Bugids already used in this repository (Re: [FOR REVIEW] hs14 merge for OpenJDK6)

[Tim Bell]

Andrew John Hughes wrote:

> Thanks Tim, that seems to have fixed the permissions issue.

Good.

> There now seems to be an issue with jcheck, as the merge causes some
> bugids to be repeated:

Hmmm - how did these changesets come in through two different paths?

> pushing to ssh://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6-gate/hotspot
> searching for changes
> remote: adding changesets
> remote: adding manifests
> remote: adding file changes
> remote: added 555 changesets with 4771 changes to 1453 files
> remote:
> remote: > Changeset: 100:d821d920b465
> remote: > Author:    kvn
> remote: > Date:      2008-03-11 11:04
> remote: >
> remote: > 6623167: C2 crashed in StoreCMNode::Value
> remote: > Summary: C2 crashed in StoreCMNode::Value because
> n->in(MemNode::OopStore) is 0.
> remote: > Reviewed-by: rasbold, never
> remote:
> remote: Bugid 6623167 already used in this repository, in revision 20
> remote:
> remote: > Changeset: 104:2c106685d6d0
> remote: > Author:    dcubed
> remote: > Date:      2008-03-12 18:06
> remote: >
> remote: > 6497639: 4/3 Profiling Swing application caused JVM crash
> remote: > Summary: Make RedefineClasses() interoperate better with
> class sharing.
> remote: > Reviewed-by: sspitsyn, jmasa
> remote:
> remote: Bugid 6497639 already used in this repository, in revision 20
> remote:
> remote: > Changeset: 105:d8b3ef7ee3e5
> remote: > Author:    dcubed
> remote: > Date:      2008-03-12 18:07
> remote: >
> remote: > 6599425: 4/3 OopMapCache::lookup() can cause later crash or
> assert() failure
> remote: > Summary: Add should_not_be_cached() to markOop and methodOop
> and query that status inOopMapCache::lookup()
> remote: > Reviewed-by: coleenp, sspitsyn, jmasa
> remote:
> remote: Bugid 6599425 already used in this repository, in revision 20
> remote:
> remote: > Changeset: 240:65fe2bd88839
> remote: > Author:    never
> remote: > Date:      2008-06-05 21:44
> remote: >
> remote: > 6614100: EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION while running Eclipse
> with 1.6.0_05-ea
> remote: > Reviewed-by: kvn, jrose, rasbold
> remote:
> remote: Bugid 6614100 already used in this repository, in revision 20
> remote:
> remote: > Changeset: 286:3e82d72933d0
> remote: > Author:    xlu
> remote: > Date:      2008-06-26 14:15
> remote: >
> remote: > 6718830: Hotspot fails to build with gcc 4.3
> remote: > Summary: Fixed linux make file and couple adlc code to meet
> the changes of gcc 4.3
> remote: > Reviewed-by: kamg, igor
> remote:
> remote: Bugid 6718830 already used in this repository, in revision 32
> remote:
> remote: > Changeset: 289:551f4309f476
> remote: > Author:    ohair
> remote: > Date:      2008-07-03 10:46
> remote: >
> remote: > 6695777: Queens.class should be built from source, not put
> in source repo
> remote: > Reviewed-by: kvn
> remote:
> remote: Bugid 6695777 already used in this repository, in revision 20
> remote:
> remote: > Changeset: 314:54499b980c23
> remote: > Author:    swamyv
> remote: > Date:      2008-07-29 13:54
> remote: >
> remote: > 6710791: Remove files or build from source:maf-1_0.jar, jlfg-1_0.jar
> remote: > Summary: Removed maf-1_0.jar and jlfg-1_0.jar files.
> remote: > Reviewed-by: poonam, jjh
> remote:
> remote: Bugid 6710791 already used in this repository, in revision 20
> remote:
> remote: > Changeset: 360:fa4d1d240383
> remote: > Author:    never
> remote: > Date:      2008-08-26 15:49
> remote: >
> remote: > 6741642: bad enum definition in ciTypeFlow.hpp
> remote: > Reviewed-by: rasbold, martin
> remote: > Contributed-by: doko at ubuntu.com
> remote:
> remote: Bugid 6741642 already used in this repository, in revision 22
> remote:
> remote: > Changeset: 589:748572b86af6
> remote: > Author:    never
> remote: > Date:      2009-04-07 14:46
> remote: >
> remote: > 6636360: compiler/6595044/Main.java test fails with 64bit
> java on solaris-sparcv9 with SIGSEGV
> remote: > Reviewed-by: kvn, twisti
> remote:
> remote: Bugid 6636360 already used in this repository, in revision 29
> remote:
> remote: abort: pretxnchangegroup.0.jcheck hook failed
> remote: transaction abort!
> remote: rollback completed
> abort: unexpected response: empty string
> 
> Is there a way of getting it to ignore these for this one push?  I
> don't know of a way to just pull out these nine changesets from the
> 555 waiting to go...

I think they would need to be added to the jcheck whitelist for all time-
but that is more of a question for Mark or Kelly.

Tim