[FOR REVIEW] hs14 merge for OpenJDK6

[Andrew John Hughes]

2009/8/5 Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at sun.com>:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
>> Nope, still the same error :(
>
> So I needed to fix the group ownership and also add group write permissions
> on a few files.
>
> Andrew: Sorry for the delay - Please try it again?
>
> Thanks-
>
> Tim
>

Thanks Tim, that seems to have fixed the permissions issue.

There now seems to be an issue with jcheck, as the merge causes some
bugids to be repeated:

pushing to ssh://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6-gate/hotspot
searching for changes
remote: adding changesets
remote: adding manifests
remote: adding file changes
remote: added 555 changesets with 4771 changes to 1453 files
remote:
remote: > Changeset: 100:d821d920b465
remote: > Author:    kvn
remote: > Date:      2008-03-11 11:04
remote: >
remote: > 6623167: C2 crashed in StoreCMNode::Value
remote: > Summary: C2 crashed in StoreCMNode::Value because
n->in(MemNode::OopStore) is 0.
remote: > Reviewed-by: rasbold, never
remote:
remote: Bugid 6623167 already used in this repository, in revision 20
remote:
remote: > Changeset: 104:2c106685d6d0
remote: > Author:    dcubed
remote: > Date:      2008-03-12 18:06
remote: >
remote: > 6497639: 4/3 Profiling Swing application caused JVM crash
remote: > Summary: Make RedefineClasses() interoperate better with
class sharing.
remote: > Reviewed-by: sspitsyn, jmasa
remote:
remote: Bugid 6497639 already used in this repository, in revision 20
remote:
remote: > Changeset: 105:d8b3ef7ee3e5
remote: > Author:    dcubed
remote: > Date:      2008-03-12 18:07
remote: >
remote: > 6599425: 4/3 OopMapCache::lookup() can cause later crash or
assert() failure
remote: > Summary: Add should_not_be_cached() to markOop and methodOop
and query that status inOopMapCache::lookup()
remote: > Reviewed-by: coleenp, sspitsyn, jmasa
remote:
remote: Bugid 6599425 already used in this repository, in revision 20
remote:
remote: > Changeset: 240:65fe2bd88839
remote: > Author:    never
remote: > Date:      2008-06-05 21:44
remote: >
remote: > 6614100: EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION while running Eclipse
with 1.6.0_05-ea
remote: > Reviewed-by: kvn, jrose, rasbold
remote:
remote: Bugid 6614100 already used in this repository, in revision 20
remote:
remote: > Changeset: 286:3e82d72933d0
remote: > Author:    xlu
remote: > Date:      2008-06-26 14:15
remote: >
remote: > 6718830: Hotspot fails to build with gcc 4.3
remote: > Summary: Fixed linux make file and couple adlc code to meet
the changes of gcc 4.3
remote: > Reviewed-by: kamg, igor
remote:
remote: Bugid 6718830 already used in this repository, in revision 32
remote:
remote: > Changeset: 289:551f4309f476
remote: > Author:    ohair
remote: > Date:      2008-07-03 10:46
remote: >
remote: > 6695777: Queens.class should be built from source, not put
in source repo
remote: > Reviewed-by: kvn
remote:
remote: Bugid 6695777 already used in this repository, in revision 20
remote:
remote: > Changeset: 314:54499b980c23
remote: > Author:    swamyv
remote: > Date:      2008-07-29 13:54
remote: >
remote: > 6710791: Remove files or build from source:maf-1_0.jar, jlfg-1_0.jar
remote: > Summary: Removed maf-1_0.jar and jlfg-1_0.jar files.
remote: > Reviewed-by: poonam, jjh
remote:
remote: Bugid 6710791 already used in this repository, in revision 20
remote:
remote: > Changeset: 360:fa4d1d240383
remote: > Author:    never
remote: > Date:      2008-08-26 15:49
remote: >
remote: > 6741642: bad enum definition in ciTypeFlow.hpp
remote: > Reviewed-by: rasbold, martin
remote: > Contributed-by: doko at ubuntu.com
remote:
remote: Bugid 6741642 already used in this repository, in revision 22
remote:
remote: > Changeset: 589:748572b86af6
remote: > Author:    never
remote: > Date:      2009-04-07 14:46
remote: >
remote: > 6636360: compiler/6595044/Main.java test fails with 64bit
java on solaris-sparcv9 with SIGSEGV
remote: > Reviewed-by: kvn, twisti
remote:
remote: Bugid 6636360 already used in this repository, in revision 29
remote:
remote: abort: pretxnchangegroup.0.jcheck hook failed
remote: transaction abort!
remote: rollback completed
abort: unexpected response: empty string

Is there a way of getting it to ignore these for this one push?  I
don't know of a way to just pull out these nine changesets from the
555 waiting to go...
-- 
Andrew :-)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net

PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8