Review request for OPENJDK6-40: OpenJDK6-b32 does not compile the testcase that Oracle JDK 6u45 compiles fine

Nikolay Gorshkov nikolay at azulsystems.com
Thu Dec 11 18:59:25 UTC 2014


Hi Andrew,

Me and my colleagues have a consensus that the patch is important to us -
we are responsible for introducing a regression into OpenJDK 6 (breaking
Apache Flume 1.5.0 compilation), and so we have to fix it. We have already
included this patch into our OpenJDK 6 -based products, and now we are
interested in upstreaming it to OpenJDK 6 itself to minimize the difference
in codebase.

Thanks,
Nikolay

On 10.12.2014 19:56, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 12/10/2014 04:32 PM, Nikolay Gorshkov wrote:
>> I see your point that we chose a risky way and remember discussions
>> around
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2010-December/002195.html
>> that we had in the past when the fix for OPENJDK6-35 was in review.
>>
>> Well, my opinion is that this risk was taken when we decided to integrate
>> OPENJDK6-35. Unfortunately, we have consequences, and now we need to deal
>> with them. Luckily, the problem is known and resolved by a simple fix.
>> We have verified it by all available means and currently are not aware of
>> any other regressions. In my opinion, this approach (moving forward, fixing
>> regressions) is more preferable than moving to pre- JDK-6650759 state where
>> we had known incompatibilities.
>
> I admit that you're probably right, but I still need an answer to my
> question about how important this patch is.
>
> Andrew.
>
>


More information about the jdk6-dev mailing list