THIRD_PARTY_README mangled

Martin Buchholz martinrb at google.com
Mon Aug 17 14:12:45 PDT 2009


Checking the jdk7 MASTER, I see that
there are two flavors of THIRD_PARTY_README
that should probably be un-forked.

 $ find -name THIRD_PARTY_README | xargs sum
27722   125 ./THIRD_PARTY_README
61624   125 ./jaxws/THIRD_PARTY_README
27722   125 ./langtools/THIRD_PARTY_README
61624   125 ./jaxp/THIRD_PARTY_README
61624   125 ./jdk/THIRD_PARTY_README
27722   125 ./hotspot/THIRD_PARTY_README
61624   125 ./build/linux-amd64/j2re-image/THIRD_PARTY_README
61624   125 ./build/linux-amd64/j2sdk-image/THIRD_PARTY_README
61624   125 ./build/linux-amd64/j2sdk-image/jre/THIRD_PARTY_README
27722   125 ./corba/THIRD_PARTY_README

It appears that some licenses are correctly included verbatim,
and some are gratuitously reformatted.

Martin

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:50, Brad Wetmore<Bradford.Wetmore at sun.com> wrote:
> I've got to look into this for something unrelated.  Thanks for letting us
> know.  I'll have a look.
>
> Are you looking at the new one from 6803688 in TL/MASTER?  Or something
> else?

All the THIRD_PARTY_READMEs should be the same in all the repos, right?
Anyways, the latest TL/jdk/THIRD_PARTY_README

> Brad
>
>
> Martin Buchholz wrote:
>>
>> The THIRD_PARTY_README contains a list of licenses.
>> It should include the license texts verbatim, byte-for-byte,
>> when those licenses are available in plain text form,
>> as they invariably are.
>>
>> But in fact the license text appears to be mangled,
>> as if someone had copied and pasted the various license
>> text into a buggy Windows word processor and re-exported to text.
>>
>> Martin
>



More information about the jdk7-dev mailing list