Need reviewer: jaxp/jaxws changes for openjdk6

[Joseph D. Darcy]

Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/10/28 Joseph D. Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
>   
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>     
>>> 2009/10/27 Kelly O'Hair <Kelly.Ohair at sun.com>:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Need reviewer, changes to jaxp and jaxws repositories.
>>>>
>>>> The equivalent openjdk7 jaxp/jaxws changes for openjdk6:
>>>>
>>>>  6856630: Restructure jaxp/jaxws repositories
>>>>  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk6/jdk6-jax-6856630/webrev/
>>>>
>>>> When I create the actual changesets, the jaxp/src and jaxws/src
>>>> directories
>>>> will be deleted (webrev doesn't do well with thousands of files deleted).
>>>>
>>>> For now, drop bundles are being kept at:
>>>>  http://kenai.com/projects/jdk6-drops/downloads
>>>>
>>>> -kto
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> I'll try a build with this, but it looks good from a cursory glance
>>> and based on it being a backport of the jdk7 work.
>>>
>>> With the weekend in between, I lost track of what was happening with
>>> the jdk7 version.  I take it you committed to tl.  Should I revise the
>>> ALT_DROPS_DIR patch against tl and post a new webrev?  By the look of
>>> this patch, the fix is also needed here (I see devtools lurking
>>> again).
>>>
>>> My concern, as I've just mentioned on the other thread, is how
>>> security updates will now be handled.  This is more crucial with
>>> OpenJDK6 than 7 at present, so I think we need a known strategy for
>>> this before pushing this changeset.
>>>
>>>       
>> From the other thread, after a security fix is publicly released, a revised
>> source bundle will be published.  In the interim, a patch should be applied
>> to the code before building.
>>
>> -Joe
>>
>>
>>     
>
> Ah, now it makes sense what that patches directory is for :)
>
> For the record, it built fine here.
>   

With the successful builds by Kelly and Andrew, I approve these changes 
going back into OpenJDK 6.

Thanks,

-Joe