About backporting 8364343 fix to jdk25u

[Lindenmaier, Goetz]

Hi Kent,

This is a huge change.  Backporting it is not trivial and will impose quite a risk.
It already caused two follow-up issues.
Are you sure the whole change is needed?
With a better description of your problem maybe we
can identify a smaller, more directed fix for the issue?

Best regards,
  Goetz.

From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-retn at openjdk.org> On Behalf Of Kent Dong
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 3:42 AM
To: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev at openjdk.org>
Subject: About backporting 8364343 fix to jdk25u

Some people who received this message don't often get email from ch3cho at qq.com<mailto:ch3cho at qq.com>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
Dear guys,

We encountered a JVM crash with SEGV issue related to the bug 8364343 "Virtual Thread transition management needs to be independent of JVM TI" (https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8364343) when using OpenJDK 25.0.1.  However, the bug is fixed in 26 and doesn't have the "jdk25u-fix-request" label on it. We wonder whether the patch would be backported to jdk25u project or we would have to use the non-LTS version 26 to work it around. Thanks.

Sincerely Yours,
Kent Dong
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jdk-updates-dev/attachments/20260127/dd93e6bd/attachment-0001.htm>