b17

[Joseph D. Darcy]

Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/10/2 Joseph D. Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
>   
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>     
>>> 2009/10/2 Andrew John Hughes <gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org>:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> 2009/10/1 Joe Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> 2009/9/30 Joe Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>> Now that HotSpot 14 is merged, are we going to have a b17 release?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>> Real soon now :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>> I thought this is what we were waiting on, but it seems more
>>>>>>>>> changesets are being added
>>>>>>>>> (http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/langtools/rev/f754eab3d93a)
>>>>>>>>> without any public discussion on the mailing list.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>> There is another javac fix to go back in b17 and a recently added
>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>> needs
>>>>>>>> to be moved.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> Ok, are these backports from OpenJDK7? I haven't seen anything on the
>>>>>>> list other than the commits.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> I'd also like to see a port of your DeoptimizeALot fix since I think
>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>> affects one of the tests currently in the OpenJDK 6 HotSpot repo.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/6886353/webrev.01/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Same bug, same bug ID, different patch.  The two tests affected in
>>>>>>> hs17 aren't present in hs14, but a test that's not in hs17 is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> Please push this change.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>> The preliminary tests I've run on b17 look good.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> What tests?  JTreg or something else?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> jtreg.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> I think IcedTea6 has support for building against hg.  We should do
>>>>>>> that before the release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> Sounds prudent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>
>>>>> Other than Andrew's fix for the HotSpot test, all the planned fixes for
>>>>> b17
>>>>> are back in the OpenJDK 6 repository now so it would be a good time to
>>>>> start
>>>>> building and testing IcedTea6 against the upstream repo.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> I committed this yesterday morning:
>>>>
>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/hotspot/rev/012339cadcba
>>>>
>>>> I'm currently working on getting IcedTea6 building with my hg
>>>> checkout, and will push this to my personal branch:
>>>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/people/andrew/icedtea6
>>>> when I'm done.  There are a lot of patches that are now redundant :)
>>>>
>>>> Are all the recent security patches in JDK6 hg?
>>>>
>>>>         
>> Yes, OpenJDK 6 is up to date on security fixes.
>>
>>     
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> --
>>>> Andrew :-)
>>>>
>>>> Free Java Software Engineer
>>>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>>>>
>>>> Support Free Java!
>>>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
>>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
>>>> http://openjdk.java.net
>>>>
>>>> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
>>>> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> It seems hs14 doesn't have the IgnoreUnrecognizedVMOptions flag
>>> itself.  This webrev:
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/6788376/
>>>
>>> backported from OpenJDK7:
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/hotspot-rt/hotspot/rev/323728917cf4
>>> adds it.  It also includes the change to the test I added with the
>>> last changeset.
>>>
>>> It seems this was added to IcedTea6 but not backported to OpenJDK6.
>>>
>>> Ok to push?
>>>
>>>       
>> Yes, approved to push.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Joe
>>
>>
>>     
>
> Thanks, pushed: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/hotspot/rev/f6c52a081457
>
> A version of IcedTea6 which builds against current hg (which will
> become b17) is now available in
> http://icedtea.classpath.org/people/andrew/icedtea6
>
> The langtools JTreg tests all pass, as do the HotSpot tests in OpenJDK6.
>
> There is a testcase related to
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6707044 which was
> never added upstream when the bug was fixed, and which seems to have
> been disabled in IcedTea when we switched to hs14.  Re-enabling it
> shows that this fails with b17.
>
> ----------messages:(3/133)----------
> command: main  -XbatchLuceneCrash
> reason: User specified action: run main/othervm -Xbatch LuceneCrash
> elapsed time (seconds): 0.203
> ----------System.out:(18/635)----------
> #
> # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
> #
> #  SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00002ba66acd4b50, pid=23877, tid=47996055058704
> #
> # JRE version: 6.0-b16
> # Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (14.0-b16 mixed mode linux-amd64 )
> # Distribution: Custom build (Fri Oct  2 21:43:43 BST 2009)
> # Problematic frame:
> # V  [libjvm.so+0x58fb50]
>
> It claims to produce a log under JTwork/scratch but I don't see one.
>
> I haven't run the whole JDK test suite.  I may leave it running overnight.
>   

Hello.

Any results for the jdk/test regression tests?

-Joe