JDK7 Feature schedule: SCTP

[Mark Warren]

I agree that we should try to get this into MS 3.

Mark W.

Vita Santrucek wrote:
>
> Chris, Mark,
>
>>>> but I would like to hold off on integration into the JDK 7 master to
>>>> accommodate the SQE sc
>
>
> To my knowledge there are no scheduling problems on the SQE side. 
> Chris, can you clarify?
>
>>> Vita, other Release Team members: What do you think?
>
>
> In order to keep the preview release compelling and get more exposure 
> to the new code, I'd prefer to have this feature in now (waiving some 
> individual milestone exit criteria if necessary) rather than postpone 
> integration until future milestones.
>
> Let me check with Shantaram tonight, but unless there are some newly 
> developed blockers I'd say let's get it in M3.
>
> Vita
>
>
> On Apr 6, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
>
>> On 04/06/09 04:52 PM, Mark Reinhold wrote:
>>>> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:01:15 +0100
>>>> From: christopher.hegarty at sun.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> The JDK7 feature SCTP [1] is currently targeted to Milestone 3, see 
>>>> the
>>>> JDK 7 development schedule [2]. I would like to re-target this feature
>>>> to M5.
>>>>
>>>> Development is progressing nicely through the SCTP OpenJDK project 
>>>> [3],
>>>> but I would like to hold off on integration into the JDK 7 master to
>>>> accommodate the SQE schedule,
>>>>
>>>
>>> Which aspect of the SQE schedule do you mean?  The SQE testing cycle is
>>> aligned with the milestone schedule.
>>>
>>> If you can't make build 55, can you make build 56?  Given the relative
>>> independence of the SCTP API from the rest of the code base I'd be open
>>> to it being integrated somewhat later in M3.
>>>
>>> Vita, other Release Team members: What do you think?
>>>
>>> - Mark
>>>
>>
>> I'm open to letting this feature in a later m3 build; I'd prefer that 
>> to m5.
>>
>> -Joe
>>
>