From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Jul 5 15:33:58 2017 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Se=c3=a1n_Coffey?=) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 16:33:58 +0100 Subject: Result: New JDK 10 Reviewer: Dmitry Markov Message-ID: <1b88399c-064c-f36d-1180-926687679785@oracle.com> Voting for Dmitry Markov [1] is now closed. Yes: 12 Veto: 0 Abstain: 0 According to the Bylaws definition of Three-Vote Consensus, this is sufficient to approve the nomination. regards, Sean. [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk10-dev/2017-June/000297.html From shade at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 16:23:01 2017 From: shade at redhat.com (Aleksey Shipilev) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 18:23:01 +0200 Subject: jdk10/hs -> jdk10/jdk10 integrations? Message-ID: Hi, I am trying to understand the relationship between jdk10/hs and jdk10/jdk10. Naively, I would assume it has the same relationship as jdk9/dev and jdk9/jdk9: e.g. the development is going on in /dev or /hs, and then jdkX/jdkX serves as integration+release repository, and then regular integrations are happening to jdkX/jdkX. But it seems that jdk10/jdk10 is missing some changesets that are in jdk10/hs for months now, see e.g: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/hs/hotspot/rev/ae91ec8b554a http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/hotspot/log?rev=ae91ec8b554a Do I understand it right that regular integrations are not happening yet? (This would probably force shenandoah/jdk10 forest to upstream from a less stable jdk10/hs, not jdk10/jdk10, which is unfortunate, but not the end of the world) Thanks, -Aleksey From joe.darcy at oracle.com Thu Jul 6 16:56:06 2017 From: joe.darcy at oracle.com (joe darcy) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 09:56:06 -0700 Subject: jdk10/hs -> jdk10/jdk10 integrations? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <68b27f2a-3d53-f2d1-566f-d203eeb026dc@oracle.com> Hi Aleksey, On 7/6/2017 9:23 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to understand the relationship between jdk10/hs and jdk10/jdk10. > Naively, I would assume it has the same relationship as jdk9/dev and jdk9/jdk9: > e.g. the development is going on in /dev or /hs, and then jdkX/jdkX serves as > integration+release repository, and then regular integrations are happening to > jdkX/jdkX. > > But it seems that jdk10/jdk10 is missing some changesets that are in jdk10/hs > for months now, see e.g: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/hs/hotspot/rev/ae91ec8b554a > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/hotspot/log?rev=ae91ec8b554a > > Do I understand it right that regular integrations are not happening yet? > > (This would probably force shenandoah/jdk10 forest to upstream from a less > stable jdk10/hs, not jdk10/jdk10, which is unfortunate, but not the end of the > world) > The relationship that is naive to assume is the correct one, but isn't fully implemented yet since, as you've noticed, there haven't been any hs -> master integrations in JDK 10 yet. (We're working on some new internal infrastructure to support integrations and it isn't fully in place.) Having integrations occurring is a precondition for the planned repo consolidation, which is targeted for September: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk10-dev/2017-June/000371.html HTH, -Joe From shade at redhat.com Thu Jul 6 17:08:25 2017 From: shade at redhat.com (Aleksey Shipilev) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 19:08:25 +0200 Subject: jdk10/hs -> jdk10/jdk10 integrations? In-Reply-To: <68b27f2a-3d53-f2d1-566f-d203eeb026dc@oracle.com> References: <68b27f2a-3d53-f2d1-566f-d203eeb026dc@oracle.com> Message-ID: Hi Joe, On 07/06/2017 06:56 PM, joe darcy wrote: > On 7/6/2017 9:23 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: >> I am trying to understand the relationship between jdk10/hs and jdk10/jdk10. >> Naively, I would assume it has the same relationship as jdk9/dev and jdk9/jdk9: >> e.g. the development is going on in /dev or /hs, and then jdkX/jdkX serves as >> integration+release repository, and then regular integrations are happening to >> jdkX/jdkX. > > The relationship that is naive to assume is the correct one, but isn't fully > implemented yet since, as you've noticed, there haven't been any hs -> master > integrations in JDK 10 yet. (We're working on some new internal infrastructure > to support integrations and it isn't fully in place.) > > Having integrations occurring is a precondition for the planned repo > consolidation, which is targeted for September: > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk10-dev/2017-June/000371.html So, that means jdk10/hs -> jdk10/jdk10 integration would start happening *before* repo consolidation, right? We can use jdk10/hs as the basis for Shenandoah, because we will have to integrate through that anyway. Too bad jdk10/sandbox does not have jdk10/hs changes too, it seems: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/hs/hotspot/rev/ae91ec8b554a http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/sandbox/hotspot/log?rev=ae91ec8b554a Which means whatever we are doing in sandboxes is not getting exposed to jdk10 mainline work... Thanks, -Aleksey From joe.darcy at oracle.com Thu Jul 6 22:43:46 2017 From: joe.darcy at oracle.com (Joseph D. Darcy) Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 15:43:46 -0700 Subject: jdk10/hs -> jdk10/jdk10 integrations? In-Reply-To: References: <68b27f2a-3d53-f2d1-566f-d203eeb026dc@oracle.com> Message-ID: <595EBD22.7030002@oracle.com> Hi Aleksey, On 7/6/2017 10:08 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: > Hi Joe, > > On 07/06/2017 06:56 PM, joe darcy wrote: >> On 7/6/2017 9:23 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: >>> I am trying to understand the relationship between jdk10/hs and jdk10/jdk10. >>> Naively, I would assume it has the same relationship as jdk9/dev and jdk9/jdk9: >>> e.g. the development is going on in /dev or /hs, and then jdkX/jdkX serves as >>> integration+release repository, and then regular integrations are happening to >>> jdkX/jdkX. >> The relationship that is naive to assume is the correct one, but isn't fully >> implemented yet since, as you've noticed, there haven't been any hs -> master >> integrations in JDK 10 yet. (We're working on some new internal infrastructure >> to support integrations and it isn't fully in place.) >> >> Having integrations occurring is a precondition for the planned repo >> consolidation, which is targeted for September: >> >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk10-dev/2017-June/000371.html > So, that means jdk10/hs -> jdk10/jdk10 integration would start happening > *before* repo consolidation, right? Correct; both hs and client will need to integration to jdk10/jdk10 before the consolidation. > > We can use jdk10/hs as the basis for Shenandoah, because we will have to > integrate through that anyway. Too bad jdk10/sandbox does not have jdk10/hs > changes too, it seems: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/hs/hotspot/rev/ae91ec8b554a > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/sandbox/hotspot/log?rev=ae91ec8b554a > > Which means whatever we are doing in sandboxes is not getting exposed to jdk10 > mainline work... > The sandbox is being synced with jdk10/jdk10. Cheers, -Joe From volker.simonis at gmail.com Fri Jul 7 09:48:43 2017 From: volker.simonis at gmail.com (Volker Simonis) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:48:43 +0200 Subject: jdk10/hs -> jdk10/jdk10 integrations? In-Reply-To: <595EBD22.7030002@oracle.com> References: <68b27f2a-3d53-f2d1-566f-d203eeb026dc@oracle.com> <595EBD22.7030002@oracle.com> Message-ID: On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote: > Hi Aleksey, > > On 7/6/2017 10:08 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: >> >> Hi Joe, >> >> On 07/06/2017 06:56 PM, joe darcy wrote: >>> >>> On 7/6/2017 9:23 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: >>>> >>>> I am trying to understand the relationship between jdk10/hs and >>>> jdk10/jdk10. >>>> Naively, I would assume it has the same relationship as jdk9/dev and >>>> jdk9/jdk9: >>>> e.g. the development is going on in /dev or /hs, and then jdkX/jdkX >>>> serves as >>>> integration+release repository, and then regular integrations are >>>> happening to >>>> jdkX/jdkX. >>> >>> The relationship that is naive to assume is the correct one, but isn't >>> fully >>> implemented yet since, as you've noticed, there haven't been any hs -> >>> master >>> integrations in JDK 10 yet. (We're working on some new internal >>> infrastructure >>> to support integrations and it isn't fully in place.) >>> >>> Having integrations occurring is a precondition for the planned repo >>> consolidation, which is targeted for September: >>> >>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk10-dev/2017-June/000371.html >> >> So, that means jdk10/hs -> jdk10/jdk10 integration would start happening >> *before* repo consolidation, right? > > > Correct; both