webrevs.2 for macosx changes to jdk7u-osx

[David Holmes]

On 2/12/2011 4:56 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> Where is the Mercurial URL for jdk7u-osx ?

Same place as all the other repos :)

http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-osx/

David

> 2011/12/2 David Holmes<david.holmes at oracle.com>:
>> <Added core-libs-dev to the cc list>
>>
>>
>> On 2/12/2011 11:30 AM, Paul Hohensee wrote:
>>>
>>> I agree. Be a good idea to ask for review from all the affected teams.
>>> I _think_ core libs is the only one we missed, though.
>>
>>
>> My concern is that there are a number of platform specific changes being
>> made to java.* and javax.* classes (there are changes to sun.* as well but
>> that is less of a concern).
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/7113349/4/jdk7u-osx/modified/
>>
>> I would hope that we could find a way to not have to make platform specific
>> changes to such classes, and we need to be sure that the proposed changes do
>> not impact other platforms either in terms of functionality or performance.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David
>>
>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>> On 12/1/11 8:07 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2/12/2011 7:38 AM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/1/11 6:12 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kelly,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, that is correct. This push is initially just for jdk7u-osx, which
>>>>>> is a development forest. I'm not sure exactly what the procedure
>>>>>> will be yet
>>>>>> for the push into jdk7u-dev.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no special procedure for pushing into jdk7u-osx that's
>>>>> different from
>>>>> the one for jdk7u-dev. You need to submit a bulk change request for
>>>>> approval first,
>>>>> someone (i.e. either me or Edvard) needs to approve it, then the push
>>>>> can happen
>>>>> - regardless whether that's jdk7u-dev or jdk7u-osx.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> All the osx porting work is being discussed on the macosx-port-dev
>>>> mailing list. Most core-libs subscribers will not be on that list
>>>> (including me - which means my cc to that list will either bounce or
>>>> get held up). There are proposed changes to core Java classes that
>>>> should be explicitly reviewed and approved by the core-libs folk in my
>>>> opinion.
>>>>
>>>> David