpFOVKKiL7hkv4PIYgdAPA=.01e299b8-4a3f-499e-84e4-c5896ff05b00@github.com>
References: <HJ3-uxlu9y9vOABR9MqcbjpFOVKKiL7hkv4PIYgdAPA=.01e299b8-4a3f-499e-84e4-c5896ff05b00@github.com>
Message-ID: <oD8-0O5cYMSUjv5KOPSkfYDNkuvoelbxhagWjC1QRhg=.5fc24f99-2542-4c9f-8996-8da826b5643f@github.com>

On Wed, 28 May 2025 13:35:00 GMT, Matthias Baesken <mbaesken at openjdk.org> wrote:

> 8356269: Fix broken web-links after JDK-8295470

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 7771a2d3
Author:    Matthias Baesken <mbaesken at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/7771a2d373e419376e0185f66bd01759aa23a078
Stats:     3 lines in 3 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 3 mod

8356269: Fix broken web-links after JDK-8295470

Backport-of: 21f01e0c89e40ae2701d8cb24c737be78f4dcd19

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1838

From mbaesken at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 16:55:57 2025
From: mbaesken at openjdk.org (Matthias Baesken)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 16:55:57 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8351277: Remove pipewire from AIX build
In-Reply-To: <WELbISzTS7-uMsX2967tNkDDPh58OYVczWiZA7wUzx4=.2c785a04-647c-4202-a7e1-2178f6742b6d@github.com>
References: <WELbISzTS7-uMsX2967tNkDDPh58OYVczWiZA7wUzx4=.2c785a04-647c-4202-a7e1-2178f6742b6d@github.com>
Message-ID: <E1hsR5drZfAdIkco6qlLWRJQwEO_ynhB-Wl6ryrpj1U=.8886dee3-6f14-4d6c-a544-5ad581ba39d1@github.com>

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 12:38:55 GMT, Matthias Baesken <mbaesken at openjdk.org> wrote:

> makefile needs adjustments, screencast_pipewire.c diffs in the stride + COPYRIGHT info

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 0c697daf
Author:    Matthias Baesken <mbaesken at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/0c697daf474b580cd447db1cb86b09c85a251175
Stats:     42 lines in 4 files changed: 35 ins; 4 del; 3 mod

8351277: Remove pipewire from AIX build

Reviewed-by: mdoerr
Backport-of: 6bc480358c80b0a1a94b5ca5f4b7ff2d84ce8e37

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1844

From mbaesken at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 16:57:56 2025
From: mbaesken at openjdk.org (Matthias Baesken)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 16:57:56 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8355979: ATTRIBUTE_NO_UBSAN needs to be
 extended to handle float divisions by zero on AIX
In-Reply-To: <BusIGzV0-LP1eOFkof3WM-YCNLTPeO9pL_7cPDsHcGg=.70751078-ac1a-4284-b7bb-c5b764bc3598@github.com>
References: <BusIGzV0-LP1eOFkof3WM-YCNLTPeO9pL_7cPDsHcGg=.70751078-ac1a-4284-b7bb-c5b764bc3598@github.com>
Message-ID: <ku7wQVnFrLoFInz_aWOFd1EE3IlaUWAi4f4Pf4YFDLI=.0715051f-75cb-496e-a162-f9aa9c77fd95@github.com>

On Wed, 28 May 2025 13:33:27 GMT, Matthias Baesken <mbaesken at openjdk.org> wrote:

> 8355979: ATTRIBUTE_NO_UBSAN needs to be extended to handle float divisions by zero on AIX

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: ec3bc56a
Author:    Matthias Baesken <mbaesken at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/ec3bc56acf601455c793b3f2fe2f465346db4686
Stats:     12 lines in 2 files changed: 6 ins; 0 del; 6 mod

8355979: ATTRIBUTE_NO_UBSAN needs to be extended to handle float divisions by zero on AIX