hs and client will need to integration to jdk10/jdk10 before > the consolidation. > What about the other way round? It seems that jdk10/hs and jdk10/client are still synced with jdk10/jdk10. Is that correct? I'm asking because I want to push a change to the top-level test directory. So if I push that to jdk10/jdk10 it will eventually arrive in jdk10/hs even before the jdk10/hs -> jdk10/jdk10 integration would start, right? Regards, Volker >> >> We can use jdk10/hs as the basis for Shenandoah, because we will have to >> integrate through that anyway. Too bad jdk10/sandbox does not have >> jdk10/hs >> changes too, it seems: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/hs/hotspot/rev/ae91ec8b554a >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/sandbox/hotspot/log?rev=ae91ec8b554a >> >> Which means whatever we are doing in sandboxes is not getting exposed to >> jdk10 >> mainline work... >> > > The sandbox is being synced with jdk10/jdk10. > > Cheers, > > -Joe > From philip.race at oracle.com Fri Jul 7 13:59:51 2017 From: philip.race at oracle.com (Philip Race) Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 06:59:51 -0700 Subject: jdk10/hs -> jdk10/jdk10 integrations? In-Reply-To: References: <68b27f2a-3d53-f2d1-566f-d203eeb026dc@oracle.com> <595EBD22.7030002@oracle.com> Message-ID: <595F93D7.2010302@oracle.com> For jdk10/client, it is synced down from jdk10/jdk10 on a regular basis. Last time was yesterday. -phil. On 7/7/17, 2:48 AM, Volker Simonis wrote: > What about the other way round? It seems that jdk10/hs and > jdk10/client are still synced with jdk10/jdk10. Is that correct? From vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com Fri Jul 7 14:54:54 2017 From: vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com (Vladimir Kozlov) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 07:54:54 -0700 Subject: jdk10/hs -> jdk10/jdk10 integrations? In-Reply-To: <595F93D7.2010302@oracle.com> References: <68b27f2a-3d53-f2d1-566f-d203eeb026dc@oracle.com> <595EBD22.7030002@oracle.com> <595F93D7.2010302@oracle.com> Message-ID: <9f3d014f-ceee-7271-a2e4-656b19e2b57c@oracle.com> Same for jdk10/hs. About once per week we sync from jdk10/jdk10. Vladimir On 7/7/17 6:59 AM, Philip Race wrote: > For jdk10/client, it is synced down from jdk10/jdk10 on a regular basis. > Last time was yesterday. > > -phil. > > On 7/7/17, 2:48 AM, Volker Simonis wrote: >> What about the other way round? It seems that jdk10/hs and >> jdk10/client are still synced with jdk10/jdk10. Is that correct? From Alan.Bateman at oracle.com Fri Jul 7 15:06:01 2017 From: Alan.Bateman at oracle.com (Alan Bateman) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 16:06:01 +0100 Subject: jdk10/hs -> jdk10/jdk10 integrations? In-Reply-To: <9f3d014f-ceee-7271-a2e4-656b19e2b57c@oracle.com> References: <68b27f2a-3d53-f2d1-566f-d203eeb026dc@oracle.com> <595EBD22.7030002@oracle.com> <595F93D7.2010302@oracle.com> <9f3d014f-ceee-7271-a2e4-656b19e2b57c@oracle.com> Message-ID: On 07/07/2017 15:54, Vladimir Kozlov wrote: > Same for jdk10/hs. About once per week we sync from jdk10/jdk10. > > Vladimir There are ~300 or so changes backed up in jdk10/hs. I understand there will be sorted out by September but that it is several months away and would be good to get the changes into jdk10/jdk10 sooner to avoid too much divergence. -Alan From stefan.karlsson at oracle.com Mon Jul 10 07:27:07 2017 From: stefan.karlsson at oracle.com (Stefan Karlsson) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 09:27:07 +0200 Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Result:_New_JDK_10_Committer:_Erik_=c3=96sterlund?= Message-ID: Voting for Erik ?sterlund [1] is now closed. Yes: 24 Veto: 0 Abstain: 3 According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is sufficient to approve the nomination. Stefan Karlsson [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk10-dev/2017-June/000306.html From joe.darcy at oracle.com Tue Jul 11 01:15:16 2017 From: joe.darcy at oracle.com (joe darcy) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 18:15:16 -0700 Subject: FYI, CSR JIRA dashboard available Message-ID: <3dc5f34e-7ebb-3760-c394-d1e3865cc0df@oracle.com> Hello, FYI, a simple dashboard for CSR issues is viewable at: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=17313 The issues are grouped into three categories: * Under review by the CSR (requests with a status of Proposed or Finalized) * Recently approved (last two weeks) * Pended, making progress on the issue will generally require action from the assignee Those wishing to track in more detail the progress of CSRs as they proceed through the process could subscribe to a filter over the requests. Two filters that may be of interest are: approved-jdk-csr-issues-within-1-day approved-jdk-csr-issues-within-7-days With a filter subscription, JIRA runs a query periodically and emails the results to the account owner. For example, to get a daily report on CSR issues approved that day, subscribe to the approved-jdk-csr-issues-within-1-day filter with a frequency of once a day. Cheers, -Joe From martinrb at google.com Tue Jul 11 03:21:35 2017 From: martinrb at google.com (Martin Buchholz) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:21:35 -0700 Subject: FYI, CSR JIRA dashboard available In-Reply-To: <3dc5f34e-7ebb-3760-c394-d1e3865cc0df@oracle.com> References: <3dc5f34e-7ebb-3760-c394-d1e3865cc0df@oracle.com> Message-ID: I have some private JIRA filters, but don't know of any way to create public ones. Am I missing something? Dashboards seem like a layer over filters. Is it OK for ordinary developers to create private and/or public dashboards? From joe.darcy at oracle.com Tue Jul 11 03:31:11 2017 From: joe.darcy at oracle.com (joe darcy) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:31:11 -0700 Subject: FYI, CSR JIRA dashboard available In-Reply-To: References: <3dc5f34e-7ebb-3760-c394-d1e3865cc0df@oracle.com> Message-ID: <63ab3478-ae8f-073a-c865-6cfe3115ef3f@oracle.com> On 7/10/2017 8:21 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote: > I have some private JIRA filters, but don't know of any way to create > public ones. Am I missing something? If you select a filter, hit "Details", and then "Edit Permissions", you can make your filters usable by others. > > Dashboards seem like a layer over filters. Is it OK for ordinary > developers to create private and/or public dashboards? Sure. Note that a common gotcha is to create a dashboard, but forget to make the filters populating the dashboard public. HTH, -Joe From martinrb at google.com Tue Jul 11 03:53:26 2017 From: martinrb at google.com (Martin Buchholz) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:53:26 -0700 Subject: FYI, CSR JIRA dashboard available In-Reply-To: <63ab3478-ae8f-073a-c865-6cfe3115ef3f@oracle.com> References: <3dc5f34e-7ebb-3760-c394-d1e3865cc0df@oracle.com> <63ab3478-ae8f-073a-c865-6cfe3115ef3f@oracle.com> Message-ID: On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:31 PM, joe darcy wrote: > On 7/10/2017 8:21 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote: > >> I have some private JIRA filters, but don't know of any way to create >> public ones. Am I missing something? >> > > If you select a filter, hit "Details", and then "Edit Permissions", you > can make your filters usable by others. > > Nope. My "Details" shows me Permissions This filter is only visible to you. but no "Edit Permissions". From philip.race at oracle.com Wed Jul 12 19:25:50 2017 From: philip.race at oracle.com (Phil Race) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 12:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Subject: gradle won't run with JDK 10. Message-ID: <8c7f00db-e1de-96de-9f0c-8454be277223@oracle.com> I just found out yesterday that gradle does not run at all with JDK 10 since it refuses to run with JDK versions it does not recognise. I don't think there is anything we can do on the JDK side so I filed a bug against gradle https://github.com/gradle/gradle/issues/2454 and am sending this just so folks who might be interested are aware .. -phil. From joe.darcy at oracle.com Wed Jul 12 21:02:41 2017 From: joe.darcy at oracle.com (Joseph D. Darcy) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:02:41 -0700 Subject: FYI, CSR JIRA dashboard available In-Reply-To: References: <3dc5f34e-7ebb-3760-c394-d1e3865cc0df@oracle.com> <63ab3478-ae8f-073a-c865-6cfe3115ef3f@oracle.com> Message-ID: <59668E71.7030400@oracle.com> Hi Martin, We've made a configuration change in JBS; please try again. Cheers, -Joe On 7/10/2017 8:53 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:31 PM, joe darcy > wrote: > > On 7/10/2017 8:21 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote: > > I have some private JIRA filters, but don't know of any way to > create public ones. Am I missing something? > > > If you select a filter, hit "Details", and then "Edit > Permissions", you can make your filters usable by others. > > > Nope. My "Details" shows me > > > Permissions > > This filter is only visible to you. > > > but no "Edit Permissions". From martinrb at google.com