Suggestions for Java Generics Semantics in Java Version 7.0 _ Resurrected

[Dalibor Topic]

Kirill Grouchnikov wrote:
> The usage of words "valuable" and "evidently" is very subjective in this context, since i haven't seen any evidence of true community feedback, or any sign of a transparent decision / development process in JDK 7.
>

I think that it's pretty self-evident that the JDK 7 development 
process is a lot more transparent then any previous JDK's before.
This discussion wouldn't have been possible in the bad old days.

In the interest of a making the development process more transparent, 
are there any specific things you're working on for OpenJDK 7 yourself, 
or are you just an interested lurker? Nothing wrong with the latter,
but it tends to be easier to understand development one's actively 
engaged in.

cheers,
dalibor topic
--
*******************************************************************
Dalibor Topic                   Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738
Java F/OSS Ambassador           AIM: robiladonaim
Sun Microsystems GmbH           Mobile: (+49 177) 2664 192
Nagelsweg 55                    http://openjdk.java.net
D-20097 Hamburg                 mailto:Dalibor.Topic at sun.com
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Amtsgericht München: HRB 161028
Geschäftsführer: Thomas Schröder, Wolfgang Engels, Wolf Frenkel
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Häring