From lana.steuck at oracle.com Mon May 7 11:19:22 2012 From: lana.steuck at oracle.com (lana.steuck at oracle.com) Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 18:19:22 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk6/jdk6: Added tag jdk6-b25 for changeset 77b9c98d55ae Message-ID: <20120507181922.D6DE347194@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 6d2d73e97d26 Author: lana Date: 2012-05-07 11:17 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/rev/6d2d73e97d26 Added tag jdk6-b25 for changeset 77b9c98d55ae ! .hgtags From lana.steuck at oracle.com Mon May 7 11:19:22 2012 From: lana.steuck at oracle.com (lana.steuck at oracle.com) Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 18:19:22 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk6/jdk6/jaxws: Added tag jdk6-b25 for changeset 43339a3b983c Message-ID: <20120507181922.DF25847195@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 616f2ab918a8 Author: lana Date: 2012-05-07 11:17 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jaxws/rev/616f2ab918a8 Added tag jdk6-b25 for changeset 43339a3b983c ! .hgtags From lana.steuck at oracle.com Mon May 7 11:19:22 2012 From: lana.steuck at oracle.com (lana.steuck at oracle.com) Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 18:19:22 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk6/jdk6/jaxp: Added tag jdk6-b25 for changeset 1d68ba9918a0 Message-ID: <20120507181922.E274B47196@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 6f6cc8fb8e6e Author: lana Date: 2012-05-07 11:17 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jaxp/rev/6f6cc8fb8e6e Added tag jdk6-b25 for changeset 1d68ba9918a0 ! .hgtags From lana.steuck at oracle.com Mon May 7 11:19:26 2012 From: lana.steuck at oracle.com (lana.steuck at oracle.com) Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 18:19:26 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk6/jdk6/corba: Added tag jdk6-b25 for changeset 1398da813814 Message-ID: <20120507181928.4C8FC47197@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 2c6c90dae167 Author: lana Date: 2012-05-07 11:17 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/corba/rev/2c6c90dae167 Added tag jdk6-b25 for changeset 1398da813814 ! .hgtags From lana.steuck at oracle.com Mon May 7 11:19:25 2012 From: lana.steuck at oracle.com (lana.steuck at oracle.com) Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 18:19:25 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk6/jdk6/langtools: Added tag jdk6-b25 for changeset 6fa1f24a215a Message-ID: <20120507181929.30A9447198@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 2ee36350cd74 Author: lana Date: 2012-05-07 11:17 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/langtools/rev/2ee36350cd74 Added tag jdk6-b25 for changeset 6fa1f24a215a ! .hgtags From lana.steuck at oracle.com Mon May 7 11:19:25 2012 From: lana.steuck at oracle.com (lana.steuck at oracle.com) Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 18:19:25 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk6/jdk6/hotspot: Added tag jdk6-b25 for changeset fe14c1d82da5 Message-ID: <20120507181929.5944747199@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: c1fc713e41d8 Author: lana Date: 2012-05-07 11:17 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/hotspot/rev/c1fc713e41d8 Added tag jdk6-b25 for changeset fe14c1d82da5 ! .hgtags From lana.steuck at oracle.com Mon May 7 11:19:23 2012 From: lana.steuck at oracle.com (lana.steuck at oracle.com) Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 18:19:23 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk6/jdk6/jdk: Added tag jdk6-b25 for changeset 69fbcc78346e Message-ID: <20120507181943.8F2294719A@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 7634c063db13 Author: lana Date: 2012-05-07 11:18 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/7634c063db13 Added tag jdk6-b25 for changeset 69fbcc78346e ! .hgtags From lana.steuck at oracle.com Wed May 9 17:36:41 2012 From: lana.steuck at oracle.com (Lana Steuck) Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 17:36:41 -0700 Subject: OpenJDK 6 B25 Available Message-ID: <4FAB0D99.6080100@oracle.com> On May 7, 2011 the source bundle for OpenJDK 6 b25 was published at http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk6/. For more information, please refer to the following blog post: http://blogs.oracle.com/openjdk6releases/entry/openjdk_6_b25_available Special thanks to Kelly O'Hair for his contributions to the project and Dave Katleman for his Release Engineering work. Regards, Lana From dbhole at redhat.com Thu May 10 08:33:30 2012 From: dbhole at redhat.com (Deepak Bhole) Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 11:33:30 -0400 Subject: OpenJDK 6 B25 Available In-Reply-To: <4FAB0D99.6080100@oracle.com> References: <4FAB0D99.6080100@oracle.com> Message-ID: <20120510153330.GC32485@redhat.com> * Lana Steuck [2012-05-09 20:53]: > On May 7, 2011 the source bundle for OpenJDK 6 b25 was published at > http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk6/. > > For more information, please refer to the following blog post: > http://blogs.oracle.com/openjdk6releases/entry/openjdk_6_b25_available > > Special thanks to Kelly O'Hair for his contributions to the project > and Dave Katleman for his Release Engineering work. > Thanks Lana, Kelly, Dave -- and everyone else who made this release happen! Cheers, Deepak > > > From ahughes at redhat.com Fri May 11 03:41:05 2012 From: ahughes at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes) Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 