RFR (XXS): 7130404: [macosx] "os.arch" value should be "x86_64" for compatibility with Apple JDK6
James Melvin
james.melvin at oracle.com
Wed Feb 22 15:10:05 PST 2012
Updated to include latest comments...
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jmelvin/7130404/hotspot/webrev.02
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jmelvin/7130404/jdk/webrev.02
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jmelvin/7130404/corba/webrev.01
Changed...
hotspot:
agent/src/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/utilities/PlatformInfo.java
- refined method comment to be more appropriate
jdk:
src/share/classes/java/awt/GraphicsEnvironment.java
- revert changes based on an offline discussion with AWT
- Jim
On 2/21/12 6:08 PM, James Melvin wrote:
> Thanks for the reviews! Updated webrevs with all comments...
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jmelvin/7130404/hotspot/webrev.01
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jmelvin/7130404/jdk/webrev.01
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jmelvin/7130404/corba/webrev.01
>
> Main changes were to refine the use of string compares for Mac OS X...
>
> < osName.startsWith("Mac OS")
> > osName.contains("OS X")
>
> Any final comments? A decision has not yet been made to include this
> change or not. I'll provide an update when there's progress.
>
> - Jim
>
>
>
> On 2/20/12 4:02 PM, James Melvin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> To maintain compatibility with Apple JDKs, a proposal will be made to
>> change the 'os.arch' system property from 'amd64' to 'x86_64' on Mac OS
>> X. Minor changes are required to the following repositories, for which
>> I've provided webrevs...
>>
>> WEBREV:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jmelvin/7130404/hotspot/webrev.00
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jmelvin/7130404/jdk/webrev.00
>>
>> TESTING:
>> JPRT job (2012-02-20-203901.jmelvin.hotspot)
>> Notepad, SwingSet2, SPECjbb2005
>>
>> This change will also impact a small number of internal tests and RE
>> scripts. The bundle names will also reflect the change amd64 -> x86_64.
>> HotSpot changes can be integrated first, with the JDK changes in the
>> following promotion. Should the proposal be rejected for 7u4, I
>> obviously withdraw the bugfix.
>>
>> Feedback welcome,
>>
>> Jim
More information about the jdk7-dev
mailing list