Regression test results on latest pre-b19 -- repos tagged with b19 - b19 complete!

Andrew John Hughes ahughes at redhat.com
Fri Apr 16 06:31:58 PDT 2010


On 16 April 2010 03:34, Joseph D. Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com> wrote:
> Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
>>
>> Joe Darcy wrote:
>>>
>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 12 April 2010 17:53, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>
>>>>> I did a fresh build with all the latest changes and ran the regression
>>>>> test
>>>>> suite.  As before, all the HotSpot and langtools tests pass.  I think
>>>>> these
>>>>> results are good enough for b19.
>>>>>
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Looks good to me.  I don't see any regressions (pass-->fail).
>>>>
>>>
>>> And there are lots more passing tests :-)
>>>
>>> Other than the Gervill fix under review, I don't have any other
>>> outstanding changes to get into b19.  Assuming the Gervill fix goes back
>>> soon and the test results are consistent, I'll label the repos post-fix as
>>> b19.
>>>
>>
>> The tests results were consistent as expected.  I've tagged the repos with
>> b19 and the usual source bundles, etc. should follow within a few days.
>>
>
> Source bundles posted:
> http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk6/promoted/b19/openjdk-6-src-b19-15_apr_2010.tar.gz
>
> OpenJDK 6 build 19 is done, on to build 20!
>

IcedTea6 now bumped to b19 too.

> As implied in some other recent messages to the list, I was considering
> having OpenJDK 6 build 20 be dedicated to updating the copyrights in the
> repositories from Sun -> Oracle.  That is not terribly compelling
> technically, but it would make the administration of this change easier.
>
> In the next build open to technical changes, what changes are of interest?
>

hs17 would be my primary one, though as I suggested in another mail,
it may make more sense to include this in the license updating.

There's a fix I just posted to tl which needs backporting:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/c444651077d2

I need to review what we have in IcedTea6 to see what else is needed.

> -Joe
>
> PS The security issue recently fixed in the proprietary 6u20 does *not*
> impact OpenJDK 6.

Probably because the Webstart code was never open-sourced... hey,
there is a good side to it after all! :-)

>



-- 
Andrew :-)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net

PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8


More information about the jdk6-dev mailing list