Backport-of: 088825ed889551e6067d46bf77fe4d30a3972da1

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1837

From ssubramaniam at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 16:58:59 2025
From: ssubramaniam at openjdk.org (Satyen Subramaniam)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 16:58:59 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8313355:
 javax/management/remote/mandatory/notif/ListenerScaleTest.java failed with
 "Exception: Failed: ratio=792.2791601423487"
In-Reply-To: <IxVpOxZCIkUiePDhODR8MYvgVvaxzZkS4XU9NQraV24=.9e0a6c37-ae15-49b9-bde4-eb1c80d7cbf7@github.com>
References: <IxVpOxZCIkUiePDhODR8MYvgVvaxzZkS4XU9NQraV24=.9e0a6c37-ae15-49b9-bde4-eb1c80d7cbf7@github.com>
Message-ID: <jSKzF906yOOiorCLbZBUEFkdfQPu-lY2Ts0DSSbQAxo=.ebd2e360-2c2b-4283-9edb-7ba2e74c1e16@github.com>

On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 17:17:08 GMT, Satyen Subramaniam <ssubramaniam at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Backporting JDK-8313355: javax/management/remote/mandatory/notif/ListenerScaleTest.java failed with "Exception: Failed: ratio=792.2791601423487". The `javax/management/remote/mandatory/notif/ListenerScaleTest.java` test fails intermittently - this change preserves the function of the test, while minimizing/removing intermittent failures. Specifically, the test exists to check that notification work does not scale linearly with number of MBeans, so it calculates a ratio of the time taken with one, and with 20,000 MBeans. We can increase the point at which that calculated ratio is considered a failure: original commit chooses 2500. Ran GHA Sanity Checks, local Tier 1 and 2, and adjusted test. Patch is clean.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 2ac7476f
Author:    Satyen Subramaniam <ssubramaniam at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/2ac7476f11f5c4e71f52a9e6f72624df874d680d
Stats:     4 lines in 1 file changed: 2 ins; 0 del; 2 mod

8313355: javax/management/remote/mandatory/notif/ListenerScaleTest.java failed with "Exception: Failed: ratio=792.2791601423487"

Backport-of: debf0ecfb0076f5513595c74038215520d630764

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1849

From mbaesken at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 17:02:55 2025
From: mbaesken at openjdk.org (Matthias Baesken)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 17:02:55 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] Integrated: 8353568: SEGV_BNDERR signal code adjust
 definition
In-Reply-To: <85ywgN6ei6KlUGcin6Q8PCYJAHpeZqoeadyyHH6H1Y0=.2a2f26e7-bccc-4c34-ac3b-06b1e995d81c@github.com>
References: <85ywgN6ei6KlUGcin6Q8PCYJAHpeZqoeadyyHH6H1Y0=.2a2f26e7-bccc-4c34-ac3b-06b1e995d81c@github.com>
Message-ID: <vnzFS0azbVGilB5oFTuz-0syaXfDzLRHHacfeMNIxgA=.4a623c97-25aa-4653-856e-8980e820fafd@github.com>

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 12:30:28 GMT, Matthias Baesken <mbaesken at openjdk.org> wrote:

> 8353568: SEGV_BNDERR signal code adjust definition

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 11ffcd56
Author:    Matthias Baesken <mbaesken at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/commit/11ffcd56e259fd3a8f57991a40be897d0af87337
Stats:     6 lines in 1 file changed: 4 ins; 0 del; 2 mod

8353568: SEGV_BNDERR signal code adjust definition

Backport-of: 6abf4e6d4d9f948b8ae51aec731b94ba7acd022e

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1843

From goetz at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 18:49:51 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 18:49:51 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8285773: Replace Algorithms.eatMemory(...) with
 WB.fullGC() in vmTestbase/gc/gctests/ReferencesGC/ReferencesGC.java
Message-ID: <IotfKqLyGCgdrhZTFxfN0dZrryaLdiOCKqHt5fSa-50=.f33e0858-5fb6-4f23-8fac-310e16f975e9@github.com>

I backport this for parity with 17.0.17-oracle.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 95d38bbd6b33a965b2312fd9409c6879ca2772ab

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3622/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=3622&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8285773
  Stats: 31 lines in 1 file changed: 7 ins; 11 del; 13 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3622.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3622/head:pull/3622

