request to fix CR 6998583 for 6 open

[joe.darcy at oracle.com]

On 2/25/2011 1:50 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 09:42 Fri 25 Feb     , Joe Darcy wrote:
>   
>> Joe Darcy wrote:
>>     
>>> Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>       
>>>> On 11:26 Tue 22 Feb     , Joe Darcy wrote:
>>>>  
>>>>         
>>>>> Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>    
>>>>>           
>>>>>> On 00:20 Tue 22 Feb     , Joe Darcy wrote:
>>>>>>        
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>>            
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> On 10:17 Mon 21 Feb     , Joe Darcy wrote:
>>>>>>>>                  
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>> Seán Coffey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>                        
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>> Requesting approval to push 6998583 changes to 6-open.
>>>>>>>>>> Already reviewed by Brad.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.6998583.6open/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Sean.
>>>>>>>>>>                               
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>> Approved for OpenJDK 6.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>>>>>                         
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>> As the security fixes are now in OpenJDK6, are we going to have a
>>>>>>>> release for b22?  The fewer changes for such a release, the 
>>>>>>>> better IMHO.
>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> Yes, the release of b22 should not be a protracted affair!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are there any additional changes which should go into b22?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> I was assuming it would just be the security fixes.  I have plenty 
>>>>>> of stuff
>>>>>> to get in (HotSpot update, a slew of AWT stuff) but I'm holding 
>>>>>> that for b23.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Okay; just security fixes it is for b22.  I've started the promotion 
>>>>> procedures for the current contents of the OpenJDK 6 repositories.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>     
>>>>>           
>>>> Thanks Joe, that's great.
>>>>   
>>>>         
>>> If all goes as planned, the source bundle should be posted by this 
>>> Friday, Feb. 25.
>>>
>>>       
>> All has not gone as planned; due to delays from contention for some 
>> internal resources, it looks like the b22 source bundle will go out 
>> early next week.
>>
>>     
>
> Thanks for the update.  Will it be possible to have it before Wednesday?
> We plan to release IcedTea6 1.10 then and having b22 would avoid carrying
> the security patches into the new release.
>
>   

Yes, the bundle should be available before Wednesday.

Cheers,

-Joe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/attachments/20110225/2caf56af/attachment.html