Backporting changeset from 7 to 6 for bugfix
Andrew John Hughes
ahughes at redhat.com
Thu Jun 17 10:39:30 PDT 2010
On 17 June 2010 17:38, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>> On 17 June 2010 10:20, Andrew John Hughes <ahughes at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 17 June 2010 09:41, Andrew John Hughes <ahughes at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 17 June 2010 09:02, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 17 June 2010 00:59, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 16 June 2010 01:54, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 15 June 2010 16:30, Andrew John Hughes <ahughes at redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 15 June 2010 13:21, Andrew John Hughes <ahughes at redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15 June 2010 01:10, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Darcy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11 June 2010 05:31, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Darcy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 June 2010 02:02, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew Su wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changeset: 2208:0137b5857c63
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parent: 2183:90248595ec35
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user: okutsu
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date: Wed Mar 10 14:32:47 2010 +0900
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> summary: 6932473: (tz) javazic produces incorrect
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SimpleTimeZone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parameters with Sun<=7
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do these look ok?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes; also approved to go back.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since some Sun copyrighted files have leaked back in, we'll
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass to clean up any such files before b20 goes final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think only a few more changes are needed to wrap up b20:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * The various backports identified in the earlier message in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Backport of 6957375 "java/net/ResponseCache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getResponseCode
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ResponseCacheTest fail after rebranding"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see this come in while I was backporting; had to merge.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * One more pass of the Sun -> Oracle copyright script
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are some new Zero bugfixes that could be backported for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b20
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would allow us to drop the local copy in IcedTea6).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've CCed Gary Benson who should be able to provide a list of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IDs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for backport.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, we should be good to go with b20.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being able to drop the copy of Zero in IcedTea sounds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worthwhile.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looking over the bugids and a webrev, I'd expect to approve
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going back.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Zero fixes are the last currently planned fixes for b20.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to get b20 wrapped up in the next day or two; please
>>>>>>>>>>>>> provide
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the Zeros bug and I webrev so I can look them over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for a response from Gary with the bug IDs, but
>>>>>>>>>>>> looks
>>>>>>>>>>>> like one isn't forthcoming. I'll compile a list from recent
>>>>>>>>>>>> OpenJDK7
>>>>>>>>>>>> build drops and post that shortly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There's also
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2010-June/001750.html
>>>>>>>>>>>> which causes build breakage with IcedTea.
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Free Java Software Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Support Free Java!
>>>>>>>>>>>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://openjdk.java.net
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> b87
>>>>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 6934089 Zero 32-bit/64kb page fix
>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/da06d1795d84
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> b90
>>>>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 6939180 Zero locking fix
>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/747d26efc5fa
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> b92
>>>>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 6941224: Improved stack overflow handling for Zero
>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/f9271ff9d324
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 6944503: Improved Zero crash dump
>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/c544d979f886
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 6944473: 6941224 misses new files
>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/aa9c266de52a
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> These are hs18 Zero fixes. hs18 also includes 6944028 "6940701
>>>>>>>>> broke
>>>>>>>>> Zero,"
>>>>>>>>> but that fix is not needed in OpenJDK 6 yet since we don't have the
>>>>>>>>> fix
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>> 6940701 from hs18, as you note below.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Approved to go back.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> b94
>>>>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 6939182: Zero JNI handles fix
>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/0c5b3cf3c1f5
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 6950178: Zero stack improvements
>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/348346af6676
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 6950617: Zero/Shark interface updates
>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/6cfbdb113e52
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 6951784: Zero deoptimizer changes
>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/22af4ce8dba1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> All of these are in hs19 and are approved to go back. The bug
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 6960550 Missing semicolon in Zero
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> is "fixed" in hs19, but not yet integrated. At your option, you
>>>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>>>> apply
>>>>>>>>> this fix to OpenJDK 6 now too.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ok, I only looked at integrated fixes. But this fix looks simple
>>>>>>>> enough and as you approve, I've backported it too :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm surprised it even builds without the semi-colon but I guess
>>>>>>>> that's
>>>>>>>> C++ for you ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> b96
>>>>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 6951686: Using large pages on Linux prevents zero based
>>>>>>>>>>> compressed
>>>>>>>>>>> oops
>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/79bf863697eb
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Here's the webrev for those:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/zero/webrev.05/ and the
>>>>>>>>>>> previous
>>>>>>>>>>> Nimbus one: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/nimbus/webrev.07/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I approve the -source 6/-target 6 changes for Nimbus; I don't think
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> wholesale change to -source 6/-target 6 is necessary.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please use 6961536 "Nimbus code using @Override break
>>>>>>>>> OpenJDK/IcedBuild
>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>> ecj" for the push.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The following were skipped due to the referenced changesets not
>>>>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>>>>> in OpenJDK6:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 6939731: JSR 292 Zero build fix after 6934494
>>>>>>>>>>> 6944028: 6940701 broke Zero
>>>>>>>>>>> 6949830: 6939134 broke Zero
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 6949423: remove tagged stack interpreter for Zero
>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/68d6683eaef7
>>>>>>>>>>> Depends on:
>>>>>>>>>>> changeset: 1426:2338d41fbd81
>>>>>>>>>>> user: twisti
>>>>>>>>>>> date: Fri Apr 30 08:37:24 2010 -0700
>>>>>>>>>>> summary: 6943304: remove tagged stack interpreter
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've checked the bug database and all the Zero fixes in hs18 and
>>>>>>>>> hs19
>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>> somehow addressed in this email thread.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Free Java Software Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Support Free Java!
