URGENT: Request for approval for CR #7049963 -, DISTINGUISHED NAMES FOR CERT ARE ESCAPED IN JROCKIT 1.6(NOT COMPATIBLE, WITH JROC

Dalibor Topic dalibor.topic at oracle.com
Thu Sep 15 04:36:23 PDT 2011


On 9/15/11 1:29 PM, Mala Bankal wrote:
> HI Dalibor,
> 
> For jdk8 i have not added the Copyright , but for jdk7u2 i did. This happened during final push.
> This is the reason why :
> 
>  
> Initially  i had updated the copyright (to1996, 2011) for both jdk 8 and 7u2.
> But then during merge found that there was some other fix which had updated the jdk8 file which holds my changes.
> Obviously he/she updated the Copyright to the latest (to 1996, 2011).
> I had to do a fresh clone since the hg merge did not work, it got complicated due to changes to the same file.
>  
> So i did a clone of jdk8 and re-applied the fix excluding the copyright.
> If you compare jdk8 copyright changes (which have been putback) and 7u2 (which i have made) they are identical.
> So i need not change the copyright for 7u2.
>  
> Not sure if Sean can review them before the deadline.

No need to, your explanation is perfectly fine. You can use me (robilad) as the reviewer - approved!

cheers,
dalibor topic

> rgds
> mala
> 
> 
> 
> On 9/15/2011 2:30 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> On 9/15/11 10:49 AM, Mala Bankal wrote:
>>> HI Dalibor,
>>>
>>> a) I can't see the bug on bugs.sun.com - please describe what this
>>> change is supposed to fix.
>>>
>>> 6.0 and 5.0 introduce extract escape character.
>>> for e.g if CN = "Qpass Inc"
>>> older jdk 5.0 and 6.0 keytool prints CN = "Qpass Inc"
>>> later ones print CN =  "\"Qpass Inc\""
>>> Behaviour introduced due to Bug # 6927152.
>>> Fix is to check if string is already quoted, don't re-quote
>> Great, thanks.
>>
>>> b) Is the changeset athttp://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/52bc200b14e5  the same patch as
>>> inhttp://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbankal/7049963/webrev.00/?
>>>
>>> Yes
>> Unfortunately, not quite - there is a change in the copyright block in your webrev,
>> that's not present in the changeset that was pushed into jdk8. So I have to ask Sean
>> to take another look at it per our code review process. See the Project home page for
>> details.
>>
>> cheers,
>> dalibor topic



-- 
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador
Phone: +494023646738 <tel:+494023646738> | Mobile: +491772664192 <tel:+491772664192>
Oracle Java Platform Group

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamburg

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603

Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Kunz, Marcel van de Molen, Alexander van der Ven

Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment



More information about the jdk7u-dev mailing list