The future of OpenJDK6
Andrew Haley
aph at redhat.com
Thu Mar 14 02:18:21 PDT 2013
On 03/13/2013 09:14 PM, Alex Kasko wrote:
> On 03/13/2013 09:02 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>
>> OpenJDK 6 is a legacy project. People only use it because they want
>> long-term stability and compatibility. Therefore, only changes that
>> fix significant bugs should be made. This is not a policy change from
>> that discussed on http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk6/
>
> Question about two features, that are not bugfixes, but may be useful in
> jdk6:
>
> 1) unlimited crypto support:
> - makefile patch from jdk7 [1]
> - maillist thread [2]
>
> 2) missed copyMemory method in sun.misc.Unsafe:
> - maillist thread [3]
> - patch that I'm using in my local jdk6 builds [4]
> - original patch that removed proper copyMemory method [5]
>
> Are there any chances for them to be included into jdk6?
I would strongly prefer it if neither of these patches went in, but I
am open to argument.
Almost nothing would persuade me to accept 2). This is an internal
method that no application should use.
Andrew.
More information about the jdk6-dev
mailing list