Wed Jul 12 21:15:42 2017 From: martinrb at google.com (Martin Buchholz) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:15:42 -0700 Subject: FYI, CSR JIRA dashboard available In-Reply-To: <59668E71.7030400@oracle.com> References: <3dc5f34e-7ebb-3760-c394-d1e3865cc0df@oracle.com> <63ab3478-ae8f-073a-c865-6cfe3115ef3f@oracle.com> <59668E71.7030400@oracle.com> Message-ID: Thanks, seems to be working now! On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote: > Hi Martin, > > We've made a configuration change in JBS; please try again. > > Cheers, > > -Joe > > On 7/10/2017 8:53 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:31 PM, joe darcy wrote: > >> On 7/10/2017 8:21 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote: >> >>> I have some private JIRA filters, but don't know of any way to create >>> public ones. Am I missing something? >>> >> >> If you select a filter, hit "Details", and then "Edit Permissions", you >> can make your filters usable by others. >> >> > Nope. My "Details" shows me > > Permissions > > This filter is only visible to you. > > > but no "Edit Permissions". > > > > From jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com Thu Jul 13 00:30:48 2017 From: jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com (Jonathan Gibbons) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:30:48 -0700 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Andrey Nazarov In-Reply-To: <580964F4.6040106@oracle.com> References: <580964F4.6040106@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> In a vote last year, Andrey was voted to be a JDK 9 Committer. However, the vote did not occur in time for him to be grandfathered into the JDK 10 project when that was created. So ... I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 10 Committer. Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of patches, mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ repository. He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by javac, and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, which have also been incorporated into JDK 9 and hence into JDK 10. See: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have now been included in JDK 9 and hence JDK 10. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 Votes are due by the end of July 26, 2017. Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list. For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. -- Jonathan Gibbons [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| On 10/20/2016 05:44 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > |I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 9 Committer. > > Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of > patches, > mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ > repository. > He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by > javac, > and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, > which > have also been incorporated into JDK 9. > > See: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > > This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have now > been > included in JDK 9 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 > > > > Votes are due by the end of Nov 3, 2016. > > Only current JDK 9 Committers [1] are eligible to vote > on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying > to this mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > -- Jonathan Gibbons > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| > From vicente.romero at oracle.com Thu Jul 13 01:19:07 2017 From: vicente.romero at oracle.com (Vicente Romero) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Andrey Nazarov In-Reply-To: <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> References: <580964F4.6040106@oracle.com> <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> Message-ID: vote: yes Vicente On 07/12/2017 08:30 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > In a vote last year, Andrey was voted to be a JDK 9 Committer. > However, the vote > did not occur in time for him to be grandfathered into the JDK 10 > project when that > was created. > > So ... > > I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 10 Committer. > > Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of > patches, > mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ > repository. > He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by > javac, > and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, > which > have also been incorporated into JDK 9 and hence into JDK 10. > > See: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > > This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have now > been > included in JDK 9 and hence JDK 10. > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 > > > Votes are due by the end of July 26, 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote > on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying > to this mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > -- Jonathan Gibbons > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| > > > > On 10/20/2016 05:44 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: >> |I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 9 Committer. >> >> Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of >> patches, >> mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ >> repository. >> He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by >> javac, >> and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, >> which >> have also been incorporated into JDK 9. >> >> See: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >> >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >> >> This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have >> now been >> included in JDK 9 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 >> >> >> >> Votes are due by the end of Nov 3, 2016. >> >> Only current JDK 9 Committers [1] are eligible to vote >> on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying >> to this mailing list. >> >> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. >> >> -- Jonathan Gibbons >> >> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census >> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| >> > From daniel.fuchs at oracle.com Thu Jul 13 08:49:44 2017 From: daniel.fuchs at oracle.com (Daniel Fuchs) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 10:49:44 +0200 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Andrey Nazarov In-Reply-To: <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> References: <580964F4.6040106@oracle.com> <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> Message-ID: Vote: yes On 7/13/17 2:30 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > In a vote last year, Andrey was voted to be a JDK 9 Committer. However, > the vote > did not occur in time for him to be grandfathered into the JDK 10 > project when that > was created. > > So ... > > I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 10 Committer. From jan.lahoda at oracle.com Thu Jul 13 08:55:12 2017 From: jan.lahoda at oracle.com (Jan Lahoda) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 10:55:12 +0200 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Andrey Nazarov In-Reply-To: <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> References: <580964F4.6040106@oracle.com> <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> Message-ID: <59673570.2020803@oracle.com> Vote: yes On 13.7.2017 02:30, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > In a vote last year, Andrey was voted to be a JDK 9 Committer. However, > the vote > did not occur in time for him to be grandfathered into the JDK 10 > project when that > was created. > > So ... > > I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 10 Committer. > > Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of patches, > mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ repository. > He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by javac, > and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, which > have also been incorporated into JDK 9 and hence into JDK 10. > > See: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > > This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have now been > included in JDK 9 and hence JDK 10. > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 > > > Votes are due by the end of July 26, 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote > on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying > to this mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > -- Jonathan Gibbons > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| > > > > On 10/20/2016 05:44 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: >> |I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 9 Committer. >> >> Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of >> patches, >> mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ >> repository. >> He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by >> javac, >> and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, >> which >> have also been incorporated into JDK 9. >> >> See: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >> >> This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have now >> been >> included in JDK 9 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 >> >> >> >> Votes are due by the end of Nov 3, 2016. >> >> Only current JDK 9 Committers [1] are eligible to vote >> on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying >> to this mailing list. >> >> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. >> >> -- Jonathan Gibbons >> >> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census >> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| >> > From amy.lu at oracle.com Thu Jul 13 09:17:41 2017 From: amy.lu at oracle.com (Amy Lu) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:17:41 +0800 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Andrey Nazarov In-Reply-To: <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> References: <580964F4.6040106@oracle.com> <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> Message-ID: <3c2a8ccf-9f23-230e-c76a-a04430a9e45d@oracle.com> Vote: Yes /Amy On 7/13/17 8:30 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 10 Committer. From volker.simonis at gmail.com Thu Jul 13 09:47:10 2017 From: volker.simonis at gmail.com (Volker Simonis) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 11:47:10 +0200 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Andrey Nazarov In-Reply-To: <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> References: <580964F4.6040106@oracle.com> <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> Message-ID: Vote: yes On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > In a vote last year, Andrey was voted to be a JDK 9 Committer. However, the > vote > did not occur in time for him to be grandfathered into the JDK 10 project > when that > was created. > > So ... > > I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 10 Committer. > > Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of patches, > mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ repository. > He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by javac, > and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, which > have also been incorporated into JDK 9 and hence into JDK 10. > > See: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > > This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have now been > included in JDK 9 and hence JDK 10. > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 > > Votes are due by the end of July 26, 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote > on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying > to this mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > -- Jonathan Gibbons > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| > > > > On 10/20/2016 05:44 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: >> >> |I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 9 Committer. >> >> Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of >> patches, >> mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ repository. >> He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by javac, >> and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, >> which >> have also been incorporated into JDK 9. >> >> See: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >> >> This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have now >> been >> included in JDK 9 >> >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 >> >> >> Votes are due by the end of Nov 3, 2016. >> >> Only current JDK 9 Committers [1] are eligible to vote >> on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying >> to this mailing list. >> >> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. >> >> -- Jonathan Gibbons >> >> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census >> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| >> > From christoph.langer at sap.com Thu Jul 13 10:49:52 2017 From: christoph.langer at sap.com (Langer, Christoph) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 10:49:52 +0000 Subject: New JDK 10 Committer: Andrey Nazarov In-Reply-To: <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> References: <580964F4.6040106@oracle.com> <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> Message-ID: Vote:yes > -----Original Message----- > From: jdk10-dev [mailto:jdk10-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf > Of Jonathan Gibbons > Sent: Donnerstag, 13. Juli 2017 02:31 > To: jdk10-dev at openjdk.java.net > Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Andrey Nazarov > > In a vote last year, Andrey was voted to be a JDK 9 Committer. However, > the vote > did not occur in time for him to be grandfathered into the JDK 10 > project when that > was created. > > So ... > > I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 10 Committer. > > Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of > patches, > mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ repository. > He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by javac, > and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, which > have also been incorporated into JDK 9 and hence into JDK 10. > > See: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazaro > v%29 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > > This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have now been > included in JDK 9 and hence JDK 10. > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov > %29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 > > > Votes are due by the end of July 26, 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote > on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying > to this mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > -- Jonathan Gibbons > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| > > > > On 10/20/2016 05:44 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > > |I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 9 Committer. > > > > Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of > > patches, > > mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ > > repository. > > He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by > > javac, > > and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, > > which > > have also been incorporated into JDK 9. > > > > See: > > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov% > 29 > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > > > > This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have now > > been > > included in JDK 9 > > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov > %29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 > > > > > > > > Votes are due by the end of Nov 3, 2016. > > > > Only current JDK 9 Committers [1] are eligible to vote > > on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying > > to this mailing list. > > > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > > > -- Jonathan Gibbons > > > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| > > From vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com Thu Jul 13 11:23:43 2017 From: vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com (Vladimir Ivanov) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:23:43 +0300 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Andrey Nazarov In-Reply-To: <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> References: <580964F4.6040106@oracle.com> <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> Message-ID: <03ffc0ca-941a-d481-494f-d2cf8c7c6e55@oracle.com> Vote: yes Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov On 7/13/17 3:30 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 10 Committer. From james.laskey at oracle.com Thu Jul 13 11:23:51 2017 From: james.laskey at oracle.com (Jim Laskey (Oracle)) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 08:23:51 -0300 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Andrey Nazarov In-Reply-To: <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> References: <580964F4.6040106@oracle.com> <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> Message-ID: vote: yes > On Jul 12, 2017, at 9:30 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > > In a vote last year, Andrey was voted to be a JDK 9 Committer. However, the vote > did not occur in time for him to be grandfathered into the JDK 10 project when that > was created. > > So ... > > I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 10 Committer. > > Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of patches, > mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ repository. > He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by javac, > and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, which > have also been incorporated into JDK 9 and hence into JDK 10. > > See: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > > This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have now been > included in JDK 9 and hence JDK 10. > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 > > Votes are due by the end of July 26, 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote > on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying > to this mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > -- Jonathan Gibbons > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| > > > > On 10/20/2016 05:44 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: >> |I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 9 Committer. >> >> Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of patches, >> mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ repository. >> He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by javac, >> and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, which >> have also been incorporated into JDK 9. >> >> See: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >> >> This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have now been >> included in JDK 9 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 >> >> >> Votes are due by the end of Nov 3, 2016. >> >> Only current JDK 9 Committers [1] are eligible to vote >> on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying >> to this mailing list. >> >> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. >> >> -- Jonathan Gibbons >> >> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census >> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| >> > From mikhailo.seledtsov at oracle.com Thu Jul 13 17:24:03 2017 From: mikhailo.seledtsov at oracle.com (mikhailo) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 10:24:03 -0700 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Andrey Nazarov In-Reply-To: <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> References: <580964F4.6040106@oracle.com> <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> Message-ID: <77502fda-50ec-d86d-4190-61ce29c64f39@oracle.com> Vote: yes On 07/12/2017 05:30 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > In a vote last year, Andrey was voted to be a JDK 9 Committer. > However, the vote > did not occur in time for him to be grandfathered into the JDK 10 > project when that > was created. > > So ... > > I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 10 Committer. > > Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of > patches, > mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ > repository. > He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by > javac, > and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, > which > have also been incorporated into JDK 9 and hence into JDK 10. > > See: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > > This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have now > been > included in JDK 9 and hence JDK 10. > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 > > > Votes are due by the end of July 26, 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote > on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying > to this mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > -- Jonathan Gibbons > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| > > > > On 10/20/2016 05:44 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: >> |I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 9 Committer. >> >> Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of >> patches, >> mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ >> repository. >> He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by >> javac, >> and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, >> which >> have also been incorporated into JDK 9. >> >> See: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >> >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >> >> This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have >> now been >> included in JDK 9 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 >> >> >> >> Votes are due by the end of Nov 3, 2016. >> >> Only current JDK 9 Committers [1] are eligible to vote >> on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying >> to this mailing list. >> >> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. >> >> -- Jonathan Gibbons >> >> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census >> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| >> > From chris.hegarty at oracle.com Thu Jul 13 18:01:28 2017 From: chris.hegarty at oracle.com (Chris Hegarty) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 19:01:28 +0100 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Andrey Nazarov In-Reply-To: <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> References: <580964F4.6040106@oracle.com> <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> Message-ID: <787C5006-203C-458B-9228-096643EA0F95@oracle.com> > On 13 Jul 2017, at 01:30, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > > In a vote last year, Andrey was voted to be a JDK 9 Committer. However, the vote > did not occur in time for him to be grandfathered into the JDK 10 project when that > was created. > > So ... > > I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 10 Committer. Vote: YES. -Chris. From kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com Thu Jul 13 18:04:37 2017 From: kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com (Kumar Srinivasan) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 11:04:37 -0700 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Andrey Nazarov In-Reply-To: <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> References: <580964F4.6040106@oracle.com> <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5967B635.7050803@oracle.com> Yes On 7/12/2017 5:30 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > In a vote last year, Andrey was voted to be a JDK 9 Committer. > However, the vote > did not occur in time for him to be grandfathered into the JDK 10 > project when that > was created. > > So ... > > I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 10 Committer. > > Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of > patches, > mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ > repository. > He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by > javac, > and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, > which > have also been incorporated into JDK 9 and hence into JDK 10. > > See: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > > This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have now > been > included in JDK 9 and hence JDK 10. > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 > > > Votes are due by the end of July 26, 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote > on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying > to this mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > -- Jonathan Gibbons > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| > > > > On 10/20/2016 05:44 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: >> |I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 9 Committer. >> >> Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of >> patches, >> mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ >> repository. >> He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by >> javac, >> and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, >> which >> have also been incorporated into JDK 9. >> >> See: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >> >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >> >> This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have >> now been >> included in JDK 9 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 >> >> >> >> Votes are due by the end of Nov 3, 2016. >> >> Only current JDK 9 Committers [1] are eligible to vote >> on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying >> to this mailing list. >> >> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. >> >> -- Jonathan Gibbons >> >> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census >> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| >> > From kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com Thu Jul 13 18:05:09 2017 From: kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com (Kumar Srinivasan) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 11:05:09 -0700 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Andrey Nazarov In-Reply-To: <5967B635.7050803@oracle.com> References: <580964F4.6040106@oracle.com> <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> <5967B635.7050803@oracle.com> Message-ID: <5967B655.1090102@oracle.com> Vote: yes On 7/13/2017 11:04 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: > Yes > > On 7/12/2017 5:30 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: >> In a vote last year, Andrey was voted to be a JDK 9 Committer. >> However, the vote >> did not occur in time for him to be grandfathered into the JDK 10 >> project when that >> was created. >> >> So ... >> >> I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 10 Committer. >> >> Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of >> patches, >> mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ >> repository. >> He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by >> javac, >> and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, >> which >> have also been incorporated into JDK 9 and hence into JDK 10. >> >> See: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >> >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >> >> This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have >> now been >> included in JDK 9 and hence JDK 10. >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 >> >> >> Votes are due by the end of July 26, 2017. >> >> Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote >> on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying >> to this mailing list. >> >> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. >> >> -- Jonathan Gibbons >> >> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census >> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| >> >> >> >> On 10/20/2016 05:44 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: >>> |I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 9 Committer. >>> >>> Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of >>> patches, >>> mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ >>> repository. >>> He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by >>> javac, >>> and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project >>> Jigsaw, which >>> have also been incorporated into JDK 9. >>> >>> See: >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >>> >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >>> >>> This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have >>> now been >>> included in JDK 9 >>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 >>> >>> >>> >>> Votes are due by the end of Nov 3, 2016. >>> >>> Only current JDK 9 Committers [1] are eligible to vote >>> on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying >>> to this mailing list. >>> >>> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. >>> >>> -- Jonathan Gibbons >>> >>> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census >>> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| >>> >> > From artem.smotrakov at oracle.com Thu Jul 13 20:45:02 2017 From: artem.smotrakov at oracle.com (Artem Smotrakov) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 13:45:02 -0700 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Andrey Nazarov In-Reply-To: <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> References: <580964F4.6040106@oracle.com> <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> Message-ID: <1e791aa8-1f4e-22b5-3a51-4328857d2a0f@oracle.com> Vote: yes Artem On 07/12/2017 05:30 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > In a vote last year, Andrey was voted to be a JDK 9 Committer. > However, the vote > did not occur in time for him to be grandfathered into the JDK 10 > project when that > was created. > > So ... > > I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 10 Committer. > > Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of > patches, > mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ > repository. > He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by > javac, > and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, > which > have also been incorporated into JDK 9 and hence into JDK 10. > > See: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > > This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have now > been > included in JDK 9 and hence JDK 10. > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 > > > Votes are due by the end of July 26, 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote > on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying > to this mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > -- Jonathan Gibbons > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| > > > > On 10/20/2016 05:44 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: >> |I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 9 Committer. >> >> Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of >> patches, >> mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ >> repository. >> He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by >> javac, >> and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, >> which >> have also been incorporated into JDK 9. >> >> See: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >> >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >> >> This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have >> now been >> included in JDK 9 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 >> >> >> >> Votes are due by the end of Nov 3, 2016. >> >> Only current JDK 9 Committers [1] are eligible to vote >> on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying >> to this mailing list. >> >> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. >> >> -- Jonathan Gibbons >> >> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census >> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| >> > From aleksej.efimov at oracle.com Thu Jul 13 22:24:29 2017 From: aleksej.efimov at oracle.com (Aleks Efimov) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 23:24:29 +0100 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Andrey Nazarov In-Reply-To: <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> References: <580964F4.6040106@oracle.com> <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> Message-ID: <9e6cb09b-a6ad-a7aa-5c37-5cd45cc82983@oracle.com> Vote: yes On 07/13/2017 01:30 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > In a vote last year, Andrey was voted to be a JDK 9 Committer. > However, the vote > did not occur in time for him to be grandfathered into the JDK 10 > project when that > was created. > > So ... > > I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 10 Committer. > > Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of > patches, > mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ > repository. > He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by > javac, > and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, > which > have also been incorporated into JDK 9 and hence into JDK 10. > > See: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > > This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have now > been > included in JDK 9 and hence JDK 10. > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 > > > Votes are due by the end of July 26, 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote > on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying > to this mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > -- Jonathan Gibbons > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| > > > > On 10/20/2016 05:44 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: >> |I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 9 Committer. >> >> Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of >> patches, >> mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ >> repository. >> He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by >> javac, >> and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, >> which >> have also been incorporated into JDK 9. >> >> See: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >> >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >> >> This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have >> now been >> included in JDK 9 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 >> >> >> >> Votes are due by the end of Nov 3, 2016. >> >> Only current JDK 9 Committers [1] are eligible to vote >> on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying >> to this mailing list. >> >> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. >> >> -- Jonathan Gibbons >> >> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census >> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| >> > From sean.mullan at oracle.com Thu Jul 27 15:44:11 2017 From: sean.mullan at oracle.com (Sean Mullan) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:44:11 -0400 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Adam Petcher Message-ID: I hereby nominate Adam Petcher to JDK 10 Committer. Adam Petcher is a member of the Security Libraries Team at Oracle. He has contributed 12 changesets [3] in the security libraries area. Several of these involved complex changes to cryptographic implementations in the JDK, in both Java and native code. Votes are due by 16:00 GMT, August 10 2017. Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list. For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. Sean Mullan [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote [3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/search/?rev=%28keyword%28%22adam.petcher%40oracle.com%22%29%20or%20author%28apetcher%29%29&revcount=20 From chris.hegarty at oracle.com Thu Jul 27 15:45:13 2017 From: chris.hegarty at oracle.com (Chris Hegarty) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:45:13 +0100 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Adam Petcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <03AF83AB-8C6E-4CA1-8716-B59B0A789817@oracle.com> > On 27 Jul 2017, at 16:44, Sean Mullan wrote: > > I hereby nominate Adam Petcher to JDK 10 Committer. Vote: YES -Chris. From sean.mullan at oracle.com Thu Jul 27 15:45:41 2017 From: sean.mullan at oracle.com (Sean Mullan) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:45:41 -0400 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Adam Petcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Vote: yes --Sean On 7/27/17 11:44 AM, Sean Mullan wrote: > I hereby nominate Adam Petcher to JDK 10 Committer. > > Adam Petcher is a member of the Security Libraries Team at Oracle. He > has contributed 12 changesets [3] in the security libraries area. > Several of these involved complex changes to cryptographic > implementations in the JDK, in both Java and native code. > > Votes are due by 16:00 GMT, August 10 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this > nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing > list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Sean Mullan > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote > [3] > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/search/?rev=%28keyword%28%22adam.petcher%40oracle.com%22%29%20or%20author%28apetcher%29%29&revcount=20 > From xuelei.fan at oracle.com Thu Jul 27 15:46:50 2017 From: xuelei.fan at oracle.com (Xuelei Fan) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:46:50 -0700 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Adam Petcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <13da36bb-1cea-0477-d99f-3957f7b0c802@oracle.com> Vote: Yes Xuelei On 7/27/2017 8:44 AM, Sean Mullan wrote: > I hereby nominate Adam Petcher to JDK 10 Committer. > > Adam Petcher is a member of the Security Libraries Team at Oracle. He > has contributed 12 changesets [3] in the security libraries area. > Several of these involved complex changes to cryptographic > implementations in the JDK, in both Java and native code. > > Votes are due by 16:00 GMT, August 10 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this > nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing > list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Sean Mullan > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote > [3] > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/search/?rev=%28keyword%28%22adam.petcher%40oracle.com%22%29%20or%20author%28apetcher%29%29&revcount=20 > From Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com Thu Jul 27 15:47:13 2017 From: Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com (Roger Riggs) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:47:13 -0400 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Adam Petcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5f6634b9-c00b-32d9-7e58-97ffea0374dd@Oracle.com> Vote: Yes On 7/27/2017 11:44 AM, Sean Mullan wrote: > I hereby nominate Adam Petcher to JDK 10 Committer. > From sean.coffey at oracle.com Thu Jul 27 15:47:57 2017 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Se=c3=a1n_Coffey?=) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:47:57 +0100 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Adam Petcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Vote: YES regards, Sean. On 27/07/2017 16:44, Sean Mullan wrote: > I hereby nominate Adam Petcher to JDK 10 Committer. > > Adam Petcher is a member of the Security Libraries Team at Oracle. He > has contributed 12 changesets [3] in the security libraries area. > Several of these involved complex changes to cryptographic > implementations in the JDK, in both Java and native code. > > Votes are due by 16:00 GMT, August 10 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this > nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this > mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Sean Mullan > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote > [3] > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/search/?rev=%28keyword%28%22adam.petcher%40oracle.com%22%29%20or%20author%28apetcher%29%29&revcount=20 From volker.simonis at gmail.com Thu Jul 27 16:13:46 2017 From: volker.simonis at gmail.com (Volker Simonis) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 18:13:46 +0200 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Adam Petcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Vote: yes On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Sean Mullan wrote: > I hereby nominate Adam Petcher to JDK 10 Committer. > > Adam Petcher is a member of the Security Libraries Team at Oracle. He has > contributed 12 changesets [3] in the security libraries area. Several of > these involved complex changes to cryptographic implementations in the JDK, > in both Java and native code. > > Votes are due by 16:00 GMT, August 10 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this nomination. > Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Sean Mullan > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote > [3] > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/search/?rev=%28keyword%28%22adam.petcher%40oracle.com%22%29%20or%20author%28apetcher%29%29&revcount=20 From aleksej.efimov at oracle.com Thu Jul 27 17:00:34 2017 From: aleksej.efimov at oracle.com (Aleks Efimov) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 18:00:34 +0100 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Adam Petcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <119030a7-abfb-892d-c5a0-3eef0d35dea6@oracle.com> Vote: yes On 07/27/2017 04:44 PM, Sean Mullan wrote: > I hereby nominate Adam Petcher to JDK 10 Committer. > > Adam Petcher is a member of the Security Libraries Team at Oracle. He > has contributed 12 changesets [3] in the security libraries area. > Several of these involved complex changes to cryptographic > implementations in the JDK, in both Java and native code. > > Votes are due by 16:00 GMT, August 10 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this > nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this > mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Sean Mullan > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote > [3] > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/search/?rev=%28keyword%28%22adam.petcher%40oracle.com%22%29%20or%20author%28apetcher%29%29&revcount=20 From harold.seigel at oracle.com Thu Jul 27 17:27:43 2017 From: harold.seigel at oracle.com (harold seigel) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:27:43 -0400 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Adam Petcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0f5e855a-91b9-0453-862c-763986b25947@oracle.com> Vote: yes Harold On 7/27/2017 11:44 AM, Sean Mullan wrote: > I hereby nominate Adam Petcher to JDK 10 Committer. > > Adam Petcher is a member of the Security Libraries Team at Oracle. He > has contributed 12 changesets [3] in the security libraries area. > Several of these involved complex changes to cryptographic > implementations in the JDK, in both Java and native code. > > Votes are due by 16:00 GMT, August 10 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this > nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this > mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Sean Mullan > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote > [3] > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/search/?rev=%28keyword%28%22adam.petcher%40oracle.com%22%29%20or%20author%28apetcher%29%29&revcount=20 From eric.caspole at oracle.com Thu Jul 27 17:42:11 2017 From: eric.caspole at oracle.com (Eric Caspole) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:42:11 -0400 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Adam Petcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <705a4a79-7eda-0808-4e22-c7b60865bf06@oracle.com> Vote: yes Eric On 07/27/2017 11:44 AM, Sean Mullan wrote: > I hereby nominate Adam Petcher to JDK 10 Committer. > > Adam Petcher is a member of the Security Libraries Team at Oracle. He > has contributed 12 changesets [3] in the security libraries area. > Several of these involved complex changes to cryptographic > implementations in the JDK, in both Java and native code. > > Votes are due by 16:00 GMT, August 10 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this > nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing > list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Sean Mullan > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote > [3] > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/search/?rev=%28keyword%28%22adam.petcher%40oracle.com%22%29%20or%20author%28apetcher%29%29&revcount=20 > From serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com Thu Jul 27 19:28:40 2017 From: serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com (serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 12:28:40 -0700 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Andrey Nazarov In-Reply-To: <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> References: <580964F4.6040106@oracle.com> <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> Message-ID: Vote: yes From anthony.scarpino at oracle.com