6-open putback request: 6948909 and 6948803

Weijun Wang Weijun.Wang at Sun.COM
Fri May 21 02:29:48 PDT 2010


Hi Joe

Here are the webrevs:

   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/6948803/6-open/webrev.00/
   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/6948909/6-open/webrev.00/

They are almost identical to the fix for openjdk-7 except for one thing: In 6948803, several certificates are needed in the test. In openjdk-7, we've enhanced keytool to generate certificates, so the test there generates the certificates at runtime. In openjdk-6, we cannot do this. So I've copied certificate and keystores files into the test. The keystore is a binary file, which you might find not comfortable to include.

BTW, I don't remember I've ever pushed into the openjdk-6 repo, except for SSR ones. Does this mean I needn't do that and code changes into 6uXX workspaces will get folded into openjdk-6 periodically? Is my current work necessary?

Thanks
Max


On May 19, 2010, at 10:13 AM, Joe Darcy wrote:

> Hi Max.
> 
> Thanks for thinking of OpenJDK 6 as one release to port your fixes :-)
> 
> Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Hi Joe
>> 
>> These two bugs are just approved for 6u21 b05:
>> 
>>   6948803 (P2) CertPath validation regression caused by SHA1 replacement root and MD2 disable feature
>>  
> 
> This fix sounds okay, but please post the webrev for review.
> 
>>   6948909 (P3) Jarsigner removes MANIFEST.MF info for badly packages jar's
>>  
> 
> Since OpenJDK 6 should have inherited the fix for 6543940 from JDK 7, this regression would appear to affect OpenJDK 6 too.
> 
>> Both are regressions of a previous 6uXX release. I hereby request them to be included in openjdk-6.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Max
>>  
> 
> Please post the webrevs for this fixes.
> 
> As Andrew has already commented on to the list, the general policy (http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk6/) for OpenJDK 6 includes "As a general guideline, if a change is applicable to both JDK 7 and OpenJDK 6, the change should be made in JDK 7 no later than the change is made in OpenJDK 6" so I trust you will also be making arrangements to get these fixes into JDK 7.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Joe
> 



More information about the jdk6-dev mailing list