Backporting changeset from 7 to 6 for bugfix
Joe Darcy
joe.darcy at oracle.com
Fri Jun 18 01:42:55 PDT 2010
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 17 June 2010 17:38, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> On 17 June 2010 10:20, Andrew John Hughes <ahughes at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 17 June 2010 09:41, Andrew John Hughes <ahughes at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 17 June 2010 09:02, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 17 June 2010 00:59, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 16 June 2010 01:54, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 15 June 2010 16:30, Andrew John Hughes <ahughes at redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15 June 2010 13:21, Andrew John Hughes <ahughes at redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 15 June 2010 01:10, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Darcy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11 June 2010 05:31, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe Darcy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 June 2010 02:02, Joe Darcy <joe.darcy at oracle.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew Su wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changeset: 2208:0137b5857c63
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parent: 2183:90248595ec35
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user: okutsu
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> date: Wed Mar 10 14:32:47 2010 +0900
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> summary: 6932473: (tz) javazic produces incorrect
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SimpleTimeZone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parameters with Sun<=7
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do these look ok?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes; also approved to go back.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since some Sun copyrighted files have leaked back in, we'll
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass to clean up any such files before b20 goes final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think only a few more changes are needed to wrap up b20:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * The various backports identified in the earlier message in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Backport of 6957375 "java/net/ResponseCache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getResponseCode
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ResponseCacheTest fail after rebranding"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see this come in while I was backporting; had to merge.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * One more pass of the Sun -> Oracle copyright script
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are some new Zero bugfixes that could be backported for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b20
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would allow us to drop the local copy in IcedTea6).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've CCed Gary Benson who should be able to provide a list of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IDs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for backport.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that, we should be good to go with b20.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Being able to drop the copy of Zero in IcedTea sounds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worthwhile.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looking over the bugids and a webrev, I'd expect to approve
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going back.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Zero fixes are the last currently planned fixes for b20.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to get b20 wrapped up in the next day or two; please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the Zeros bug and I webrev so I can look them over.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for a response from Gary with the bug IDs, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>> looks
>>>>>>>>>>>>> like one isn't forthcoming. I'll compile a list from recent
>>>>>>>>>>>>> OpenJDK7
>>>>>>>>>>>>> build drops and post that shortly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2010-June/001750.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>> which causes build breakage with IcedTea.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Free Java Software Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Support Free Java!
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://openjdk.java.net
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> b87
>>>>>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6934089 Zero 32-bit/64kb page fix
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/da06d1795d84
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> b90
>>>>>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6939180 Zero locking fix
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/747d26efc5fa
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> b92
>>>>>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6941224: Improved stack overflow handling for Zero
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/f9271ff9d324
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6944503: Improved Zero crash dump
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/c544d979f886
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6944473: 6941224 misses new files
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/aa9c266de52a
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> These are hs18 Zero fixes. hs18 also includes 6944028 "6940701
>>>>>>>>>> broke
>>>>>>>>>> Zero,"
>>>>>>>>>> but that fix is not needed in OpenJDK 6 yet since we don't have the
>>>>>>>>>> fix
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> 6940701 from hs18, as you note below.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Approved to go back.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> b94
>>>>>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6939182: Zero JNI handles fix
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/0c5b3cf3c1f5
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6950178: Zero stack improvements
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/348346af6676
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6950617: Zero/Shark interface updates
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/6cfbdb113e52
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6951784: Zero deoptimizer changes
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/22af4ce8dba1
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> All of these are in hs19 and are approved to go back. The bug
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 6960550 Missing semicolon in Zero
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> is "fixed" in hs19, but not yet integrated. At your option, you
>>>>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>>>>> apply
>>>>>>>>>> this fix to OpenJDK 6 now too.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ok, I only looked at integrated fixes. But this fix looks simple
>>>>>>>>> enough and as you approve, I've backported it too :-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm surprised it even builds without the semi-colon but I guess
>>>>>>>>> that's
>>>>>>>>> C++ for you ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> b96
>>>>>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6951686: Using large pages on Linux prevents zero based
>>>>>>>>>>>> compressed
>>>>>>>>>>>> oops
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/79bf863697eb
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's the webrev for those:
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/zero/webrev.05/ and the
>>>>>>>>>>>> previous
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nimbus one: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/nimbus/webrev.07/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I approve the -source 6/-target 6 changes for Nimbus; I don't think
>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> wholesale change to -source 6/-target 6 is necessary.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please use 6961536 "Nimbus code using @Override break
>>>>>>>>>> OpenJDK/IcedBuild
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>> ecj" for the push.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The following were skipped due to the referenced changesets not
>>>>>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>>>>>> in OpenJDK6:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6939731: JSR 292 Zero build fix after 6934494
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6944028: 6940701 broke Zero
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6949830: 6939134 broke Zero
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6949423: remove tagged stack interpreter for Zero
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/68d6683eaef7
>>>>>>>>>>>> Depends on:
>>>>>>>>>>>> changeset: 1426:2338d41fbd81
>>>>>>>>>>>> user: twisti
>>>>>>>>>>>> date: Fri Apr 30 08:37:24 2010 -0700
>>>>>>>>>>>> summary: 6943304: remove tagged stack interpreter
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I've checked the bug database and all the Zero fixes in hs18 and
>>>>>>>>>> hs19
>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>> somehow addressed in this email thread.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Free Java Software Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Support Free Java!