06:41:05 -0400 (EDT) Subject: OpenJDK 6 B25 Available In-Reply-To: <20120510153330.GC32485@redhat.com> Message-ID: ----- Original Message ----- > * Lana Steuck [2012-05-09 20:53]: > > On May 7, 2011 the source bundle for OpenJDK 6 b25 was published at > > http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk6/. > > > > For more information, please refer to the following blog post: > > http://blogs.oracle.com/openjdk6releases/entry/openjdk_6_b25_available > > > > Special thanks to Kelly O'Hair for his contributions to the project > > and Dave Katleman for his Release Engineering work. > > > > Thanks Lana, Kelly, Dave -- and everyone else who made this release > happen! > I'll second that. I wasn't even aware of this release until Deepak pointed it out last week. Are we still working on OpenJDK6? The last time I posted a patch it was suggested that things were winding down, so I'm a little surprised to see another release. We have a whole stack of patches still needing upstreaming if they are wanted. I see this is mainly the security updates from February. Should it really have taken this long to get those out? I think that's something we need to consider going forward. > Cheers, > Deepak > > > > > > > Thanks again, -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07 From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Fri May 11 13:17:23 2012 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (Dalibor Topic) Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 22:17:23 +0200 Subject: OpenJDK 6 B25 Available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4FAD73D3.2030106@oracle.com> On 5/11/12 12:41 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote: > I'll second that. I wasn't even aware of this release until Deepak pointed > it out last week. Lana started the promotion process in April: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2012-April/002666.html > Are we still working on OpenJDK6? The last time I posted > a patch it was suggested that things were winding down, so I'm a little surprised > to see another release. We have a whole stack of patches still needing upstreaming > if they are wanted. I think that releases for OpenJDK 6 make sense for the CPUs until November. Xerxes mentioned some backports here: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2012-April/date.html - are those the fixes you mean? cheers, dalibor topic -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From xerxes at zafena.se Mon May 14 04:17:08 2012 From: xerxes at zafena.se (=?UTF-8?B?WGVyeGVzIFLDpW5ieQ==?=) Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 13:17:08 +0200 Subject: OpenJDK 6 B25 Available - backported patches by the icedtea team In-Reply-To: <4FAD73D3.2030106@oracle.com> References: <4FAD73D3.2030106@oracle.com> Message-ID: <4FB0E9B4.9040701@zafena.se> 2012-05-11 22:17, Dalibor Topic skrev: > On 5/11/12 12:41 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote: >> I'll second that. I wasn't even aware of this release until Deepak pointed >> it out last week. > > Lana started the promotion process in April: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2012-April/002666.html > >> Are we still working on OpenJDK6? The last time I posted >> a patch it was suggested that things were winding down, so I'm a little surprised >> to see another release. We have a whole stack of patches still needing upstreaming >> if they are wanted. > > I think that releases for OpenJDK 6 make sense for the CPUs until November. Xerxes > mentioned some backports here: > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2012-April/date.html - are those the > fixes you mean? No those two new patches are still not merged into IcedTea and under bug triage, I brought them up for discussion to hopefully solve the two most frequent crashing bugs reported in to the IcedTea team. The following two icedtea bugs indicate something odd in OpenJDK 6 synchronizer.cpp that look similar to the http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2012-April/002669.html - JVM crashes when heavyweight monitors are used > # Internal Error (synchronizer.cpp:1401), pid=1232, tid=1455453296 > # guarantee(mid->header()->is_neutral()) failed: invariant http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=887 - The bug for minecraft server on linux http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=904 - unhandled signal 11 : os_linux_zero.cpp:236 And the following bugs indicate something odd in OpenJDK 6 that looks similar to http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2012-April/002670.html - arraycopy stubs place prebarriers incorrectly http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=874 I think Andrew Huges was refering to the following large set of backports currently in use in IcedTea 6 builds: These 100+ patches are all backports from the OpenJDK 7/8 hg trees to OpenJDK 6. http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/icedtea6/file/6ae19889a9e0/patches/openjdk It would be really nice if all of these patches would be applied to OpenJDK 6 directly. The IcedTea project also host a large set of new patches for OpenJDK 6 that are in various state of upstreaming progress: http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/IcedTea_JDK6_Patches When we manage to upstream one of these new patches then we quickly add a new backport to the IcedTea6 patch folders, patches/openjdk , based on the upstream reviewed OpenJDK 7 and 8 commit. Cheers Xerxes From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri May 25 04:39:18 2012 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Se=E1n_Coffey?=) Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 12:39:18 +0100 Subject: CR 7071826 - code review & push request Message-ID: <4FBF6F66.1060406@oracle.com> this is a port of jdk7u fix to the openjdk6 repo. webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.7071826.jdk6/ 7u discussion/review thread : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2012-May/002990.html regards, Sean. From kelly.ohair at oracle.com Fri May 25 10:30:43 2012 From: kelly.ohair at oracle.com (Kelly O'Hair) Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 10:30:43 -0700 Subject: CR 7071826 - code review & push request In-Reply-To: <4FBF6F66.1060406@oracle.com> References: <4FBF6F66.1060406@oracle.com> Message-ID: <6E4A0011-2989-4810-889F-8D71E3B42C2D@oracle.com> Approved. -kto On May 25, 2012, at 4:39 AM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > this is a port of jdk7u fix to the openjdk6 repo. > > webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.7071826.jdk6/ > 7u discussion/review thread : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2012-May/002990.html > > regards, > Sean. From sean.coffey at oracle.com Fri May 25 12:00:13 2012 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (sean.coffey at oracle.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 19:00:13 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk6/jdk6/jdk: 7071826: Avoid benign race condition in initialization of UUID Message-ID: <20120525190021.1FFC947521@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 563d392b3e5c Author: mduigou Date: 2012-05-25 20:02 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/563d392b3e5c 7071826: Avoid benign race condition in initialization of UUID Summary: Avoids mostly benign but sometimes expensive race condition on initialization of UUID.numberGenerator which is used by UUID.randomUUID() Reviewed-by: alanb, chegar ! src/share/classes/java/util/UUID.java ! test/java/util/UUID/UUIDTest.java From ahughes at redhat.com Wed May 30 08:50:54 2012 From: ahughes at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes) Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 11:50:54 -0400 (EDT) Subject: OpenJDK 6 B25 Available - backported patches by the icedtea team In-Reply-To: <4FB0E9B4.9040701@zafena.se> Message-ID: <2125c1e7-f844-4b5a-aebb-b282825e4c81@zmail17.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> ----- Original Message ----- > 2012-05-11 22:17, Dalibor Topic skrev: > > On 5/11/12 12:41 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote: > >> I'll second that. I wasn't even aware of this release until > >> Deepak pointed > >> it out last week. > > > > Lana started the promotion process in April: > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2012-April/002666.html > > > >> Are we still working on OpenJDK6? The last time I posted > >> a patch it was suggested that things were winding down, so I'm a > >> little surprised > >> to see another release. We have a whole stack of patches still > >> needing upstreaming > >> if they are wanted. > > > > I think that releases for OpenJDK 6 make sense for the CPUs until > > November. Xerxes > > mentioned some backports here: > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2012-April/date.html > > - are those the > > fixes you mean? > > No those two new patches are still not merged into IcedTea and under > bug triage, > I brought them up for discussion to hopefully solve the two most > frequent crashing bugs reported in to the IcedTea team. > Why are they not at least in IcedTea? > The following two icedtea bugs indicate something odd in OpenJDK 6 > synchronizer.cpp that look similar to the > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2012-April/002669.html > - JVM crashes when heavyweight monitors are used > > # Internal Error (synchronizer.cpp:1401), pid=1232, tid=1455453296 > > # guarantee(mid->header()->is_neutral()) failed: invariant > http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=887 - The bug > for minecraft server on linux > http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=904 - unhandled > signal 11 : os_linux_zero.cpp:236 > > And the following bugs indicate something odd in OpenJDK 6 that looks > similar to > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2012-April/002670.html > - arraycopy stubs place prebarriers incorrectly > http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=874 > > I think Andrew Huges was refering to the following large set of > backports currently in use in IcedTea 6 builds: > These 100+ patches are all backports from the OpenJDK 7/8 hg trees to > OpenJDK 6. > http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/icedtea6/file/6ae19889a9e0/patches/openjdk > It would be really nice if all of these patches would be applied to > OpenJDK 6 directly. Yes, that's what I was referring to. Over a hundred straight backports, plus some other patches that need to take the full 8->7->6 route. Sorry for the delayed reply. It turns out I wasn't filtering jdk6-dev specifically and it got lost in all the other OpenJDK traffic. > > The IcedTea project also host a large set of new patches for OpenJDK > 6 that are in various state of upstreaming progress: > http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/IcedTea_JDK6_Patches > When we manage to upstream one of these new patches then we quickly > add a new backport to the IcedTea6 patch folders, > patches/openjdk , based on the upstream reviewed OpenJDK 7 and 8 > commit. > > Cheers > Xerxes > > -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07 From ahughes at redhat.com Wed May 30 08:53:45 2012 From: ahughes at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes) Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 11:53:45 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Oracle's plans to contribute to OpenJDK 6 after November 2012 In-Reply-To: <4F9B1042.1010803@oracle.com> Message-ID: ----- Original Message ----- > Hi, > > back at FOSDEM I received a couple of questions about OpenJDK 6 > future after the November > 2012 date, with regard to Oracle's planned contributions to it. Tomas > Nilsson, Oracle's > outbound Principal Product Manager for Java SE let JUG leaders and > Java champions > know [0] today that > > "[..] in line with no longer posting updates of Java SE 6 after > November 2012 to Oracle?s > public download sites, we don?t have plans to contribute further > changes to OpenJDK 6 after > November 2012. Users of OpenJDK 6 should consider upgrading to > OpenJDK 7, or, of course, > to Oracle JDK 7, depending on their requirements." > Ok, so what does this mean for everyone else? Most of the backports to 6 have been performed by others (e.g. Red Hat) and then approved by Oracle in the past. But Oracle have always been the only ones to approve patches and make releases. In other words, does this also mean Oracle won't approve changes by others or make releases, or just that they won't contribute changes? If so, can someone else take over this role? > cheers, > dalibor topic > > [0] http://markmail.org/thread/vkk7idimoin3z2ag > -- > Oracle > Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 > > Oracle Java Platform Group > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamburg > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz > > Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher > > Green Oracle Oracle is committed > to developing practices and products that help protect the > environment > -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07 From ahughes at redhat.com Wed May 30 10:54:27 2012 From: ahughes at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes) Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 13:54:27 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [BACKPORT] 6610244: modal dialog closes with fatal error if -Xcheck:jni is set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Hi, This is a request to backport the fix for 6612044. It's been in jdk7 since March 25th, 2008: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/jdk/rev/58c90502785d and according to: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6610244 it went into the proprietary 6u14 update. This is required for the backport of 6769607 and has been in IcedTea since 2011-06-09. Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/openjdk6/6610244/webrev.01/ Ok for backport to jdk6? -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07 From kelly.ohair at oracle.com Wed May 30 13:51:34 2012 From: kelly.ohair at oracle.com (Kelly O'Hair) Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 13:51:34 -0700 Subject: [BACKPORT] 6610244: modal dialog closes with fatal error if -Xcheck:jni is set In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5434126E-DF7D-4940-BB80-3F44AEDCDC61@oracle.com> Approved. -kto On May 30, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote: > Hi, > > This is a request to backport the fix for 6612044. > > It's been in jdk7 since March 25th, 2008: > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/jdk/rev/58c90502785d > > and according to: > > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6610244 > > it went into the proprietary 6u14 update. > > This is required for the backport of 6769607 and has been > in IcedTea since 2011-06-09. > > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/openjdk6/6610244/webrev.01/ > > Ok for backport to jdk6? > -- > Andrew :) > > Free Java Software Engineer > Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) > > PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) > Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07 > From ahughes at redhat.com Thu May 31 06:51:13 2012 From: ahughes at redhat.com (ahughes at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 13:51:13 +0000 Subject: hg: jdk6/jdk6/jdk: 6610244: modal dialog closes with fatal error if -Xcheck:jni is set Message-ID: <20120531135138.5ECB547649@hg.openjdk.java.net> Changeset: 9375a7661584 Author: dav Date: 2008-03-25 15:16 +0300 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/jdk/rev/9375a7661584 6610244: modal dialog closes with fatal error if -Xcheck:jni is set Summary: obtain WWindowPeer class every time it is required Reviewed-by: art ! src/windows/native/sun/windows/awt_Dialog.cpp ! src/windows/native/sun/windows/awt_Window.cpp ! src/windows/native/sun/windows/awt_Window.h + test/java/awt/Dialog/CrashXCheckJni/CrashXCheckJni.java From Mike.Duigou at oracle.com Fri May 25 10:37:34 2012 From: Mike.Duigou at oracle.com (Mike Duigou) Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 10:37:34 -0700 Subject: CR 7071826 - code review & push request In-Reply-To: <4FBF6F66.1060406@oracle.com> References: <4FBF6F66.1060406@oracle.com> Message-ID: <4662402E-2321-41EB-B2A6-BD7C997ABA6B@oracle.com> Looks good On May 25 2012, at 04:39 , Se?n Coffey wrote: > this is a port of jdk7u fix to the openjdk6 repo. > > webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.7071826.jdk6/ > 7u discussion/review thread : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2012-May/002990.html > > regards, > Sean.