Backporting changeset from 7 to 6 for bugfix

Tue Jun 15 11:11:41 PDT 2010

On 15 June 2010 16:30, Andrew John Hughes <ahughes at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 15 June 2010 13:21, Andrew John Hughes <ahughes at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 15 June 2010 01:10, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> Joe Darcy wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11 June 2010 05:31, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Joe Darcy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10 June 2010 02:02, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Andrew Su wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> changeset:   2208:0137b5857c63
>>>>>>>> parent:      2183:90248595ec35
>>>>>>>> user:        okutsu
>>>>>>>> date:        Wed Mar 10 14:32:47 2010 +0900
>>>>>>>> summary:     6932473: (tz) javazic produces incorrect SimpleTimeZone
>>>>>>>> parameters with Sun<=7
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do these look ok?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes; also approved to go back.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since some Sun copyrighted files have leaked back in, we'll done
>>>>>>> another
>>>>>>> pass to clean up any such files before b20 goes final.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think only a few more changes are needed to wrap up b20:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * The various backports identified in the earlier message in this thread
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Done now.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Backport of 6957375 "java/net/ResponseCache getResponseCode and
>>>>>> ResponseCacheTest fail after rebranding"
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I see this come in while I was backporting; had to merge.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * One more pass of the Sun -> Oracle copyright script
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> There are some new Zero bugfixes that could be backported for b20 (and
>>>>> would allow us to drop the local copy in IcedTea6).
>>>>> I've CCed Gary Benson who should be able to provide a list of bug IDs
>>>>> for backport.
>>>>>
>>>>> Other than that, we should be good to go with b20.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Being able to drop the copy of Zero in IcedTea sounds worthwhile.  After
>>>> looking over the bugids and a webrev, I'd expect to approve those fixes
>>>> going back.
>>>>
>>>> The Zero fixes are the last currently planned fixes for b20.
>>>>
>>>> -Joe
>>>
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I'd like to get b20 wrapped up in the next day or two; please provide a list
>>> of the Zeros bug and I webrev so I can look them over.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> -Joe
>>>
>>
>> I was waiting for a response from Gary with the bug IDs, but looks
>> like one isn't forthcoming.  I'll compile a list from recent OpenJDK7
>> build drops and post that shortly.
>>
>> There's also http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2010-June/001750.html
>> which causes build breakage with IcedTea.
>> --
>> Andrew :-)
>>
>> Free Java Software Engineer
>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>>
>> Support Free Java!
>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
>> http://openjdk.java.net
>>
>> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
>> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
>>
>
> b87
> ==
>
> 6934089  Zero 32-bit/64kb page fix
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/da06d1795d84
>
> b90
> ===
>
> 6939180  Zero locking fix
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/747d26efc5fa
>
> b92
> ===
>
> 6941224: Improved stack overflow handling for Zero
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/f9271ff9d324
>
> 6944503: Improved Zero crash dump
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/c544d979f886
>
> 6944473: 6941224 misses new files
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/aa9c266de52a
>
> b94
> ===
>
> 6939182: Zero JNI handles fix
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/0c5b3cf3c1f5
>
> 6950178: Zero stack improvements
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/348346af6676
>
> 6950617: Zero/Shark interface updates
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/6cfbdb113e52
>
> 6951784: Zero deoptimizer changes
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/22af4ce8dba1
>
> b96
> ===
>
> 6951686: Using large pages on Linux prevents zero based compressed oops
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/79bf863697eb
>
> Here's the webrev for those:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/zero/webrev.05/ and the previous
> Nimbus one: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/nimbus/webrev.07/
>
> The following were skipped due to the referenced changesets not being
> in OpenJDK6:
>
> 6939731: JSR 292 Zero build fix after 6934494
> 6944028:         6940701 broke Zero
> 6949830: 6939134 broke Zero
>
> 6949423: remove tagged stack interpreter for Zero
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/68d6683eaef7
> Depends on:
> changeset:   1426:2338d41fbd81
> user:        twisti
> date:        Fri Apr 30 08:37:24 2010 -0700
> summary:     6943304: remove tagged stack interpreter
>
> --
> Andrew :-)
>
> Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>
> Support Free Java!
> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
> http://openjdk.java.net
>
> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
>

Scratch 6951686; the mention of 'zero' mislead me.  It's not a Zero fix.

Let me know when I can push the rest,

Cheers,
-- 
Andrew :-)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net

PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8