Test Backports

Joe Darcy joe.darcy at oracle.com
Wed Apr 14 18:03:58 PDT 2010


On 04/11/10 01:42 PM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 10 April 2010 03:40, Kelly O'Hair <kelly.ohair at oracle.com> wrote:
>   
>> On Apr 9, 2010, at 7:20 PM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> On 10 April 2010 01:48, Kelly O'Hair <kelly.ohair at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> On Apr 9, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Just waiting on Kelly's reponse now wrt. the HotSpot source/target fix.
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> Can you clarify what response you are waiting on?
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Yes, sorry it's this one:
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2010-April/001464.html
>>>
>>> It wasn't clear whether you were ok with the HotSpot change or wanted
>>> more time to review.  The patch is pretty much as-is in OpenJDK7, the
>>> only difference being the version change from 6 to 5.
>>>       
>> The hotspot file changes look ok, but I have no idea how the hotspot
>> changes are being handled for openjdk6.
>>     
>
> We regularly import from the stablisation branches:
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hsx14/master/ (OpenJDK6 b17 & b18)
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hsx16/master/ (OpenJDK6 b19)
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hsx17/master/ (OpenJDK6 b20?)
>
> The last one, hs17, includes the OpenJDK7 version of this fix.
> Including an OpenJDK6 version now with 1.5 source and target versions
> has the advantage that we won't bring in a version that requires
> source and target versions of 1.6 from hs17.
>
> Joe, does b20 sound appropriate for hs17?  I know it's a bit soon
> after hs16, but the proprietary JDK6 is already moving towards this
> and we could do with catching up.  It will be take time for such an
> OpenJDK6 release to roll through into an IcedTea6 release and then the
> distros anyway, so I'd prefer sooner rather than later.
>
>   

I'm not sure of the timeline for hs17.

At some point, the copyright notices in the OpenJDK 6 repo will be 
changed from Sun -> Oracle.  A more general announcement about this 
process and the new conventions will be forthcoming.  Making these 
copyright changes, at least in the langtools and jdk repos, might 
warrant a separate build with just those changes, in which case the 
upgrade of the HotSpot sources to HS 17 (with changed copyrights?) might 
occur in build 21 or later.

-Joe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/attachments/20100414/9d24a481/attachment.html 


More information about the jdk6-dev mailing list