[Fwd: Re: Upcoming changes to JDK7 build process: JIBX]
Joe Darcy
Joe.Darcy at Sun.COM
Fri Sep 11 16:31:53 PDT 2009
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/9/5 Joe Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
>
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> 2009/9/3 Andrew John Hughes <gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org>:
>>>
>>>
>>>> 2009/9/3 Joseph D. Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> 2009/8/31 Joseph D. Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Without the JIBX build dependency, I would be happy for the Nimbus
>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> be ported to OpenJDK 6.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> The other immediate problem I see with this is that the OpenJDK
>>>>>> version adds public API in the form of javax.swing.plaf.nimbus:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://builder.classpath.org/japi/openjdk7-openjdk6.html#pkg_javax_swing_plaf_nimbus
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This would need to be removed before Nimbus could be added to OpenJDK6.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I'm not familiar with the details of how Nimbus was implemented in
>>>>> the
>>>>> 6 update release without java.* or javax.* API changes.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I'll take a look either today or tomorrow and see if I can produce
>>>> something from the changesets that would work for 6. If the javax.*
>>>> classes are just a layer on top of the Sun implementation, it should
>>>> be easy enough to just remove them. I'm guessing this means Nimbus is
>>>> part of the spec. for JDK7. If only such processes were more open...
>>>> --
>>>> Andrew :-)
>>>>
>>>> Free Java Software Engineer
>>>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>>>>
>>>> Support Free Java!
>>>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
>>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
>>>> http://openjdk.java.net
>>>>
>>>> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
>>>> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Ok so it appears Nimbus was in com.sun.java.swing.plaf.nimbus for the
>>> proprietary JDK6 release (there are backwards compatibility hooks
>>> there instead in OpenJDK7). So I just reversed that move for our
>>> version.
>>>
>>> Here's a webrev for the first Nimbus patch:
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/6591875/webrev/jdk.patch
>>>
>>> This is just Nimbus as first imported with the JIBX requirement. It's
>>> already a big patch without bringing in all the Nimbus changes that
>>> occurred afterwards (there are 10 further changesets) My plan is to
>>> backport each Nimbus-related changeset separately so that we
>>> correspond as closely as possible with OpenJDK7 (and the same goes for
>>> any pertinent future fixes).
>>>
>>> Does this look ok to push? I've done a test build and was able to run
>>> a simple Swing application using the Nimbus look and feel
>>> (http://blog.fuseyism.com/index.php/2009/04/09/nimbus-arrives/)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> Monday is a holiday in the US so I won't be able to start looking at this
>> until later next week.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Joe
>>
>>
>
> Ok, no problem. Thanks for keeping me in the loop :)
>
Andrew,
With the recent jcheck update, I'd like to get the HS upgrade in OpenJDK
6 (at long last!!) and an OpenJDK 6 build promoted for the HS upgrade +
security fixes before the Nimbus work goes back. So I hope to start
looking at the Nimbus changes next week.
Sorry for the delay,
-Joe
More information about the jdk6-dev
mailing list