From Xiomara.Jayasena at Sun.COM Thu Oct 2 16:14:41 2008 From: Xiomara.Jayasena at Sun.COM (Xiomara.Jayasena at Sun.COM) Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:14:41 -0700 Subject: Heads up -- jdk 7 copyright year update Message-ID: <48E555E1.5060205@Sun.COM> Hi, I plan to be updating about 500 files with copyright year update to 2008. I hope to be able to put this back to the master repositories tomorrow. -Xiomara From Erik.Trimble at Sun.COM Thu Oct 2 16:31:34 2008 From: Erik.Trimble at Sun.COM (Erik Trimble) Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:31:34 -0700 Subject: Heads up -- jdk 7 copyright year update In-Reply-To: <48E555E1.5060205@Sun.COM> References: <48E555E1.5060205@Sun.COM> Message-ID: <1222990294.19612.112.camel@ghostbox> Any chance whatsoever you can wait until AFTER I do this week's Hotspot integration (probably Tuesday morning)? Otherwise, I end up with a huge amount of conflict resolutions I have to do... On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 16:14 -0700, Xiomara.Jayasena at Sun.COM wrote: > Hi, > > I plan to be updating about 500 files with copyright year update to > 2008. I hope to be able to put this back to the master repositories > tomorrow. > > -Xiomara > > -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800) From Xiomara.Jayasena at Sun.COM Thu Oct 2 16:35:29 2008 From: Xiomara.Jayasena at Sun.COM (Xiomara.Jayasena at Sun.COM) Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:35:29 -0700 Subject: Heads up -- jdk 7 copyright year update In-Reply-To: <1222990294.19612.112.camel@ghostbox> References: <48E555E1.5060205@Sun.COM> <1222990294.19612.112.camel@ghostbox> Message-ID: <48E55AC1.5060507@Sun.COM> Changes are pretty much ready to go. -Xiomara Erik Trimble wrote: > Any chance whatsoever you can wait until AFTER I do this week's Hotspot > integration (probably Tuesday morning)? Otherwise, I end up with a huge > amount of conflict resolutions I have to do... > > > On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 16:14 -0700, Xiomara.Jayasena at Sun.COM wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I plan to be updating about 500 files with copyright year update to >> 2008. I hope to be able to put this back to the master repositories >> tomorrow. >> >> -Xiomara >> >> >> From Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM Thu Oct 2 16:42:10 2008 From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM (Kelly O'Hair) Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:42:10 -0700 Subject: Heads up -- jdk 7 copyright year update In-Reply-To: <1222990294.19612.112.camel@ghostbox> References: <48E555E1.5060205@Sun.COM> <1222990294.19612.112.camel@ghostbox> Message-ID: <48E55C52.1050007@sun.com> I kind of doubt this creates a major issue in merging, but I could be wrong. Files your team has not changed (e.g. non-hotspot files) won't be involved at all, and even the ones where there is a conflict should automatically resolve, by hgmerge or by filemerge, depending on the merge tool you are using. I guess, what I'm saying is that if this kind of change does create a major effort on your part, I'd like to understand why so we can address it. -kto Erik Trimble wrote: > Any chance whatsoever you can wait until AFTER I do this week's Hotspot > integration (probably Tuesday morning)? Otherwise, I end up with a huge > amount of conflict resolutions I have to do... > > > On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 16:14 -0700, Xiomara.Jayasena at Sun.COM wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I plan to be updating about 500 files with copyright year update to >> 2008. I hope to be able to put this back to the master repositories >> tomorrow. >> >> -Xiomara >> >> From Erik.Trimble at Sun.COM Thu Oct 2 16:47:18 2008 From: Erik.Trimble at Sun.COM (Erik Trimble) Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:47:18 -0700 Subject: Heads up -- jdk 7 copyright year update In-Reply-To: <48E55C52.1050007@sun.com> References: <48E555E1.5060205@Sun.COM> <1222990294.19612.112.camel@ghostbox> <48E55C52.1050007@sun.com> Message-ID: <1222991238.19612.120.camel@ghostbox> Indeed, I don't see any problem with any files that aren't changed by those I'm pushing up. However, filemerge generally requires that I at least _look_ at each file before accepting the merges, and with a GUI, that can take 45 minutes or more (especially with larger pushes like this one, where I'm going to be pushing 500 or so files). Maybe I'll look at hgmerge to see if it can eliminate some my work. -Erik On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 16:42 -0700, Kelly O'Hair wrote: > I kind of doubt this creates a major issue in merging, but I could be wrong. > Files your team has not changed (e.g. non-hotspot files) won't be involved > at all, and even the ones where there is a conflict should automatically > resolve, by hgmerge or by filemerge, depending on the merge tool you are using. > > I guess, what I'm saying is that if this kind of change does create a major > effort on your part, I'd like to understand why so we can address it. > > -kto > > > Erik Trimble wrote: > > Any chance whatsoever you can wait until AFTER I do this week's Hotspot > > integration (probably Tuesday morning)? Otherwise, I end up with a huge > > amount of conflict resolutions I have to do... > > > > > > On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 16:14 -0700, Xiomara.Jayasena at Sun.COM wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I plan to be updating about 500 files with copyright year update to > >> 2008. I hope to be able to put this back to the master repositories > >> tomorrow. > >> > >> -Xiomara > >> > >> -- Erik Trimble Java System Support Mailstop: usca22-123 Phone: x17195 Santa Clara, CA Timezone: US/Pacific (GMT-0800) From Tim.Bell at Sun.COM Fri Oct 10 16:00:31 2008 From: Tim.Bell at Sun.COM (Tim Bell) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:00:31 -0700 Subject: No TL b38 master push today Message-ID: <48EFDE8F.7090704@sun.com> Hi Folks I did not get my Serviceability PIT (Pre Integration Testing) certificate today, so I will not be pushing changes into the jdk7/jdk7 master gates as originally scheduled [1]. We will be filing bug reports and resolving the issues next week. I still think we can still make it into b38. If you are interested in following the details, the conversation will be held on serviceability-dev (at) openjdk.java.net. Tim Bell jdk7/tl gatekeeper [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7/builds From Bradford.Wetmore at Sun.COM Thu Oct 16 15:15:08 2008 From: Bradford.Wetmore at Sun.COM (Brad Wetmore) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:15:08 -0700 Subject: JSN Gate is being EOL'd. Message-ID: <48F7BCEC.9020706@sun.com> As you may know, I have been the gatekeeper for the JSN (Java Security & Networking) gate for the last 4 or so years. As many of JSN and TL (Tools & Libraries) changes are interrelated, we have been combining/testing/integrating the JSN & TL changes together into the MASTER workspaces. JSN has been a "subgate" of TL for several years. I have been asked to lead a new OpenJDK infrastructure project. In order to reduce my workload, we have decided that the JSN gate will be End-Of-Life'd following next week's integration into TL on 20 Oct 2008. All developers working in the JSN gate will immediately transition to the TL gate under gatekeeper Tim Bell. I will resync the JSN workspaces one last time on Monday, but after that, all pulls/pushes should be done to TL. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl I hope to make the JSN gate READ-ONLY at that point, not sure if I can do that yet. It's with mixed feelings, I've been doing this for quite a while and have it down to an art. Brad From Tim.Bell at Sun.COM Fri Oct 17 08:30:33 2008 From: Tim.Bell at Sun.COM (Tim Bell) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:30:33 -0700 Subject: TL would like the PM integration slot for JDK7 on Friday, 17 October In-Reply-To: <48EFDE8F.7090704@sun.com> References: <48EFDE8F.7090704@sun.com> Message-ID: <48F8AF99.8020704@sun.com> I (Tim Bell) wrote: > We will be filing bug reports and resolving the issues next week. I > still think we can still make it into b38. The issues (Bug-IDs 6758616 and 6758881) are resolved and I have my PIT certificates. TL would like the PM integration slot for JDK7 on Friday, 17 October. Thanks - Tim From Xiomara.Jayasena at Sun.COM Fri Oct 17 09:22:32 2008 From: Xiomara.Jayasena at Sun.COM (Xiomara Jayasena) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:22:32 -0700 Subject: TL would like the PM integration slot for JDK7 on Friday, 17 October In-Reply-To: <48F8AF99.8020704@sun.com> References: <48EFDE8F.7090704@sun.com> <48F8AF99.8020704@sun.com> Message-ID: <48F8BBC8.7090604@sun.com> Hi Tim, Tim Bell wrote: > I (Tim Bell) wrote: > >> We will be filing bug reports and resolving the issues next week. I >> still think we can still make it into b38. > > The issues (Bug-IDs 6758616 and 6758881) are resolved and I have my > PIT certificates. TL would like the PM integration slot for JDK7 on > Friday, 17 October. Please go ahead with the integration. -Xiomara > > Thanks - > > Tim