Request for approval for 7154030 - java.awt.Component.hide() does not repaint parent component
Seán Coffey
sean.coffey at oracle.com
Thu Aug 2 13:09:01 PDT 2012
Jonathan,
A bug fix can introduce behavioural changes which should not be allowed
in update releases.
In fact, I've just noticed that this fix caused issue in JCK
verification for JDK 8.
See http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7168144 which is
linked to 7154030
I think you may either have to get a swing engineer to review for this
port to 7u or start a specific thread for it on swing-dev.
If swing reviewers do approve this for backporting, then 7168144
changeset will also need porting (simple tag fix for JCK test issue)
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2012-May/002793.html
Regards,
Sean.
On 02/08/2012 08:41, Jonathan Lu wrote:
> Hello Sean,
>
> From my point of view, this backport only introduces a fix for a
> existing bug 7154030.
>
> regards,
> Jonathan
>
> On 08/01/2012 12:05 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>> does this backport introduce any behavioural changes that could cause
>> issue for an update release (as opposed to a feature release/JDK8) ?
>> I'm cc'ing the original reviewer here to confirm this is ok for an
>> update release just to be sure. Pavel, any issues with this going
>> into 7u ? Granted, this is all around a deprecated API so hopefully
>> many applications aren't using it anymore.
>>
>> regards,
>> Sean.
>>
>> On 30/07/2012 23:31, Jonathan Lu wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm requesting an approval to backport the fix for bug 7154030
>>> Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7154030
>>>
>>> Change set from jdk8,
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/340cda7e1430
>>>
>>> the same patch is applicable for jdk7u8.
>>>
>>> The fix has been review here,
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2012-March/002362.html
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>
>
More information about the jdk7u-dev
mailing list