jdk10/hs -> jdk10/jdk10 integrations?

[Joseph D. Darcy]

Hi Aleksey,

On 7/6/2017 10:08 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On 07/06/2017 06:56 PM, joe darcy wrote:
>> On 7/6/2017 9:23 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>>> I am trying to understand the relationship between jdk10/hs and jdk10/jdk10.
>>> Naively, I would assume it has the same relationship as jdk9/dev and jdk9/jdk9:
>>> e.g. the development is going on in /dev or /hs, and then jdkX/jdkX serves as
>>> integration+release repository, and then regular integrations are happening to
>>> jdkX/jdkX.
>> The relationship that is naive to assume is the correct one, but isn't fully
>> implemented yet since, as you've noticed, there haven't been any hs -> master
>> integrations in JDK 10 yet. (We're working on some new internal infrastructure
>> to support integrations and it isn't fully in place.)
>>
>> Having integrations occurring is a precondition for the planned repo
>> consolidation, which is targeted for September:
>>
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk10-dev/2017-June/000371.html
> So, that means jdk10/hs -> jdk10/jdk10 integration would start happening
> *before* repo consolidation, right?

Correct; both hs and client will need to integration to jdk10/jdk10 
before the consolidation.

>
> We can use jdk10/hs as the basis for Shenandoah, because we will have to
> integrate through that anyway. Too bad jdk10/sandbox does not have jdk10/hs
> changes too, it seems:
>    http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/hs/hotspot/rev/ae91ec8b554a
>    http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/sandbox/hotspot/log?rev=ae91ec8b554a
>
> Which means whatever we are doing in sandboxes is not getting exposed to jdk10
> mainline work...
>

The sandbox is being synced with jdk10/jdk10.

Cheers,

-Joe