Draft Repository Management

[Jim Holmlund]

On 7/29/2011 1:46 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
> Poonam,
>
> 7u repos are best viewed from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/
>
> I've often wondered why the mercurial webserver doesn't show a sub-forest type view when using the 
> link you've mentioned.  e.g http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/jdk/ is the forest I'm using.
As I read the doc
     http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/repos.html

jdk7u/jdk7u is the master and people should not be pushing to it.  Erik said that the integration 
repo(s) to which we should push have not yet been created.  It isn't clear to me if we will have 
just one integration repo, or maybe different ones for core, client, hotspot, etc.)

- jjh

>
> The doc should be updated to avoid confusion though.
> regards,
> Sean.
>
>
> On 29/07/2011 06:56, Poonam Bajaj wrote:
>> Hi Dalibor,
>>
>> On the Repository Management page (http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/repos.html), the 
>> location of 7u integration forest is mentioned.
>>
>> "
>> *Rule 2*
>>
>> jdk7u-dev - Integration - always-open mainline forest. Integration schedule is TBD, and will be 
>> published on the Project's web page. The push rights to the integration forest are available to 
>> current JDK 7 Committers.
>>
>> The OpenJDK JDK 7 Updates integation forest is located at 
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/.
>> "
>>
>> But the location http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/ is not accessible. Is it correct or 
>> the forest has not been created yet ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Poonam
>>
>>
>> On 7/28/2011 3:23 AM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>>> On 7/13/11 5:25 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>>>> This is a draft for repository management. It describes the forests we have in the OpenJDK 
>>>> Project, what role they serve, and who gets to push code into them. The basic idea is to 
>>>> provide some transparency into repository creation, making it easy for existing JDK 7 
>>>> Committers to push approved fixes into the always open JDK 7 Update mainline, while gating push 
>>>> access to the masters a bit more carefully to ensure that they are always in a good shape.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the comments - I updated the draft to reflect them and published it on the web site.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> dalibor topic
>>>
>>>
>>