Request for approval: 7142596 RMI JPRT tests are failing

[Stuart Marks]

OK. As one of reviewers for all of these changes, and as the one who'll do the 
actual push, I guess this is a reasonable way to go.

Darryl, do the individual changesets all apply cleanly? If so I can just export 
them from jdk8 myself and apply them to jdk7u and then push them. Or, let me 
know if you'd like me to proceed differently. Also, please create subCRs for 
each of the four affected bugs.

Thanks.

s'marks

On 8/7/12 6:23 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
> Approved for jdk7u-dev.
>
> Like Alan mentioned, probably best to "hg export"/"hg import" the changesets
> and keep jdk7u/8 changes in this area similar. That involves creating a 7u8 bug
> record 7184943, 7184946 & 7186111 also.
>
> regards,
> Sean.
> On 07/08/2012 10:06, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> On 06/08/2012 20:14, Darryl Mocek wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> please review this backport the fix of bug 7142596 for JDK7.
>>>
>>> Bug:http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7142596
>>> <http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7084560>
>>>
>>> This change includes 3 changesets from JDK8:
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/b6f78869c66d
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/89129c0737f1
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/018e555a7a07
>>>
>>> Here are the threads where they were reviewed:
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-July/010772.html
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-July/010910.html
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-July/010940.html
>> I can't tell if you are planning to push one change-set or three but I think
>> it would be better to transplant all 3 three rather than collapsing it into
>> one change-set + bugID (just makes it easier to compare 7u vs. 8 and makes
>> the bug archeology easier).
>>
>> -Alan.
>