Thu Jul 27 19:41:55 2017 From: anthony.scarpino at oracle.com (Anthony Scarpino) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 12:41:55 -0700 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Adam Petcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <65b60922-79bd-eb2b-c27c-23532048fec9@oracle.com> On 07/27/2017 08:44 AM, Sean Mullan wrote: > I hereby nominate Adam Petcher to JDK 10 Committer. > > Adam Petcher is a member of the Security Libraries Team at Oracle. He > has contributed 12 changesets [3] in the security libraries area. > Several of these involved complex changes to cryptographic > implementations in the JDK, in both Java and native code. > > Votes are due by 16:00 GMT, August 10 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this > nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing > list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Sean Mullan > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote > [3] > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/search/?rev=%28keyword%28%22adam.petcher%40oracle.com%22%29%20or%20author%28apetcher%29%29&revcount=20 > Vote: yes Tony From artem.smotrakov at oracle.com Fri Jul 28 00:51:06 2017 From: artem.smotrakov at oracle.com (Artem Smotrakov) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:51:06 -0700 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Adam Petcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9814a507-01ca-1467-3d4f-e287aabaa959@oracle.com> Vote: yes Artem On 07/27/2017 08:44 AM, Sean Mullan wrote: > I hereby nominate Adam Petcher to JDK 10 Committer. > > Adam Petcher is a member of the Security Libraries Team at Oracle. He > has contributed 12 changesets [3] in the security libraries area. > Several of these involved complex changes to cryptographic > implementations in the JDK, in both Java and native code. > > Votes are due by 16:00 GMT, August 10 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this > nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this > mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Sean Mullan > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote > [3] > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/search/?rev=%28keyword%28%22adam.petcher%40oracle.com%22%29%20or%20author%28apetcher%29%29&revcount=20 From bradford.wetmore at oracle.com Fri Jul 28 05:58:18 2017 From: bradford.wetmore at oracle.com (Bradford Wetmore) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 22:58:18 -0700 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Adam Petcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6053ac9e-9cd8-563c-74ef-81621c45c484@oracle.com> Vote: YES Brad On 7/27/2017 8:44 AM, Sean Mullan wrote: > I hereby nominate Adam Petcher to JDK 10 Committer. > > Adam Petcher is a member of the Security Libraries Team at Oracle. He > has contributed 12 changesets [3] in the security libraries area. > Several of these involved complex changes to cryptographic > implementations in the JDK, in both Java and native code. > > Votes are due by 16:00 GMT, August 10 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this > nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing > list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Sean Mullan > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote > [3] > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/search/?rev=%28keyword%28%22adam.petcher%40oracle.com%22%29%20or%20author%28apetcher%29%29&revcount=20 > From sibabrata.sahoo at oracle.com Fri Jul 28 06:27:53 2017 From: sibabrata.sahoo at oracle.com (Sibabrata Sahoo) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 23:27:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Adam Petcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Vote: YES -- Siba -----Original Message----- From: Sean Mullan Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 9:14 PM To: jdk10-dev at openjdk.java.net Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Adam Petcher I hereby nominate Adam Petcher to JDK 10 Committer. Adam Petcher is a member of the Security Libraries Team at Oracle. He has contributed 12 changesets [3] in the security libraries area. Several of these involved complex changes to cryptographic implementations in the JDK, in both Java and native code. Votes are due by 16:00 GMT, August 10 2017. Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list. For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. Sean Mullan [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote [3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/search/?rev=%28keyword%28%22adam.petcher%40oracle.com%22%29%20or%20author%28apetcher%29%29&revcount=20 From vincent.x.ryan at oracle.com Mon Jul 31 15:08:59 2017 From: vincent.x.ryan at oracle.com (Vincent Ryan) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:08:59 +0100 Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Adam Petcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6879D954-4D50-40A5-BED8-B9241A5FAC90@oracle.com> Vote: yes > On 27 Jul 2017, at 16:44, Sean Mullan wrote: > > I hereby nominate Adam Petcher to JDK 10 Committer. > > Adam Petcher is a member of the Security Libraries Team at Oracle. He has contributed 12 changesets [3] in the security libraries area. Several of these involved complex changes to cryptographic implementations in the JDK, in both Java and native code. > > Votes are due by 16:00 GMT, August 10 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying to this mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > Sean Mullan > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote > [3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/search/?rev=%28keyword%28%22adam.petcher%40oracle.com%22%29%20or%20author%28apetcher%29%29&revcount=20 From jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com Mon Jul 31 18:04:22 2017 From: jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com (Jonathan Gibbons) Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:04:22 -0700 Subject: Result: New JDK 10 Committer: Andrey Nazarov In-Reply-To: <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> References: <580964F4.6040106@oracle.com> <5966BF38.1030504@oracle.com> Message-ID: <597F7126.50204@oracle.com> | Voting for*Andrey Nazarov* [1] is now closed. Yes:*12* Veto: 0|| Abstain:*0*|| Invalid:*1 (too late)*| |** According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is sufficient to approve the nomination. *Jonathan Gibbons* [1]*http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk10-dev/2017-July/000393.html*| On 07/12/2017 05:30 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > In a vote last year, Andrey was voted to be a JDK 9 Committer. > However, the vote > did not occur in time for him to be grandfathered into the JDK 10 > project when that > was created. > > So ... > > I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 10 Committer. > > Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of > patches, > mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ > repository. > He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by > javac, > and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, > which > have also been incorporated into JDK 9 and hence into JDK 10. > > See: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 > > This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have now > been > included in JDK 9 and hence JDK 10. > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 > > > Votes are due by the end of July 26, 2017. > > Only current JDK 10 Committers [1] are eligible to vote > on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying > to this mailing list. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. > > -- Jonathan Gibbons > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| > > > > On 10/20/2016 05:44 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: >> |I hereby nominate Andrey Nazarov to JDK 9 Committer. >> >> Andrey is a member of the SQE team and has contributed a number of >> patches, >> mostly to the langtools/ repository, but also some to the jdk/ >> repository. >> He has contributed tests for the class file attributes generated by >> javac, >> and most recently, he has been contributing tests for Project Jigsaw, >> which >> have also been incorporated into JDK 9. >> >> See: >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >> >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29 >> >> This query covers contributions to jigsaw/jake/langtools that have >> now been >> included in JDK 9 >> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jigsaw/jake/langtools/log?rev=user%28anazarov%29+and+date%28%222015-8-1+to++2016-1-1%22%29 >> >> >> >> Votes are due by the end of Nov 3, 2016. >> >> Only current JDK 9 Committers [1] are eligible to vote >> on this nomination. Votes must be cast in the open by replying >> to this mailing list. >> >> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2]. >> >> -- Jonathan Gibbons >> >> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census >> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#committer-vote| >> >