OK to backport 6511613 ?
Joseph D. Darcy
Joe.Darcy at Sun.COM
Wed Feb 24 13:19:40 PST 2010
Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> (Fixed subject line for correct bug number)
Still okay to backport :-)
-Joe
>
> Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Joe,
>>
>> Is it OK to backport this fix to 6-open?
>>
>> -- Jon
>>
>>> Changeset: 6eca0895a644
>>> Author: jjg
>>> Date: 2010-02-23 18:43 -0800
>>> URL:
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/langtools/rev/6eca0895a644
>>>
>>> 6511613: javac unexpectedly doesn't fail in some cases if an
>>> annotation processor specified
>>> Reviewed-by: darcy
>>>
>>> ! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/comp/Attr.java
>>> ! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/main/JavaCompiler.java
>>> !
>>> src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/processing/JavacProcessingEnvironment.java
>>>
>>> ! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/util/Log.java
>>> + test/tools/javac/processing/6511613/DummyProcessor.java
>>> + test/tools/javac/processing/6511613/clss41701.java
>>>
>
More information about the jdk6-dev
mailing list