Suggestion: require release name in the approval request Subject line

Edvard Wendelin edvard.wendelin at oracle.com
Tue Nov 15 06:16:50 PST 2011


And the template is updated with a [7u$N] prefix. 

Cheers,
Edvard

On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:13 PM, Edvard Wendelin wrote:

> I'll update the process page on the openjdk project page when I get to the office tomorrow! I haven't seen any complaints, so I think we can go ahead and do the change. Dalibor, if you don't agree, let me know :)
> 
> Cheers,
> Edvard
> 
> 
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:01 PM, Jeff Dinkins wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 08:50 Wed 02 Nov     , Dan Smith wrote:
>>>> I'd appreciate something like this:
>>>> 
>>>> Subject: [7u2 CR] 7099XXX - Duke's nose is the wrong Pantone shade of red
>> 
>> 
>> Edvard, Dalibor: what needs to be done to make this official and put into practice?
>> 
>> thanks,
>> 
>> jeff
>> 
>> 
>> On Nov 7, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> 
>>> On 08:50 Wed 02 Nov     , Dan Smith wrote:
>>>> I'd appreciate something like this:
>>>> 
>>>> Subject: [7u2 CR] 7099XXX - Duke's nose is the wrong Pantone shade of red
>>>> 
>>>> Right now I've got four different mail rules to try to filter out various review request subject lines; it's very ad hoc.  It's nice to separate these messages out, because they're typically much less likely to be of general interest.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I like this format better too.
>>> 
>>>> (Maybe there are also plans to move these off of the mailing lists entirely as we migrate to JIRA?)
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Depends how this works out.  I wouldn't want to lose any transparency or archiving that the mailing lists provide.
>>> 
>>> A much bigger problem to me at the moment is the amount of commit traffic I get.  Can we not have these
>>> on a separate list?  I need to be signed up to the lists to get the actual patch reviews/discussion, but
>>> a commit to tl gives me about five identical e-mails.
>>> 
>>> I understand those on a particular team want to know what's gone in their repository, but surely this
>>> could be solved by having corresponding commit lists rather than dumping it all on the discussion list?
>>> 
>>>> —Dan
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Andrew :)
>>> 
>>> Free Java Software Engineer
>>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>>> 
>>> Support Free Java!
>>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and IcedTea
>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
>>> http://icedtea.classpath.org
>>> PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
>>> Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F  8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
>> 
> 




More information about the jdk7u-dev mailing list