[Bug 100017] XML encoder can cause a StackOverflowError
Joe Wang
joe.wang at sun.com
Fri Jan 22 10:42:24 PST 2010
Mark,
Thanks for the comment. Since JAXP itself is an open source project,
this fix was done in JAXP and then integrated into JDK7. In JAXP, I kept
the Red Hat Copyright header and noted that it was contributed by Omair
Majid who originally created the bug report. I did add GNU+CDDL license
header which I will remove from the jaxp project. This test has not been
integrated into OpenJDK. I'll pass the comment to SQE who would be
responsible for integrating tests.
During a discussion for 100123, I was told I could not use the
patch/test unless the contributor has signed the SCA. I'll check with
legal again on this.
Andrew: have you or Omair signed the SCA?
Thanks,
Joe
Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 15:59 -0800, Joe Darcy wrote:
>
>> Note that at the moment the license header of the test files says
>> "Copyright 2009 Red Hat" but later states "Please contact Sun
>> Microsystems ... if you need additional information or have any
>> questions." If this goes upstream, the copyright holder should be
>> changed to Sun.
>>
>
> Just for the record, as Mark Reinhold previously stated you must never
> remove copyright notices. Contributors keep the copyright over their
> code. You can only add an extra copyright notice. Mark explains when:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7-dev/2009-June/000716.html
> (Of course if contributed through the SCA, Sun then gets all the rights
> from the copyright owner to license and redistribute the code under the
> GPL.)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/attachments/20100122/224a0ff7/attachment.html
More information about the jdk6-dev
mailing list