Code Review Request for MacOS X build change (7117748)

[Daniel D. Daugherty]

No conflict because it is the same changeset.
I'm just trying to make it easier to build the
jdk7u-osx forest with JPRT. Your call as to
whether you want it now or later...

Dan

On 12/6/11 8:02 AM, Paul Hohensee wrote:
> [dropped some of the cc's inadvertently]
>
> If you push directly to jdk7u-osx/hotspot, and then we pull hs23 with
> the identical fix down into it, we'll have a conflict.  Current process
> is to push up to hsx/hsx23, PIT over the weekend and push the
> following week.  In this case, that'd be next week.  So, do you
> really, really have to push this change into jdk7u-osx/hotspot
> right now?  E.g., could you publish a patch instead as Mike has done?
>
> Paul
>
> On 12/6/11 9:53 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>> Paul,
>>
>> I'd like to push this fix to the jdk7u/jdk7u-osx/hotspot repo.
>> The fix is in the JPRT-hotspotwest queue heading to RT_Baseline
>> and I have it setup so that the same changeset can also go into
>> the jdk7u/jdk7u-osx/hotspot repo.
>>
>> Do I have permission?
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> On 12/3/11 9:13 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> I have a fix that allows HSX-23 to be built on MacOS X via JPRT
>>> without specifying SA_APPLE_BOOT_JAVA or ALWAYS_PASS_TEST_GAMMA
>>> on the command line. I'm targeting this fix at RT_Baseline for
>>> the HSX-23-B08 snapshot.
>>>
>>> Here is the webrev URL:
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/7117748-webrev/0/
>>>
>>> I tested this fix with the default JPRT boot JDK (JDK6 from Apple)
>>> and with JDK7 boot JDK (JDK7 bits from Oracle).
>>>
>>> Thanks, in advance, for any reviews.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> P.S.
>>> This fix does _not_ get "gamma" working on MacOS X.
>>> That work is being done separately.
>>>