b17

[Andrew John Hughes]

2009/10/8 Joseph D. Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>> 2009/10/7 Joe Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
>>
>>>
>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2009/10/7 Andrew John Hughes <gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2009/10/7 Joe Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2009/10/5 Joseph D. Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [big snip]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any results for the jdk/test regression tests?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> JDK: Test results: passed: 3,269; failed: 168; error: 3
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The failed seems high, the number of errors matches our usual JTreg
>>>>>>> runs.  I'll have to take a closer look but I don't usually do runs on
>>>>>>> this box.  What were your own results like for OpenJDK6 b17?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My results for building OpenJDK 6 on Ubuntu 9.04 x64 and running tests
>>>>>> there
>>>>>> are:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> hotspot/test:
>>>>>> Test results: passed: 24
>>>>>>
>>>>>> langtools/test:
>>>>>> Test results: passed: 1354
>>>>>>
>>>>>> jdk/test:
>>>>>> Test results: passed: 3,100; failed: 43; error: 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All test suites were run with "-a -ignore:quiet"; in addition,
>>>>>> langtools
>>>>>> was
>>>>>> run with "-s".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've uploaded my summary.txt files to:
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/OpenJDK6-jtreg-pre-b17/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (The jdk tests were run a bit differently than my usual test setup
>>>>>> where
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> point the graphical tests into a virtual framefer.  In this case, I
>>>>>> just
>>>>>> ran
>>>>>> the tests without redirecting the graphics.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I haven't looked at the IcedTea patch set recently; if the Gervill
>>>>>> sound
>>>>>> tests are still being duplicated, I think the IcedTea copies can be
>>>>>> removed
>>>>>> at this point since Karl is keeping the OpenJDK 6 copy of the code and
>>>>>> tests
>>>>>> up-to-date.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, the majority of JDK failures I'm seeing are not an issue; they are
>>>>> either compile failures from the optional NIO2 backport in IcedTea6 or
>>>>> headless exceptions for the AWT/Swing stuff.  The former are known to
>>>>> fail, as I just haven't had time to backport the tests.  This isn't a
>>>>> major issue as most IcedTea6 builds don't enable the backport anyway.
>>>>> The headless exceptions are also expected given the tests were run in
>>>>> screen without any virtual framebuffer.  Perhaps we should have the
>>>>> check-jdk target use Xvfb by default?
>>>>>
>>>>> Two Gervill tests fail:
>>>>>
>>>>> javax/sound/midi/Gervill/SoftReceiver/GetMidiDevice.java (compile
>>>>> failure)
>>>>> javax/sound/midi/Gervill/SoftChannel/NoteOverFlowTest2.java :
>>>>> IndexOutOfBounds
>>>>>
>>>>> The rest seem to be related to java.beans (can't find java.awt.Color
>>>>> -- possibly a headless issue again) or crypto (having ECC enabled
>>>>> seems to cause additional failures).
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think there's anything that's a stopper for b17, especially as
>>>>> your results seem pretty good (and the failures seem the same as we've
>>>>> seen).  We just need to make some decisions on how to resolve the
>>>>> differences between the IcedTea6 and plain OpenJDK6 builds.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>> --
>>>>> Andrew :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Free Java Software Engineer
>>>>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>>>>>
>>>>> Support Free Java!
>>>>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
>>>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
>>>>> http://openjdk.java.net
>>>>>
>>>>> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
>>>>> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My results are being pushed to http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/jdk/
>>>> now.  Should be there shortly.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> Below is the jtdiff between my OpenJDK 6 test/jdk regression tests and
>>> your
>>> IcedTea test/jdk tests.
>>>
>>> Most of the additional passes are the duplicated Gervill tests and most
>>> of
>>> the failures differences are from the awt configuration issue (and the
>>> nio2
>>> backport).
>>>
>>> So I think this looks pretty good.
>>>
>>> -Joe
>>>
>>> 0: 6-open/summary.txt  pass: 3,100; fail: 43; error: 1
>>> 1: IcedTea/summary.txt  pass: 3,269; fail: 168; error: 3
>>>
>
> [snip]
>
>>> 405 differences
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Ah I see the Gervill tests have moved to javax/sound/midi/Gervill.  I
>> think we should just drop the IcedTea6 duplicate now.
>>
>> Mosts of the tests do seem to be related to the NIO2 backport or
>> enabling NSS (I assume you don't turn on the later either).
>> There are some interesting passes on IcedTea that I assume we patch
>> locally still.  I presume you also have the proprietary SNMP plugs
>> which we obviously don't use.
>>
>
> No, OpenJDK 6 is all-open all the time; no proprietary anything :-)
>

Your tests pass on the following tests:

pass   ---    com/sun/jmx/snmp/SnmpOidHashCode.java
pass   ---    com/sun/jmx/snmp/TimeTicksWrapping.java

which would suggest that the binary plugs are being used to provide
the optional SNMP provider which is still proprietary.

>> In general, looks good to me too.  Let's ship b17.
>>
>
> Agreed; time to ship!

Great! :)

>
> -Joe
>
>



-- 
Andrew :-)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net

PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8