[Bug 100017] XML encoder can cause a StackOverflowError

Joe Wang joe.wang at sun.com
Fri Jan 22 10:42:24 PST 2010


Mark,

Thanks for the comment.  Since JAXP itself is an open source project, 
this fix was done in JAXP and then integrated into JDK7. In JAXP, I kept 
the Red Hat Copyright header and noted that it was contributed by Omair 
Majid who originally created the bug report. I did add GNU+CDDL license 
header which I will remove from the jaxp project. This test has not been 
integrated into OpenJDK. I'll pass the comment to SQE who would be 
responsible for integrating tests.

During a discussion for 100123, I was told I could not use the 
patch/test unless the contributor has signed the SCA. I'll check with 
legal again on this.

Andrew:  have you or Omair signed the SCA?

Thanks,
Joe

Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 15:59 -0800, Joe Darcy wrote:
>   
>> Note that at the moment the license header of the test files says 
>> "Copyright 2009 Red Hat" but later states "Please contact Sun 
>> Microsystems ... if you need additional information or have any 
>> questions."  If this goes upstream, the copyright holder should be 
>> changed to Sun.
>>     
>
> Just for the record, as Mark Reinhold previously stated you must never
> remove copyright notices. Contributors keep the copyright over their
> code. You can only add an extra copyright notice. Mark explains when: 
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7-dev/2009-June/000716.html
> (Of course if contributed through the SCA, Sun then gets all the rights
> from the copyright owner to license and redistribute the code under the
> GPL.)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/attachments/20100122/224a0ff7/attachment.html 


More information about the jdk6-dev mailing list