>>>>>>>>>>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
>>>>>>>>>>> http://openjdk.java.net
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
>>>>>>>>>>> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Scratch 6951686; the mention of 'zero' mislead me. It's not a
>>>>>>>>>> Zero
>>>>>>>>>> fix.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Let me know when I can push the rest,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Good to push!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All pushed!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for the pushes!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With the integration of 6961870 "More rebranding fixes for
>>>>>>> templates/gpl-*-header files," which I just pushed, I believe that is
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> last change for b20. I will tag the repos accordingly pending
>>>>>>> successful
>>>>>>> results from a round of sanity building and testing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't want to drag b20 out any longer either, but I think it's
>>>>>> probably worth doing a final sync of HotSpot to hs17b16, which was
>>>>>> just announced:
>>>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2010-June/001781.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you recall, we brought in 6955813: Fix incorrect Oracle rebranding
>>>>>> headers from 6941466 already so we now have hs17b15 + that fix. I
>>>>>> think it would be better to have OpenJDK6 builds use a known HotSpot
>>>>>> tag, which syncing with hs17b16 would give us. It actually only means
>>>>>> bringing in one more real fix: 6953058: G1: A bigapp crashes with
>>>>>> SIGSEGV in compiled code
>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hsx17/master/rev/d53d91cb378c which
>>>>>> sounds important.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, I suppose we can have *one* more sync with HotSpot for b20;
>>>>> you're
>>>>> approved to sync hs17b15 into OpenJDK 6.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks! Done.
>>>> --
>>>> Andrew :-)
>>>>
>>>> Free Java Software Engineer
>>>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>>>>
>>>> Support Free Java!
>>>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
>>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
>>>> http://openjdk.java.net
>>>>
>>>> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
>>>> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Impressively quick reply btw -- didn't you get this about 1am over there?
>>>
>
> I keep late hours sometimes :-) (I was actually waiting for a test run on
> the repo without the fix to complete.)
>
>>> --
>>> Andrew :-)
>>>
>>> Free Java Software Engineer
>>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>>>
>>> Support Free Java!
>>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
>>> http://openjdk.java.net
>>>
>>> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
>>> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
>>>
>>>
>>
>> In comparing Zero in OpenJDK6 against the version in IcedTea, I found
>> that a couple of Sun Microsystems copyrights have sneaked back in:
>>
>> src/cpu/zero/vm/stack_zero.cpp: * Copyright 2003-2007 Sun
>> Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
>> src/cpu/zero/vm/stack_zero.cpp: * Please contact Sun Microsystems,
>> Inc., 4150 Network Circle, Santa Clara,
>> src/cpu/zero/vm/stack_zero.inline.hpp: * Copyright 2003-2007 Sun
>> Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
>> src/cpu/zero/vm/stack_zero.inline.hpp: * Please contact Sun
>> Microsystems, Inc., 4150 Network Circle, Santa Clara,
>>
>
> Thanks for the heads up; I'll clean this up before I tag the repo.
>
> -Joe
>
Thanks. Sorry for not catching these on their way in.
--
Andrew :-)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net
PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
More information about the jdk6-dev
mailing list