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3622

From goetz at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 18:51:01 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 18:51:01 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8285951: Replace Algorithms.eatMemory(...) with
 WB.fullGC() in vmTestbase_vm_gc_ref tests
Message-ID: <jN6TuchTwfkCx9DV1eOxB4tSTu9CLLyOWEVmMroP6ZM=.acfc04ba-d256-4572-a6df-29f135a06a91@github.com>

I backport this for parity with 17.0.17-oracle.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 61cb4b7448e96cb1ae218af4c39f44a5c66c0f9f

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3623/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=3623&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8285951
  Stats: 924 lines in 28 files changed: 117 ins; 557 del; 250 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3623.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3623/head:pull/3623

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3623

From andrew at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 20:03:49 2025
From: andrew at openjdk.org (Andrew John Hughes)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 20:03:49 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8358538: Update GHA Windows runner to 2025
In-Reply-To: <pFpGZ-xUuawMJCNdGXwPcLtklSUQlNjwYgRxwcjFoUE=.89f73fbc-d05f-4aee-be73-0290822a18ff@github.com>
References: <vH_46Q0gZ4PoPkvYrcTllF1S1-5ptwK5GzmFvDqaMFA=.314f6040-38bd-4492-8fdd-ea3594fbe6c4@github.com>
 <pFpGZ-xUuawMJCNdGXwPcLtklSUQlNjwYgRxwcjFoUE=.89f73fbc-d05f-4aee-be73-0290822a18ff@github.com>
Message-ID: <mcw3q_X4xeVSOSQLBzBhGRrdAlOB99I1k6GfXAwwI9I=.498437ac-4bfb-4edb-8c89-7da0dc42d28f@github.com>

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:06:05 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Of course there are build failures. And of course they are confusing:
> 
> ```
> === Output from failing command(s) repeated here ===
> * For target hotspot_variant-server_libjvm_gtest_objs_test_enableIf.obj:
> test_enableIf.cpp
> d:\a\jdk21u-dev\jdk21u-dev\test\hotspot\gtest\metaprogramming\test_enableIf.cpp(74): error C2244: 'TestEnableIfNested<T>::sub1': unable to match function definition to an existing declaration
> d:\a\jdk21u-dev\jdk21u-dev\test\hotspot\gtest\metaprogramming\test_enableIf.cpp(74): note: see declaration of 'TestEnableIfNested<T>::sub1'
> d:\a\jdk21u-dev\jdk21u-dev\test\hotspot\gtest\metaprogramming\test_enableIf.cpp(74): note: definition
> d:\a\jdk21u-dev\jdk21u-dev\test\hotspot\gtest\metaprogramming\test_enableIf.cpp(74): note: 'U TestEnableIfNested<T>::sub1(U)'
> d:\a\jdk21u-dev\jdk21u-dev\test\hotspot\gtest\metaprogramming\test_enableIf.cpp(74): note: existing declarations
> d:\a\jdk21u-dev\jdk21u-dev\test\hotspot\gtest\metaprogramming\test_enableIf.cpp(69): note: 'U TestEnableIfNested<T>::sub1(U)'
> ```
> 
> Exactly the same code compiles fine in mainline...

The one difference I see between the 21u and trunk version is the lack of `precompiled.hpp` in trunk, as it is specified on the command line instead ([JDK-8347909](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8347909)).

It might be worth trying 24u and seeing if it fails in the same way, though not worth fixing this there at this point in its lifecycle.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1853#issuecomment-2945973827

From andrew at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 20:06:05 2025
From: andrew at openjdk.org (Andrew John Hughes)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 20:06:05 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8358538: Update GHA Windows runner to 2025
In-Reply-To: <Q2-tVhRJQcn7nRPQxH7K0Ffe-jpLX_86uY5k8Cgcq_M=.7f76ea90-cc7a-4bc4-a831-844185674bff@github.com>
References: <Q2-tVhRJQcn7nRPQxH7K0Ffe-jpLX_86uY5k8Cgcq_M=.7f76ea90-cc7a-4bc4-a831-844185674bff@github.com>
Message-ID: <btZ30TgTGzMzqOyZlFpY7XM5nKu0-seVBfqWry0GJ7I=.5d674884-3c7d-4a03-9a2f-5a2c2338fe29@github.com>

