Regression test results on latest pre-b19 -- repos tagged with b19 - b19 complete!

[Joseph D. Darcy]

Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
> Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> On 12 April 2010 17:53, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>  
>>>> Hello.
>>>>
>>>> I did a fresh build with all the latest changes and ran the 
>>>> regression test
>>>> suite.  As before, all the HotSpot and langtools tests pass.  I 
>>>> think these
>>>> results are good enough for b19.
>>>>
>
> [snip]
>
>>>>
>>>> -Joe
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>
>>> Looks good to me.  I don't see any regressions (pass-->fail).
>>>   
>>
>> And there are lots more passing tests :-)
>>
>> Other than the Gervill fix under review, I don't have any other 
>> outstanding changes to get into b19.  Assuming the Gervill fix goes 
>> back soon and the test results are consistent, I'll label the repos 
>> post-fix as b19.
>>
>
> The tests results were consistent as expected.  I've tagged the repos 
> with b19 and the usual source bundles, etc. should follow within a few 
> days.
>

Source bundles posted:
http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk6/promoted/b19/openjdk-6-src-b19-15_apr_2010.tar.gz

OpenJDK 6 build 19 is done, on to build 20!

As implied in some other recent messages to the list, I was considering 
having OpenJDK 6 build 20 be dedicated to updating the copyrights in the 
repositories from Sun -> Oracle.  That is not terribly compelling 
technically, but it would make the administration of this change easier.

In the next build open to technical changes, what changes are of interest?

-Joe

PS The security issue recently fixed in the proprietary 6u20 does *not* 
impact OpenJDK 6.