<Swing Dev> hg: jdk7/swing/jdk: 6624717: Corrupted combo box, GTK L&F, Ubuntu 7.10

[Joseph D. Darcy]

David Herron wrote:
> It depends on what Kirill meant by "jdk6".
>
> OpenJDK6 != JDK6 .. in that the OpenJDK6 tree is not related to the 
> tree which produces the 6 update releases.  Therefore fixes in JDK6 do 
> not automatically roll into OpenJDK6.  The situation is different in 
> OpenJDK7/JDK7 where they are nearly the same source trees.  There are 
> hysterical historical reasons to this unfortunate situation.

> The bug as it stands is not targeted to OpenJDK 6.  Unless I'm missing 
> something it's also not targeted to JDK6.

Looking at the bug, there is a lot of interest in having this fixed in 
evidence on bugs.sun.com and the fix seems limited to localized changes 
in one file.  I've created a sub for this issue for OpenJDK 6; Kirill, 
please put the fix back there too.

-Joe

> - David Herron
>
>
>
> Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
>> Yes, Kirill replied privately saying that the fix will be committed 
>> to the jdk6 tree.  I guess that means we can expect it in the next 
>> OpenJDK 6 tarball?
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> David Herron wrote:
>>> I saw the following question from Tom Fitzsimmons and that it did 
>>> not CC the jdk6-dev alias.
>>>
>>> Tom, I take it you're requesting this fix for jdk6-dev?
>>>
>>> - David Herron
>>>
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Re: <Swing Dev> hg: jdk7/swing/jdk: 6624717: Corrupted combo box, 
>>> GTK L&F, Ubuntu 7.10
>>> From:
>>> Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim at redhat.com>
>>> Date:
>>> Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:39:15 -0400
>>>
>>> To:
>>> kirill.kirichenko at sun.com
>>> CC:
>>> jdk7-changes at openjdk.java.net, swing-dev at openjdk.java.net
>>>
>>>
>>> kirill.kirichenko at sun.com wrote:
>>>> Changeset: eecc88fb2430
>>>> Author:    stayer
>>>> Date:      2008-04-11 16:25 +0400
>>>> URL:       http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/swing/jdk/rev/eecc88fb2430
>>>>
>>>> 6624717: Corrupted combo box, GTK L&F, Ubuntu 7.10
>>>> Reviewed-by: peterz
>>>>
>>>> ! src/solaris/native/sun/awt/gtk2_interface.c
>>>>
>>>
>>> Will this be committed to the jdk6 tree as well?
>>>
>>> Tom
>>
>