Re: Subject: CFV: New JDK 10 Committer: Erik Österlund

[Alan Bateman]

On 22/06/2017 17:36, Mario Torre wrote:
> Vote: Yes
>
> To put that on the record, I agree with Roman and Andrew Haley and the
> Veto was a surprise, I can understand a No vote, but Veto is rather
> strong,
I don't think "No" is an option as it's Lazy Consensus with possible 
votes being Yes, Veto, or Abstain. The vetos need to be withdraw or 
re-casted to Yes or Abstain for this vote to carry.

Some of the comments have pointed out that Erik has more significant 
changes in the works and maybe it would be better to re-nominate in a 
few weeks once they are in jdk10/jdk10. More significant changes means a 
larger track record to point to and makes it much easier to vote.

-Alan.