hg: jdk6/jdk6/jdk: 6969395: TEST_BUG: Tests in java/net sun/net problems
Joe Darcy
joe.darcy at oracle.com
Thu Jul 22 10:35:10 PDT 2010
Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
> Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
>>> Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 22 July 2010 17:24, <ptisnovs at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Changeset: 13939cd62507
>>>>> Author: ptisnovs
>>>>> Date: 2010-07-22 18:22 +0200
>>>>> URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/13939cd62507
>>>>>
>>>>> 6969395: TEST_BUG: Tests in java/net sun/net problems
>>>>> Summary: Synchronization of HttpServlet regression test with OpenJDK7
>>>>> Reviewed-by: chegar
>>>>>
>>>>> ! test/com/sun/net/httpserver/Test1.java
>>>>> ! test/com/sun/net/httpserver/Test11.java
>>>>> ! test/com/sun/net/httpserver/Test12.java
>>>>> ! test/com/sun/net/httpserver/Test13.java
>>>>> ! test/com/sun/net/httpserver/Test6a.java
>>>>> ! test/com/sun/net/httpserver/Test7a.java
>>>>> ! test/com/sun/net/httpserver/Test8a.java
>>>>> ! test/com/sun/net/httpserver/Test9.java
>>>>> ! test/com/sun/net/httpserver/Test9a.java
>>>>> ! test/com/sun/net/httpserver/bugs/B6361557.java
>>>>> ! test/com/sun/net/httpserver/bugs/B6373555.java
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> This shouldn't have been committed without approval from Joe Darcy.
>>>>
>> Yes, I was just composing email on about this ;-)
>>
>>> I'm very sorry that I forgot to inform (or wait for) Joe before I
>>> committed changes to OpenJDK6. It really was not on purpose :-)
>>>
>>
>> I retroactively approve these test changes for OpenJDK 6.
> Thank you! Do I have to commit the changes again?
No, they can only be committed once!
>>
>> -Joe
>>
>> PS We may also want to look at porting over other recent test fixes
>> in JDK 7 that have addressed tests on the problem list:
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/log/9cb77130999f/test/ProblemList.txt
>
> Yes my plan is to check (probably next week), which JDK7 tests could
> be synchronized with JDK6.
>
Sounds good.
-Joe
More information about the jdk6-dev
mailing list