About time for b21?
Dr Andrew John Hughes
ahughes at redhat.com
Mon Oct 18 07:28:12 PDT 2010
On 18:04 Thu 14 Oct , Joe Darcy wrote:
> Hello.
>
> With Andrew's sync of HS19 into OpenJDK 6 and the recent batch of
> security fixes coming real soon now, I think it is about time to have
> b21. I'd hold b21 for the remaining bug fixes pushed to HS19 that are
> not quite promoted yet.
>
> Are there any other changes that should be in b21?
>
> -Joe
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2010-September/002008.html is
still awaiting review.
Two of the three suggestions on http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2010-August/001954.html
are also still pending (haven't had time to follow them up).
6678385 did go in, so 6853592 could do with also going in. See:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2010-October/010509.html
6853592: VM test nsk.regression.b4261880 fails with "X Error of failed request: BadWindow" inconsistently.
I'll post webrevs for these three if they sound ok for OpenJDK6 b21.
I was going to look at pushing the XRender/DirectX backport upstream, but I think that
could do with more soak time in IcedTea6. We'll do that in b22.
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net
PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint = F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
More information about the jdk6-dev
mailing list