>>>>>>>>>>>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://openjdk.java.net
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Scratch 6951686; the mention of 'zero' mislead me. It's not a
>>>>>>>>>>> Zero
>>>>>>>>>>> fix.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know when I can push the rest,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Good to push!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> All pushed!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the pushes!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With the integration of 6961870 "More rebranding fixes for
>>>>>>>> templates/gpl-*-header files," which I just pushed, I believe that is
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> last change for b20. I will tag the repos accordingly pending
>>>>>>>> successful
>>>>>>>> results from a round of sanity building and testing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't want to drag b20 out any longer either, but I think it's
>>>>>>> probably worth doing a final sync of HotSpot to hs17b16, which was
>>>>>>> just announced:
>>>>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2010-June/001781.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you recall, we brought in 6955813: Fix incorrect Oracle rebranding
>>>>>>> headers from 6941466 already so we now have hs17b15 + that fix. I
>>>>>>> think it would be better to have OpenJDK6 builds use a known HotSpot
>>>>>>> tag, which syncing with hs17b16 would give us. It actually only means
>>>>>>> bringing in one more real fix: 6953058: G1: A bigapp crashes with
>>>>>>> SIGSEGV in compiled code
>>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hsx17/master/rev/d53d91cb378c which
>>>>>>> sounds important.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, I suppose we can have *one* more sync with HotSpot for b20;
>>>>>> you're
>>>>>> approved to sync hs17b15 into OpenJDK 6.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks! Done.
>>>>> --
>>>>> Andrew :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Free Java Software Engineer
>>>>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>>>>>
>>>>> Support Free Java!
>>>>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
>>>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
>>>>> http://openjdk.java.net
>>>>>
>>>>> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
>>>>> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Impressively quick reply btw -- didn't you get this about 1am over there?
>>>>
>>>>
>> I keep late hours sometimes :-) (I was actually waiting for a test run on
>> the repo without the fix to complete.)
>>
>>
>>>> --
>>>> Andrew :-)
>>>>
>>>> Free Java Software Engineer
>>>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>>>>
>>>> Support Free Java!
>>>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
>>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
>>>> http://openjdk.java.net
>>>>
>>>> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
>>>> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> In comparing Zero in OpenJDK6 against the version in IcedTea, I found
>>> that a couple of Sun Microsystems copyrights have sneaked back in:
>>>
>>> src/cpu/zero/vm/stack_zero.cpp: * Copyright 2003-2007 Sun
>>> Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
>>> src/cpu/zero/vm/stack_zero.cpp: * Please contact Sun Microsystems,
>>> Inc., 4150 Network Circle, Santa Clara,
>>> src/cpu/zero/vm/stack_zero.inline.hpp: * Copyright 2003-2007 Sun
>>> Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
>>> src/cpu/zero/vm/stack_zero.inline.hpp: * Please contact Sun
>>> Microsystems, Inc., 4150 Network Circle, Santa Clara,
>>>
>>>
>> Thanks for the heads up; I'll clean this up before I tag the repo.
>>
>> -Joe
>>
>>
>
> Thanks. Sorry for not catching these on their way in.
>
OpenJDK 6 b20 is now tagged; source bundles, etc. will follow in due course.
On to b21!
-Joe
More information about the jdk6-dev
mailing list