OpenJDK 6 build 16 source bundle posted

[Lillian Angel]

Hi,

Joe Darcy wrote:
> Hello.
>
> There was a misunderstanding with RE; the posted b16 sources were 
> based on an internal staging repository being used to hold the 
> security fixes before they were made public.  Fixes pushed to the 
> public repo after that point were not included.  I've asked RE to redo 
> a version of b16 to reflect the current state of the OpenJDK 6 
> repositories, including the little cms changes.  The new source 
> bundled and corresponding tags in the repository should be available 
> within a few days.

Any update on this? Is there a new source bundle?


Thanks
Lillian


>
> Sorry for the confusion,
>
> -Joe
>
> On 04/22/09 09:37 AM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
>> I'll check with our RE folks to see what is going on...
>>
>> -Joe
>>
>> Phil Race wrote:
>>> All I know is that I pushed the change 4 whole weeks ago.
>>> How the b16 source bundle was created is not something into which
>>> I have any insight.
>>>
>>> -phil.
>>>
>>> Lillian Angel wrote:
>>>> Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
>>>>> Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
>>>>>> Lillian Angel wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
>>>>>>>> Without further adieu, the source bundle for OpenJDK 6 b16 is 
>>>>>>>> available from
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk6/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and the OpenJDK 6 Mercurial repositories 
>>>>>>>> (http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6) will be tagged with the 
>>>>>>>> build information accordingly.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The previous source bundle was for b14.  There was no distinct 
>>>>>>>> b15 per se; b15 was used to mark the transition from teamware 
>>>>>>>> to Mercurial.  The b16 build is the first to be done purely in 
>>>>>>>> Mercurial.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There were 45 bug fixes in this build ranging from security 
>>>>>>>> fixes to sound updates; OpenJDK 6 b16 has all relevant security 
>>>>>>>> fixes from the recent JDK synchronized security release.  A few 
>>>>>>>> fixes of note, during a build importing binary plugs now 
>>>>>>>> defaults to false (6781572 "Default to 
>>>>>>>> IMPORT_BINARY_PLUGS=false for OpenJDK 6 builds") and several 
>>>>>>>> fixes were applied that should render a few IcedTea patches 
>>>>>>>> unnecessary:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   6736248 EnumEditor bug. Class check incorrect
>>>>>>>>   6733718 test 
>>>>>>>> /java/awt/FullScreen/UninitializedDisplayModeChangeTest/ fails
>>>>>>>>   6593946 (bf) X-Buffer.compact() does not discard mark as 
>>>>>>>> specified
>>>>>>>>   6778493 Fix (langtools) ant build to honor fcs MILESTONE setting
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The other non security bugs fixed in this build are:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 6761791: Crash in the FontManager code due to use of JNIEnv 
>>>>>>>> saved by another thread
>>>>>>>> 6512707: "incompatible types" after (unrelated) annotation 
>>>>>>>> processing
>>>>>>>> 6632696: Writing to closed output files (writeBytes) leaks 
>>>>>>>> native memory (unix)
>>>>>>>> 6788196: (porting) Bounds checks in io_util.c rely on undefined 
>>>>>>>> behaviour
>>>>>>>> 6791458: FileInputStream/RandomAccessFile.read leaks memory if 
>>>>>>>> invoked on closed stream with len > 8k
>>>>>>>> 6792066: src/share/native/java/io/io_util.c clean-ups
>>>>>>>> 6819886: System.getProperty("os.name") reports Vista on Windows 7
>>>>>>>> 6821031: Upgrade OpenJDK's LittleCMS version to 1.18
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually, the 1.18 version was not included in this release. b16 
>>>>>>> still includes 1.16. Any thoughts?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Phil?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>
>>>>> PS b16 does include this changeset, does it not?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/2bdeec6199b7
>>>>
>>>> Apparently not. This change shows that has clearly been updated to 
>>>> 1.18 (see version in comment), but it does not appear in the b16 
>>>> sources (still says 1.16):
>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/diff/2bdeec6199b7/src/share/native/sun/java2d/cmm/lcms/lcms.h 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lillian
>>
>