Review request for OPENJDK6-32: OpenJDK6-b31 isn't compatible with Windows platform
Andrew Hughes
gnu.andrew at redhat.com
Fri May 30 14:26:35 UTC 2014
----- Original Message -----
> Hello Andrew,
>
>
> sorry for the late reply.
>
> This header was suggested by our legal, so I’m just following the rules here.
>
I had a feeling it would be something like that. Thanks for clarifying.
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> - Vlad
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Andrew Hughes
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 18:52
> To: karnaukhovv at gmail.com
> Cc: jdk6-dev at openjdk.java.net
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > please review the fix for OPENJDK6-32: OpenJDK6-b31 isn't compatible with
> > Windows platform
> >
> > webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vkarnauk/OPENJDK6-32/webrev.00/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This fix is a follow-up to threads [1], [2], and [3]. It contains changes
> > necessary to upgrade compilers to VisualStudio 2010, as well as changes
> > that
> > fix current issues in Windows part of OpenJDK6-b31.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [1]
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2014-February/003228.html
> >
> > [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2014-April/003270.html
> >
> > [3] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2014-May/003288.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > - Vlad
>
> There doesn't seem to be anything in there that will affect the GNU/Linux
> build.
>
> Does the licensing addition need to be so verbose? Would not a simple
> copyright line
> suffice? In some cases, it's larger than the actual code additions.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Andrew :)
>
> Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>
> PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
> Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
More information about the jdk6-dev
mailing list