From Bradford.Wetmore at Sun.COM Tue Nov 3 18:43:38 2009 From: Bradford.Wetmore at Sun.COM (Brad Wetmore) Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:43:38 -0800 Subject: Boot cycle builds In-Reply-To: <4AE5E8A2.6050900@sun.com> References: <4AE5E8A2.6050900@sun.com> Message-ID: <4AF0EA5A.6080103@sun.com> > As soon as we can do a jdk7 boot cycle build again, I plan on changing > the default build to include a boot cycle build > (where the jdk7 image is built, then used as the boot jdk to build > it again). Kelly, is this just when doing full "control"/top-level builds? Not when building just the JDK repository? > It can be turned off with SKIP_BOOT_CYCLE=true, but I hope the > integrators and everyone will be careful when it is turned off. Looks like this is already in? (./Makefile) > Depending on your build situation, this could add 20-30 minutes > (maybe more) to your jdk7 build, which is painful I know, but > so is finding out that the jdk you just built doesn't work. If not, I'll need to adjust my security builds accordingly. Brad From Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM Wed Nov 4 08:02:27 2009 From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM (Kelly O'Hair) Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:02:27 -0800 Subject: Boot cycle builds In-Reply-To: <4AF0EA5A.6080103@sun.com> References: <4AE5E8A2.6050900@sun.com> <4AF0EA5A.6080103@sun.com> Message-ID: <4AF1A593.8060307@sun.com> Brad Wetmore wrote: >> As soon as we can do a jdk7 boot cycle build again, I plan on changing >> the default build to include a boot cycle build >> (where the jdk7 image is built, then used as the boot jdk to build >> it again). > > Kelly, is this just when doing full "control"/top-level builds? Not > when building just the JDK repository? Correct. > >> It can be turned off with SKIP_BOOT_CYCLE=true, but I hope the >> integrators and everyone will be careful when it is turned off. > > Looks like this is already in? (./Makefile) Feature is there, but the default setting is true (skips it). -kto > >> Depending on your build situation, this could add 20-30 minutes >> (maybe more) to your jdk7 build, which is painful I know, but >> so is finding out that the jdk you just built doesn't work. > > If not, I'll need to adjust my security builds accordingly. > > Brad > From mr at sun.com Fri Nov 6 21:01:39 2009 From: mr at sun.com (Mark Reinhold) Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:01:39 -0800 Subject: JDK 7 M5 extended to build 76 (2009/11/12) In-Reply-To: lana.steuck@sun.com; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:18:57 PST; <4AF4BCF1.8030702@sun.com> Message-ID: <20091107050139.9597027F@eggemoggin.niobe.net> (cc'ing jdk7-gk to make sure everyone's on the same page) > Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:18:57 -0800 > From: lana.steuck at sun.com Hey -- welcome back! > According to Jdk7 build calendar, b76 promotion date was last Thu, 11/05, while > in your email it is on 11/12. > > ... > > Please note that the calendar shows that some builds take two weeks, while > others only one week. Is this by intention? No, it's by lack of time -- I just haven't yet had time to update the calendar. I'll do that soon. > I was planning to integrate a number of client fixes (awt, swing and 2d) into > b77 (Swing has a slot on Wed, Nov 11). > > I saw your email about M5 being extended to b76, however missed that "your" :) > b76 is on Nov 12. (was looking at the calendar page which says b76 is on Nov > 05). > > Should I hold off the Client integration till after Nov 12? > Or can I integrate them on Nov 11? I assume that then they would get into M5 > (any approvals required?) No, the last changes for M5 are already in the master, to soak for a bit until we promote b76 next Thursday 11/12. Please wait until after Thursday to do your next integration, which will be for M6. - Mark From Tim.Bell at Sun.COM Sat Nov 7 17:53:20 2009 From: Tim.Bell at Sun.COM (Tim Bell) Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:53:20 -0800 Subject: jdk7-b76: JSN, Tools, Core Libraries, and Serviceability In-Reply-To: <4AF5B7CF.3060500@sun.com> References: <4AF5B7CF.3060500@sun.com> Message-ID: <4AF62490.5070703@sun.com> I (Tim Bell) wrote: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/corba/rev/0fb137085952 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/rev/d8dd291a362a > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/jaxp/rev/2f83acf616a7 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/jaxws/rev/cc35f0e129d2 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/jdk/rev/e046a2002310 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/langtools/rev/a491ad1bb624 > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/rev/d1516b9f2395 > > --- > > PIT waived by Java Quality Engineering (SQE) Thanks to Martin, who pointed out that my push was incomplete. I don't know what happened - attempting repairs now. Tim From Tim.Bell at Sun.COM Mon Nov 23 16:14:56 2009 From: Tim.Bell at Sun.COM (Tim Bell) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:14:56 -0800 Subject: I'd like to push the TL b77 integration at 17:00 PST today (Monday) Message-ID: <4B0B2580.7070404@sun.com> We got the PIT waivers I did not have in time to push on Friday. Please let me know before 17:00 PST if you were planning to use the PM slot today. Thank you- Tim Bell