Changeset issues with jdk6/jaxp and jdk6/jdk

Igor Nekrestyanov igor.nekrestyanov at oracle.com
Fri Feb 18 12:35:52 PST 2011


  How hard would be to add these 4 cases to list of exceptions for jcheck?

-igor

On 2/18/11 11:57 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> We have just discovered that a changeset made to the jdk6/jaxp 
> repository is missing a comment:
>   http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jaxp/rev/73a4d5be8649 (No bugid 
> or review information)
> The actual patch in the changeset is not the issue, but the comment of 
> the changeset is.
>
> [By the way, there is a new jaxp source bundle that is needed, which 
> is a different heads up for people
>  that cache these source drop bundles. But that is a separate issue.]
>
> This changeset should have been caught as not having a proper 
> changeset comment by
> our jcheck mechanism, but I had inadvertently turned off this check 
> with a change
> made back in b17.
>    http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jaxp/rev/33e6947318ae
> The comments=lax option should not be in these .jcheck/conf files.
> This is a problem with all the jdk6 repositories that I will rectify.
>
> In the process of fixing this .jcheck/conf file, I discovered 3 
> additional changesets in the jdk6/jdk
> repository done between 5-8 months ago that have also violated the 
> changeset comment rules:
>   http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/a25f15bfd04b   (Missing 
> "-by" after "Reviewed")
>   http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/bf87d5af4361  (Missing 
> ":" after the bugid)
>   http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/d77434402021 (Extra 
> "Fixed" and text that should be be there)
> All snuck by because I had added that comments=lax back in jdk6-b17 
> time frame.
>
> So I certainly should fix .jcheck/conf, but the question remains as to 
> what to do with these
> other changesets. The jdk6/jaxp one could be rolled back and fixed 
> easily, the jdk6/jdk ones
> are a bit older and would require rebasing all the newer changesets.
>
> I'm open to ideas here. Should we avoid repository rollbacks 
> completely? Or just rollback/fix jdk6/jaxp?
>
> -kto
>



More information about the jdk6-dev mailing list