hg: jdk6/jdk6/hotspot: 3 new changesets
Kelly O'Hair
Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM
Wed Feb 17 16:24:43 PST 2010
On 2/17/10 2:36 PM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 17 February 2010 22:32, Kelly O'Hair<Kelly.Ohair at sun.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/17/10 2:08 PM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>> On 17 February 2010 20:05, Kelly O'Hair<Kelly.Ohair at sun.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2/17/10 10:45 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 15 December 2009 01:47,<daniel.daugherty at sun.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Changeset: 98cd9901c161
>>>>>>> Author: dcubed
>>>>>>> Date: 2009-12-14 10:05 -0700
>>>>>>> URL:http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/hotspot/rev/98cd9901c161
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 6849968: 3/2 JVMTI tests fails on jdk5.0 with hs14
>>>>>>> Summary: If a JVMTI agent asks for version 1.0, then it should get
>>>>>>> version 1.0 semantics.
>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: dholmes, ohair
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ! src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiEnv.cpp
>>>>>>> ! src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiEnvBase.cpp
>>>>>>> ! src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiEnvBase.hpp
>>>>>>> ! src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiExport.cpp
>>>>>>> ! src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiExport.hpp
>>>>>>> ! src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiHpp.xsl
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When trying to update OpenJDK6 to HotSpot 16 this is causing a build
>>>>>> failure:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> g++ -DLINUX -D_GNU_SOURCE -DAMD64 -DPRODUCT -I. -I../generated/adfiles
>>>>>> -I../generated/jvmtifiles
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/asm
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/ci
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/classfile
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/code
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/compiler
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/gc_implementation
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/gc_implementation/concurrentMarkSweep
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/gc_implementation/shared
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/gc_implementation/g1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/gc_implementation/parNew
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/gc_implementation/parallelScavenge
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/gc_interface
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/interpreter
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/libadt
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/memory
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/oops
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/opto
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/prims
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/runtime
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/services
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/utilities
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/cpu/x86/vm
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/os/linux/vm
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -I/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/os_cpu/linux_x86/vm
>>>>>> -I../generated -DHOTSPOT_RELEASE_VERSION="\"16.0-b13\""
>>>>>> -DHOTSPOT_BUILD_TARGET="\"product\"" -DHOTSPOT_BUILD_USER="\"andrew\""
>>>>>> -DHOTSPOT_LIB_ARCH=\"amd64\"
>>>>>> -DJRE_RELEASE_VERSION="\"1.6.0-internal-andrew_17_feb_2010_12_54-b00\""
>>>>>> -DHOTSPOT_VM_DISTRO="\"OpenJDK\"" -DCOMPILER2 -fPIC -fno-rtti
>>>>>> -fno-exceptions -D_REENTRANT -fcheck-new -m64 -pipe -O3
>>>>>> -fno-strict-aliasing -DVM_LITTLE_ENDIAN -D_LP64=1
>>>>>> -fno-omit-frame-pointer -Werror -Wpointer-arith -Wsign-compare -c
>>>>>> -o jvmtiEnvThreadState.o
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiEnvThreadState.cpp
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiEnvBase.cpp:126:
>>>>>> error: prototype for 'JvmtiEnvBase::JvmtiEnvBase()' does not match any
>>>>>> in class 'JvmtiEnvBase'
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiEnvBase.hpp:44:
>>>>>> error: candidates are: JvmtiEnvBase::JvmtiEnvBase(const JvmtiEnvBase&)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/jdk6/hotspot/src/share/vm/prims/jvmtiEnvBase.hpp:95:
>>>>>> error: JvmtiEnvBase::JvmtiEnvBase(jint)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is the fix still necessary? If so,is there an appropriate default
>>>>>> version we could use to provide a no-arg constructor again?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, the fix is necessary. I'm a bit confused why you would think
>>>>> that it was not still necessary. From the context you provided here
>>>>> I'm not sure why you need a no-args constructor. I pushed this
>>>>> changeset to HSX-16.2 for that release's b01 snapshot back when I
>>>>> fixed this bug. I suspect that the same port can be used in HSX16
>>>>> for OpenJDK6...
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is this an issue with the version of g++ used?
>>>> On Fedora 9 we use:
>>>> g++ (GCC) 4.3.0 20080428 (Red Hat 4.3.0-8)
>>>>
>>>> What version of g++ is complaining? Just a thought.
>>>
>>> No I'm pretty sure it's complaining because Dan's patch does this:
>>>
>>> - JvmtiEnvBase();
>>> + JvmtiEnvBase(jint version);
>>>
>>> Fedora 9 is now unsupported so you should be using at least F11.
>>
>> Sigh... We currently use Fedora 9 as the official build system for JDK7,
>> I guess we need to update those systems, and any others we use for builds.
>> Don't know when that will happen.
>>
>
> Yeah :-( Fedora is good for catching breakage due to new
> library/interface changes, but not for a stable build system. You
> really need RHEL for that, which is why I thought it strange you
> switch from RH AS to Fedora rather than RHEL. It's pretty much the
> most bleeding edge distribution I know of.
We picked Fedora because it was freely available with no 'pay for updates'.
When I tried to install a RedHat, it insisted on a support contract number,
it stated that you would not get any updates without it.
Since I wanted updates, and did not have a support contract, I gave up
on RedHat installations.
Have things changed?
Perhaps we need to see if our new company has a RedHat support contract
we can use for the JDK build machines and developer machines. ;^)
-kto
More information about the jdk6-dev
mailing list