8050818: add static java.util.Predicate.not(Predicate) method + questions about contribution

Martijn Verburg martijnverburg at gmail.com
Fri Feb 17 12:08:47 UTC 2017


Hi Thomas,

See the Contribution Guide (http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/).  You'll
need to have your OCA signed, then it's a good idea to discuss the bug /
change on the appropriate mailing list (which would be core-libs in this
case I think).

Assuming everyone is in agreement with how it should be implemented, you'd
submit a signed patch via the webrev tool (hopefully this is explained in
the contribution guide).

If you get stuck then the adoption-discuss mailing list is a good place to
go for help.


Cheers,
Martijn

On 16 February 2017 at 07:32, Thomas Shields <me at thomasshields.net> wrote:

> Apologies, I intended to include a link to the feature request [1] in my
> previous email but fat-fingered the send button.
>
> Best,
> -T
>
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8050818
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 2:23 AM Thomas Shields <thomas.shields at gatech.edu>
> wrote:
>
> > Greetings all,
> > I'm interested in beginning to contribute to the JDK and identified this
> > feature request [1] that reflected a desire of mine as well. I figured
> with
> > JDK9 development wrapping up I could focus on JDK10.
> >
> > I know this is a public-facing API change, so I'm curious what the
> > procedure is for beginning work on these kinds of tickets.
> >
> > Also, I noticed that the task is "assigned" on JBS to someone but I can't
> > find any indication any work has been done yet. Is it alright for me to
> > work on it?
> >
> > Finally, if the feature is desirable, may I submit a patch directly to
> > this group, or do I need to undergo some kind of approval process first?
> >
> > All the best,
> > Thomas Shields
> > --
> >
> > Sent from my phone
> >
> --
>
> Sent from my phone
>


More information about the jdk10-dev mailing list