Request for push: 7062969
Kumar Srinivasan
kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.COM
Thu Aug 4 07:58:59 PDT 2011
Hi Roger,
>
> The bug is visible:
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7062969
> It was likely not visible yesterday and was made visible in this
> mornings bugs.sun.com update.
>
> There was a problem with the update process between bugs.sun.com and
> Bugtraq over the weekend and a number of bugs were removed. Since then
> nightly process has been catching up and most of the bugs that were
> removed are now visible once again. The rest should be take care of
> early tomorrow morning. 7062969 had been visible up until Saturday and
> then as affected by the update problem.
>
> Also, one thing to take in mind is that the search engine can take 1
> -2 days to spider bugs.sun.com. So if you have the bug ID, it is best
> to enter the ID in the URL
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=<BUGID> or you can
> go to bugs.sun.com and enter the ID in the 'Bug ID' field.
Thanks Roger, Jim Holmlund and I were wondering about this yesterday.
Kumar
>
> Thank you,
> Roger
>
>
> On 8/4/11 7:26 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Request push approval for CR: 7062969
>> For some reason this does not appear on bugs.sun.com, so here is the
>> description:
>>
>> Description:
>> Java version:
>> 1.7.0-b146
>>
>> Problems:
>> In the command line, if you do "java -help", you will see:
>> "See http://java.sun.com/javase/reference for more details." at the
>> end of the output.
>>
>> Should that sun.com be changed into Oracle.com?
>> It already redirects http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/index.html
>> but I think if the javadoc or java -help should also show above url
>> as well in the command.
>>
>> File this bug to make sure the mentioned Sun.com url is changed to
>> Oracle.com
>>
>>
>> The webrev can be found here:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/7062969/webrev/
>>
>> The changeset can be found here:
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/c0c983ca797b
>>
>> The review was dicussed/reviewed on corelibs-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> The patch is identical to the jdk8 changeset.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Kumar
>>
>>
More information about the jdk7u-dev
mailing list