Need reviewers for changes in java/net regression tests

[Pavel Tisnovsky]

Joe Darcy wrote:
> Hello Pavel.
> 
> In principle, I approve this sort of change, but I'd like some
> clarifications before granting final approval
> 
> Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tried to backport more regression tests from OpenJDK7 to OpenJDK6.
>> Webrev with changes is available at:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptisnovs/JavaNetJTregTests/
>>   
> 
> It would be helpful to know what JDK 7 changesets these fixes came from
> and what the differences from the JDK 7 changes are in OpenJDK 6.

Hi Joe,

many of these fixes came from
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/58f325ba3e27
which was made by Chris to fixe bug
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6969395

Is it possible to push the fixes with this bug ID in case I didn't
included all changes because of differences between JDK6 and JDK7?

> 
>> Can anyone please review the changes?
>>
>> There are still minor differences between OpenJDK6 and OpenJDK7 tests,
>> mainly due to syntax enhancements in OpenJDK7.
>>
>> Please note that new test case (deserialization an Inet6 address with
>> a named interface) is included in
>> Inet6Address/serialize/Serialize.java regression test:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptisnovs/JavaNetJTregTests/test/java/net/Inet6Address/serialize/Serialize.java.cdiff.html
>>
>>
>> This issue which was fixed in OpenJDK7 but not in OpenJDK6 yet. Btw -
>> do anyone know, if this issue will be fixed in OpenJDK6?
>>   
> 
> Generally, the @bug list in the test should indicate what bugs the test
> addresses.  Is there a changeset for bug  6656849?  If so, you could
> request approval to backport it.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -Joe
> 
>> The changes made in these test are really minor and they are based
>> (but not equal) on changes done by Christopher Hegarthy in OpenJDK7:
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/58f325ba3e27
>> (these changes are reviewed by Alan Bateman)
>>
>> Cheers
>> Pavel Tisnovsky
>>   
>