Re: Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Erik Österlund

[Claes Redestad]

There are no strict definition of what constitutes significant
change, leaving it open for interpretation.  There are plenty of
Committers who've been happily accepted after doing a handful
of test fixes, but seemingly not everyone is measured with the
same ruler.

No rule change needed, but a social shift is long overdue.

/Claes

On 2017-06-22 14:13, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 14:04 +0200, Claes Redestad wrote:
>>   
>> On 2017-06-22 11:26, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
>>>   
>>> Vote: veto
>>>   
>> Thanks for sending a clear message that there's no place for
>> pragmatism in our organization! /s
>    these are OpenJDK rules, not company rules afaik.
>
> Let's change the rules then.
>
> Thanks,
>    Thomas
>