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:02:33 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Fixes GHA. Current Windows runners are already in brown-out stage, and will be decommissioned by the end of the month. So we need to get it into update repos soon.
> 
> Additional testing:
>  - [ ] GHA

Looks like this one is failing in the same way as [21u](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk21u-dev/pull/1853#issuecomment-2943172058)

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3617#issuecomment-2945982671

From goetz at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 20:32:06 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 20:32:06 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8264207: CodeStrings does not honour fixed address
 assumption.
Message-ID: <hOV2SrKFnsiapDf30JfKuXPGuWxpQ1aQ6eOdR-FQVvs=.2ecb28f1-14f3-4791-a228-737f9dece410@github.com>

I backport this for parity with 17.0.17-oracle.

Three files needed trivial resolves, it might end up being clean.

src/hotspot/share/asm/codeBuffer.cpp
src/hotspot/share/code/codeBlob.cpp
src/hotspot/share/interpreter/interpreter.hpp
Trivial resolves

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Add test file
 - Resolved Chunks
 - Backport 7bd4f496b493b804990615f6ce2cb1b4abd29a86

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3621/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=3621&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8264207
  Stats: 889 lines in 16 files changed: 537 ins; 129 del; 223 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3621.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3621/head:pull/3621

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3621

From goetz at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 20:45:35 2025
From: goetz at openjdk.org (Goetz Lindenmaier)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 20:45:35 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8294839: Disable StressLongCountedLoop in
 compiler/loopopts/TestRemoveEmptyLoop.java
Message-ID: <gzdRSHzH2ThOemAnReJZCPjbHSvSxwbrA4mZbmtV-XY=.9835c656-9eb2-49b3-a989-11b7006c8f66@github.com>

I backport this for parity with 17.0.17-oracle.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 73f06468ae7f9eebb8e37f2a534d2c19a8dac60d

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3624/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk17u-dev&pr=3624&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8294839
  Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 1 ins; 0 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3624.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3624/head:pull/3624

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3624

From phh at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 20:45:55 2025
From: phh at openjdk.org (Paul Hohensee)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 20:45:55 GMT
Subject: [jdk17u-dev] RFR: 8264207: CodeStrings does not honour fixed
 address assumption.
In-Reply-To: <hOV2SrKFnsiapDf30JfKuXPGuWxpQ1aQ6eOdR-FQVvs=.2ecb28f1-14f3-4791-a228-737f9dece410@github.com>
References: <hOV2SrKFnsiapDf30JfKuXPGuWxpQ1aQ6eOdR-FQVvs=.2ecb28f1-14f3-4791-a228-737f9dece410@github.com>
Message-ID: <pfZMAgfarzD8q9JXgDVc9Z5Mk_3bn0E0Os9wloFkGkw=.ffab631c-01c0-4ba3-aa8e-c33405decadc@github.com>

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 16:12:05 GMT, Goetz Lindenmaier <goetz at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I backport this for parity with 17.0.17-oracle.
> 
> Three files needed trivial resolves, it might end up being clean.
> 
> src/hotspot/share/asm/codeBuffer.cpp
> src/hotspot/share/code/codeBlob.cpp
> src/hotspot/share/interpreter/interpreter.hpp
> Trivial resolves

Marked as reviewed by phh (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3621#pullrequestreview-2902258919

From ssubramaniam at openjdk.org  Thu Jun  5 21:13:36 2025
From: ssubramaniam at openjdk.org (Satyen Subramaniam)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 21:13:36 GMT
Subject: [jdk21u-dev] RFR: 8327125: SpinYield.report should report microseconds
Message-ID: <OoMoOYab9xgPFX93V-DoRzI2u_ztvfsrtvmZ7JbtCco=.f99fbddf-f640-4833-8663-fb5eb32b75ef@github.com>

Backporting JDK-8327125: SpinYield.report should report microseconds. This change adjusts function logic to provide microsecond granularity (as indicated by output), rather than erroneous millisecond granularity. Ran GHA Sanity Checks and local Tier 1 and 2, Patch is clean.

-------------

Commit messages:
 - Backport 8cfacebd06da3a45d119b5378ce0c2dd591d2442

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1854/files
  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21u-dev&pr=1854&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8327125
  Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1854.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1854/head:pull/1854

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1854