request to fix CR 6998583 for 6 open
Kelly O'Hair
kelly.ohair at oracle.com
Tue Feb 22 17:28:34 PST 2011
On Feb 22, 2011, at 4:51 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> On 11:26 Tue 22 Feb , Joe Darcy wrote:
>>
>>> Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 00:20 Tue 22 Feb , Joe Darcy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10:17 Mon 21 Feb , Joe Darcy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Seán Coffey wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Requesting approval to push 6998583 changes to 6-open.
>>>>>>>> Already reviewed by Brad.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.6998583.6open/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>> Sean.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Approved for OpenJDK 6.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> As the security fixes are now in OpenJDK6, are we going to have a
>>>>>> release for b22? The fewer changes for such a release, the
>>>>>> better IMHO.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, the release of b22 should not be a protracted affair!
>>>>>
>>>>> Are there any additional changes which should go into b22?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I was assuming it would just be the security fixes. I have
>>>> plenty of stuff
>>>> to get in (HotSpot update, a slew of AWT stuff) but I'm holding
>>>> that for b23.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Okay; just security fixes it is for b22. I've started the
>>> promotion procedures for the current contents of the OpenJDK 6
>>> repositories.
>>>
>>> -Joe
>>>
>>
>> Thanks Joe, that's great.
>>
>
> If all goes as planned, the source bundle should be posted by this
> Friday, Feb. 25.
>
>> Prepare to be bombarded with stuff once b23 opens for commits! ;-)
>>
>> This is the current list of backport patches in IcedTea6, destined
>> for release in 1.10:
>>
>> * Backports
>> - S6800846, RH662230: Printing quality degraded with Java 6
>> compared to 5.0, index out of bounds exception.
>> - S6642612: JFileChooser's approve buttons should be the same size
>> (GTK)
>> - S6984543: Test sun/java2d/DirectX/OnScreenRenderingResizeTest
>> fails on GNOME
>> - S6997495: correction of regression test compiler/6857159/
>> Test6857159
>> - S6736649: test/closed/javax/swing/JMenuItem/6458123/
>> ManualBug6458123.java fails on Linux
>> - S6797139: JButton title is truncating for some strings
>> irrespective of preferred size.
>> - S6883341: SWAT: jdk7-b72 swat build(2009-09-17) threw exceptions
>> when running Java2D demo by clicking Paint ta
>> - S4493128: CubicCurve2D intersects method fails
>> - S4724552: CubicCurve2D.contains(Rectangle2D) returns true when
>> partially contained.
>> - S4645692: CubicCurve2D.solveCubic does not return all solutions.
>> - S4993545: NativeInLightFixer adds asynchronousity
>> - S6637796: setBounds doesn't enlarge Component
>> - S6607660: java.awt.Container.getMouseEventTargetImpl should be
>> invoked while holding the TreeLock
>> - S6607170: Focus not set by requestFocus
>> - S6616323: consider benefits of replacing a component array with
>> other collection from the awt.Container class
>> - S6682046: Mixing code does not always recalculate shapes
>> correctly when resizing components
>> - S6797195: Forward-port enhancements for hw/lw mixing from 6u12
>> to 7
>> - S6725214: D3D: forward-port the new pipeline from 6u10
>> - S6633275: Need to support shaped/translucent windows
>> - S7015232: missing copyright header in CheckZOrderChange.java
>> - S7017581: missing copyright header in test/sun/java2d/pipe/
>> RegionOps.java
>> - S6896068: SunGraphics2D exposes a reference to itself while non
>> fully initialised.
>> - S6749060: LCD AA text rendered incorrectly when destination is
>> non opaque (sw pipeline only)
>> - S6728834: D3D/OGL: LCD AA text becomes bold and blurred when
>> rendering to a non-opaque destination
>> - S6693253: Security Warning appearance requires enhancements
>> - S6779717: A Window does not show applet security warning icon on
>> X platforms
>> - S6785058: Parent don't get the focus after dialog is closed if
>> security warning is applied
>> - S6444769: java/awt/Insets/WindowWithWarningTest/
>> WindowWithWarningTest.html fails
>>
>> and that's without hs20...
> Sound like good changes to swim upstream :-)
I agree.
-kto
>
> -Joe
More information about the jdk6-dev
mailing list